Learn

Learning preferences

Make learning more comfortable. Changes apply immediately.

Enlarges page content, including diagrams and their labels. You can also use your browser’s zoom.

Choose the colours that are easiest for you to distinguish. Applies to lesson diagrams and lab plots. Labels, shapes, hatching and line patterns also distinguish meanings. Source photographs and raw image brightness stay unchanged; mask-only views are available for image overlays.

ExampleComparisonSample link

Saved in this browser on this device. Preferences are separate from progress backups.

SCIENCE · INVESTIGATE AND EXPLAIN

Audit a supplied bandgap detector without claiming a real device

In a semiconductor, electronic states form bands rather than only isolated-atom lines. A valence-to-conduction transition leaves both an electron and an unoccupied valence state called a hole. A band gap is an energy separation, not a physical empty layer between two pieces of material. Doping changes available levels and carrier populations; it does not mean every photon is collected or that a material has one universal efficiency independent of wavelength and temperature.

Learning outcome: Compare equal, below and above-gap photons, then hold photon energy fixed while changing gap. Retain photon rate, current and selected energy shares separately. Explain why no full electrical output efficiency follows.

Starting recap

Separate per-event energy, expectation rate and measurement indication. Check particle identities, conservation, threshold branches and calibration roles before making a source or detector claim.

All lessons are open directly. Your saved experiments remain when you leave and return.

Try

At gap 1.5 eV and photons2 eV, collected current is0.6×1/2=0.3 nA. The selected branch receives0.6 nW; pair-creation energy rate is0.45 nW and excess thermalization0.15 nW. Their sum is0.6 nW, not the total incident1 nW.

Open the experiment

Predict

In this supplied model, one collected electron-hole pair contributes to external current with charge magnitude:

Experiment

Compare equal, below and above-gap photons, then hold photon energy fixed while changing gap. Retain photon rate, current and selected energy shares separately. Explain why no full electrical output efficiency follows.

Audit a supplied photon-to-carrier energy budget

Worked teaching model · synthetic values · Supplied ideal threshold detector at incident power 1 nW, external collected-pair yield 0.6 only strictly above the gap. Exact equality is an energetic threshold with no finite-yield prediction. Pair creation energy and excess thermalization are tracked for the collected branch only; no complete device efficiency or actual material performance claim.

Reset keeps your prediction, captures and practice history.

An energy gap is not a complete spectral response

collected current under stipulated yield (nA)photon energy (eV)030.3934430

Unlike graph quantities rescale independently; read units and values, not screen angles. 1: sampled supplied response; no interpolation across the ideal threshold (open markers). Joined curves show the supplied model, not additional observations.

Equivalent numerical coordinates for An energy gap is not a complete spectral response

sampled supplied response; no interpolation across the ideal threshold

photon energy (eV)collected current under stipulated yield (nA)
10
1.0250
1.050
1.0750
1.10
1.1250
1.150
1.1750
1.20
1.2250
1.250
1.2750
1.30
1.3250
1.350
1.3750
1.40
1.4250
1.450
1.4750
1.50
1.5250.393443
1.550.387097
1.5750.380952
1.60.375
1.6250.369231
1.650.363636
1.6750.358209
1.70.352941
1.7250.347826
1.750.342857
1.7750.338028
1.80.333333
1.8250.328767
1.850.324324
1.8750.32
1.90.315789
1.9250.311688
1.950.307692
1.9750.303797
20.3
2.0250.296296
2.050.292683
2.0750.289157
2.10.285714
2.1250.282353
2.150.27907
2.1750.275862
2.20.272727
2.2250.269663
2.250.266667
2.2750.263736
2.30.26087
2.3250.258065
2.350.255319
2.3750.252632
2.40.25
2.4250.247423
2.450.244898
2.4750.242424
2.50.24
2.5250.237624
2.550.235294
2.5750.23301
2.60.230769
2.6250.228571
2.650.226415
2.6750.224299
2.70.222222
2.7250.220183
2.750.218182
2.7750.216216
2.80.214286
2.8250.212389
2.850.210526
2.8750.208696
2.90.206897
2.9250.205128
2.950.20339
2.9750.201681
30.2

At most 82 representative computed coordinates including endpoints; the plotted curve can use a finer grid. A table of a revealed generator is not independent measurement evidence.

Calculated quantities under the declared measurement model
QuantityValueUnit
Energetic threshold wavelength826.667nm
Incident photon rate3120750000s⁻¹
Strictly above ideal gap1flag
Exact threshold, no finite-yield prediction0flag
Collected pair rate under supplied yield1872450000s⁻¹
Collected current magnitude0.3nA
Pair-creation energy rate for collected branch0.45nW
Excess-energy thermalization rate for collected branch0.15nW
Selected-branch absorbed power0.6nW
Selected energy ledger residual0nW

Enough photon energy is necessary for a band transition; actual absorption and collection need further material evidence.

A valence-to-conduction transition leaves an electron and a hole, not two independent charge quanta delivered through the same external circuit. With the stipulated external yield, current is e times the collected pair rate. For that selected branch, gap energy plus excess thermalization equals absorbed photon energy; uncollected photons and later recombination are outside this partial ledger. Doping changes carrier populations and available levels; the abrupt ideal threshold does not model an actual material, indirect-gap phonons, temperature, dark current or device conversion efficiency.

Predict before inspecting the values. Save contrasting records with assumptions and one alternative explanation. This virtual display does not certify practical measurement technique.

Enough photon energy is necessary for a band transition; actual absorption and collection need further material evidence.

A valence-to-conduction transition leaves an electron and a hole, not two independent charge quanta delivered through the same external circuit. With the stipulated external yield, current is e times the collected pair rate. For that selected branch, gap energy plus excess thermalization equals absorbed photon energy; uncollected photons and later recombination are outside this partial ledger. Doping changes carrier populations and available levels; the abrupt ideal threshold does not model an actual material, indirect-gap phonons, temperature, dark current or device conversion efficiency.

Captures preserve recipes and replay their calculated results. They are synthetic model evidence, not physical measurements.

Understand

State the event and measurement model

In a semiconductor, electronic states form bands rather than only isolated-atom lines. A valence-to-conduction transition leaves both an electron and an unoccupied valence state called a hole. A band gap is an energy separation, not a physical empty layer between two pieces of material. Doping changes available levels and carrier populations; it does not mean every photon is collected or that a material has one universal efficiency independent of wavelength and temperature.

Reconcile the quantitative evidence

The supplied ideal direct-gap detector accepts a finite yield only for photon energy strictly above Eg. Exact equality is an energetic threshold, not a promised finite absorption rate. At fixed incident power 1 nW, photon supply is P/Ephoton in consistent units. A stipulated external collected-pair yield0.6 gives current e times that pair rate, not2e times it: the electron and hole are complementary carriers in a single circuit-transfer process, not permission to double-count collected charge.

Preserve limits and alternative explanations

For the selected collected branch, each event initially assigns Eg to pair creation and Ephoton−Eg to excess-energy thermalization. Their rates add to the selected absorbed photon power. Uncollected photons, later recombination and any external electrical output require further terms, so this partial ledger is not a conversion-efficiency calculation. Actual absorption edges, indirect-gap phonons, temperature, dark current, contact loss and spectral response are deliberately not inferred from this sharp threshold model. The calculation is virtual and gives no construction, bias-voltage or exposure advice.

Worked original case

At gap 1.5 eV and photons2 eV, collected current is0.6×1/2=0.3 nA. The selected branch receives0.6 nW; pair-creation energy rate is0.45 nW and excess thermalization0.15 nW. Their sum is0.6 nW, not the total incident1 nW.

Investigation

Compare equal, below and above-gap photons, then hold photon energy fixed while changing gap. Retain photon rate, current and selected energy shares separately. Explain why no full electrical output efficiency follows.

Changed-case practice

Try the changed case before feedback

At photon energy 3 eV, power 1 nW and stipulated external yield0.6 above the gap, find current magnitude in nA.

This practice is public and unsaved. A matching number does not verify understanding. Retain your explanation, assumptions and changed-case evidence in the separate course workspace.

Sources and boundaries

Original cases checked 31 October 2026 against the primary explanation. These are bounded virtual models, not instructions to illuminate, accelerate, collect or expose real material. No real laboratory participation, detector certification, personal medical conclusion or independent mastery is claimed. Keep first work, critique, revision and genuinely new assigned evidence separately from public practice.

Supplemental source checks, 31 October 2026: Semiconductor devices. Numerical cases remain original supplied models.

Apply

In this supplied model, one collected electron-hole pair contributes to external current with charge magnitude:

Public practice checks a specific claim. It does not establish independent mastery.

Which independent observation would reject the selected model or calibration premise, and which quantity is not identified by these records?

Continue

Completion requires a saved prediction, at least one capture and a reflection. Presence checks do not grade your reasoning.

Skipping retains experiments and awards no mastery.

Save a science backup or import one

Science work is stored locally in this browser, separately from mathematics and AI. It does not sync automatically. Use this science-only backup; this checkout's older all-subject export does not include science.

A legacy file is available only when the complete snapshot fits the 36 MB limit. For larger snapshots, prepare a complete file set below; never discard notebooks to make a smaller file.

Matching imported notebook drafts replace their current drafts. Omitted lessons and known first attempts remain. Export your current work first if you want to retain both drafts.

Complete file sets and course backups

A file set can hold more work than one science file. Keep its manifest and every part together. Each file is limited to 36 MB. This format needs this version of LearnAI or a compatible newer version; older versions can use only the legacy single-file backup above.

The set includes every saved science course and global continuation at this moment. Later edits need a new export. A conflicting tab exports its own visible work, which may differ from saved work in another tab.

0 file(s) selected. File order and filenames do not determine identity. Missing, changed or conflicting parts block the entire restore; no good part is applied by itself.

Science storage: loading. No account or remote computation is required.