Learn

Learning preferences

Make learning more comfortable. Changes apply immediately.

Enlarges page content, including diagrams and their labels. You can also use your browser’s zoom.

Choose the colours that are easiest for you to distinguish. Applies to lesson diagrams and lab plots. Labels, shapes, hatching and line patterns also distinguish meanings. Source photographs and raw image brightness stay unchanged; mask-only views are available for image overlays.

ExampleComparisonSample link

Saved in this browser on this device. Preferences are separate from progress backups.

SCIENCE · INVESTIGATE AND EXPLAIN

Infer a source location without assuming an instrument zero

An inverse problem asks which source parameters could have produced a set of observations. Here the stipulated family is a single positive point charge at position s left of x=1 m, with indicated potential R(x)=K/(x−s)+o and K=kQ. Three readings at x=1,2,3 m contain information about source position, strength and a common offset. Assuming o=0 without evidence can produce a misleading source estimate.

Learning outcome: Change only the voltage offset and show that both neighboring differences remain unchanged. Then change source position and recover all parameters. Freeze a field prediction before revealing it, and explain why another voltage used in fitting is weaker evidence than a truly independent measurement.

Starting recap

Use signed charge, common coordinate axes, SI units, vector components and algebraic ratios. Separate a source field from probe force and a fitted parameter from independently tested evidence.

All lessons are open directly. Your saved experiments remain when you leave and return.

Try

For Q=3 nC, s=−.5 m and offset +2 V, the differences ratio is (3.5)/(1.5)=7/3. The inverse formula recovers s=−.5 m and K=k×3 nC. The predicted independent field at x=2 is k×3 nC/(2.5 m)²≈4.31402486 N/C.

Open the experiment

Predict

An exact three-voltage fit establishes:

Experiment

Change only the voltage offset and show that both neighboring differences remain unchanged. Then change source position and recover all parameters. Freeze a field prediction before revealing it, and explain why another voltage used in fitting is weaker evidence than a truly independent measurement.

Recover source position without assuming a voltage zero

Worked teaching model · synthetic values · Single positive point charge 3 nC on x axis left of probes x=1,2,3 m. Synthetic voltages kQ/(x−s)+offset. Exact coordinates/common gain one; independent field at x=2 is withheld as a model test. Other source arrangements are not excluded by three readings alone.

Reset keeps your prediction, captures and practice history.

Source potential with a fitted instrument offset

indicated potential (V)probe x (m)0419.97510

Unlike graph quantities rescale independently; read units and values, not screen angles. 1: single-source hypothesis (solid). Joined curves show the supplied model, not additional observations.

Equivalent numerical coordinates for Source potential with a fitted instrument offset

single-source hypothesis

probe x (m)indicated potential (V)
119.9751
1.07519.1191
1.1518.341
1.22517.6305
1.316.9793
1.37516.3801
1.4515.827
1.52515.3149
1.614.8394
1.67514.3966
1.7513.9834
1.82513.5968
1.913.2344
1.97512.894
2.0512.5736
2.12512.2715
2.211.9862
2.27511.7163
2.3511.4606
2.42511.218
2.510.9876
2.57510.7683
2.6510.5596
2.72510.3605
2.810.1705
2.8759.98893
2.959.81526
3.0259.64898
3.19.48963
3.1759.33678
3.259.19004
3.3259.04906
3.48.9135
3.4758.78306
3.558.65745
3.6258.5364
3.78.41968
3.7758.30705
3.858.19831
3.9258.09326
47.9917

At most 82 representative computed coordinates including endpoints; the plotted curve can use a finer grid. A table of a revealed generator is not independent measurement evidence.

Calculated quantities under the declared measurement model
QuantityValueUnit
Voltage at x=119.9751V
Voltage at x=212.7851V
Voltage at x=39.70362V
Difference ratio2.33333ratio
Recovered source position-0.5m
Recovered source charge3e-9C
Recovered voltage offset2V
Independent predicted field at x=24.31402N/C

Three nondegenerate readings identify three parameters only within the declared source family.

Subtract readings to remove the common offset. D12/D23=(3−s)/(1−s), so s=(3−R)/(1−R). Then kQ=D12(1−s)(2−s), and recover the offset from one voltage. With noisy readings or R near one, this inverse calculation becomes poorly conditioned. The withheld field checks a different observable; an exact voltage fit alone does not prove that no alternative source arrangement exists.

Predict before inspecting the values. Save contrasting records with assumptions and one alternative explanation. This virtual display does not certify practical measurement technique.

Three nondegenerate readings identify three parameters only within the declared source family.

Subtract readings to remove the common offset. D12/D23=(3−s)/(1−s), so s=(3−R)/(1−R). Then kQ=D12(1−s)(2−s), and recover the offset from one voltage. With noisy readings or R near one, this inverse calculation becomes poorly conditioned. The withheld field checks a different observable; an exact voltage fit alone does not prove that no alternative source arrangement exists.

Captures preserve recipes and replay their calculated results. They are synthetic model evidence, not physical measurements.

Understand

Define the source and measurement boundary

An inverse problem asks which source parameters could have produced a set of observations. Here the stipulated family is a single positive point charge at position s left of x=1 m, with indicated potential R(x)=K/(x−s)+o and K=kQ. Three readings at x=1,2,3 m contain information about source position, strength and a common offset. Assuming o=0 without evidence can produce a misleading source estimate.

Derive the quantitative comparison

Subtract neighboring readings: D12=K/[(1−s)(2−s)] and D23=K/[(2−s)(3−s)]. Their ratio R=D12/D23=(3−s)/(1−s) eliminates both strength and offset. Solving gives s=(3−R)/(1−R), after which K=D12(1−s)(2−s) and o=R(1)−K/(1−s). These numerical coordinate formulas use metres throughout; a change of coordinate units must be carried consistently rather than substituted into bare constants.

Test an alternative before claiming identification

Three exact readings can fit the three parameters of this family, but do not prove that the source really is a single point charge. A different arrangement can agree at a finite set of sample locations. Predicting the field at x=2, E=K/(2−s)², supplies a different observable for an independent check. Measurement noise matters: when the difference ratio is close to one, the denominator in the position formula is small and inference is poorly conditioned. A precise displayed fit is not automatically accurate or uniquely identified.

Worked original case

For Q=3 nC, s=−.5 m and offset +2 V, the differences ratio is (3.5)/(1.5)=7/3. The inverse formula recovers s=−.5 m and K=k×3 nC. The predicted independent field at x=2 is k×3 nC/(2.5 m)²≈4.31402486 N/C.

Investigation

Change only the voltage offset and show that both neighboring differences remain unchanged. Then change source position and recover all parameters. Freeze a field prediction before revealing it, and explain why another voltage used in fitting is weaker evidence than a truly independent measurement.

Changed-case practice

Try the changed case before feedback

At probes x=1,2,3 m, the ratio D12/D23 is 2. Find the inferred source coordinate s in metres within this model.

This practice is public and unsaved. A matching number does not verify understanding. Retain your explanation, assumptions and changed-case evidence in the separate course workspace.

Sources and evidence boundary

Original teaching, numerical cases and diagrams checked 30 October 2026 against the relevant primary textbook explanation. No textbook exercise, image or passage is reproduced. These are bounded synthetic records, not observed apparatus. No charging, wiring, capacitor handling, medical application or safety certification is requested. Preserve first predictions, contrasting settings and critiques in the course evidence workspace; public feedback is not independent mastery or performed laboratory time.

Apply

An exact three-voltage fit establishes:

Public practice checks a specific claim. It does not establish independent mastery.

Which independent observation could reject this model rather than merely refit its parameters?

Continue

Completion requires a saved prediction, at least one capture and a reflection. Presence checks do not grade your reasoning.

Skipping retains experiments and awards no mastery.

Save a science backup or import one

Science work is stored locally in this browser, separately from mathematics and AI. It does not sync automatically. Use this science-only backup; this checkout's older all-subject export does not include science.

A legacy file is available only when the complete snapshot fits the 36 MB limit. For larger snapshots, prepare a complete file set below; never discard notebooks to make a smaller file.

Matching imported notebook drafts replace their current drafts. Omitted lessons and known first attempts remain. Export your current work first if you want to retain both drafts.

Complete file sets and course backups

A file set can hold more work than one science file. Keep its manifest and every part together. Each file is limited to 36 MB. This format needs this version of LearnAI or a compatible newer version; older versions can use only the legacy single-file backup above.

The set includes every saved science course and global continuation at this moment. Later edits need a new export. A conflicting tab exports its own visible work, which may differ from saved work in another tab.

0 file(s) selected. File order and filenames do not determine identity. Missing, changed or conflicting parts block the entire restore; no good part is applied by itself.

Science storage: loading. No account or remote computation is required.