Learn

Learning preferences

Make learning more comfortable. Changes apply immediately.

Enlarges page content, including diagrams and their labels. You can also use your browser’s zoom.

Choose the colours that are easiest for you to distinguish. Applies to lesson diagrams and lab plots. Labels, shapes, hatching and line patterns also distinguish meanings. Source photographs and raw image brightness stay unchanged; mask-only views are available for image overlays.

ExampleComparisonSample link

Saved in this browser on this device. Preferences are separate from progress backups.

SCIENCE · INVESTIGATE AND EXPLAIN

Account for charge across an object and its reservoir

Charge accounting begins by choosing recipients and drawing the system boundary. In this packet A, B and a reservoir start neutral. Moving n electrons from A to B leaves A with +ne and gives B −ne. If the reservoir then supplies another m electrons to B, the three final charges are +ne, −(n+m)e and +me. Their total is zero even though the A+B subsystem now has negative charge. Charge has crossed that smaller boundary; it has not been created.

Learning outcome: Hold the first transfer at four electrons and compare reservoir transfers zero, two and six. Retain both subsystem and full-system totals. Draw a separate neutral-polarization picture with no net transferred charge, and explain why an attraction observation would not uniquely identify net sign.

Starting recap

Use signed charge, common coordinate axes, SI units, vector components and algebraic ratios. Separate a source field from probe force and a fitted parameter from independently tested evidence.

All lessons are open directly. Your saved experiments remain when you leave and return.

Try

Move four electrons A→B and two reservoir→B. The final ledger in units e is A +4, B −6, reservoir +2. The A+B charge is −2e=−3.204353268×10⁻¹⁹ C; the complete ledger remains zero.

Open the experiment

Predict

After electrons enter B from an external reservoir, which conservation statement is valid?

Experiment

Hold the first transfer at four electrons and compare reservoir transfers zero, two and six. Retain both subsystem and full-system totals. Draw a separate neutral-polarization picture with no net transferred charge, and explain why an attraction observation would not uniquely identify net sign.

Close an electron and reservoir charge ledger

Worked teaching model · synthetic values · Three initially neutral recipients A, B and reservoir R. Only specified electron transfers occur; positive ionic nuclei remain fixed. Elementary charge e=1.602176634e−19 C. No actual charging or grounding activity.

Reset keeps your prediction, captures and practice history.

Include the recipient that exchanges charge

net charge / erecipient index (1 A, 2 B, 3 reservoir)034-6

Unlike graph quantities rescale independently; read units and values, not screen angles. 1: signed recipient ledger (open markers). Joined curves show the supplied model, not additional observations.

Equivalent numerical coordinates for Include the recipient that exchanges charge

signed recipient ledger

recipient index (1 A, 2 B, 3 reservoir)net charge / e
14
2-6
32

At most 82 representative computed coordinates including endpoints; the plotted curve can use a finer grid. A table of a revealed generator is not independent measurement evidence.

Calculated quantities under the declared measurement model
QuantityValueUnit
A net charge6.40871e-19C
B net charge-9.61306e-19C
Reservoir net charge3.20435e-19C
A plus B net charge-3.20435e-19C
Whole closed system net charge0C
Transferred electrons counted6count

A subsystem can gain charge while the full recipient ledger conserves it.

Removing electrons leaves positive net charge; adding electrons gives negative charge. Electron count is integer here, not a continuous fraction. Neutral polarization separates bound or mobile charge within an object without changing its total. Grounding in a different model exchanges charge with a reservoir; it does not destroy charge or always mean zero object charge.

Predict before inspecting the values. Save contrasting records with assumptions and one alternative explanation. This virtual display does not certify practical measurement technique.

A subsystem can gain charge while the full recipient ledger conserves it.

Removing electrons leaves positive net charge; adding electrons gives negative charge. Electron count is integer here, not a continuous fraction. Neutral polarization separates bound or mobile charge within an object without changing its total. Grounding in a different model exchanges charge with a reservoir; it does not destroy charge or always mean zero object charge.

Captures preserve recipes and replay their calculated results. They are synthetic model evidence, not physical measurements.

Understand

Define the source and measurement boundary

Charge accounting begins by choosing recipients and drawing the system boundary. In this packet A, B and a reservoir start neutral. Moving n electrons from A to B leaves A with +ne and gives B −ne. If the reservoir then supplies another m electrons to B, the three final charges are +ne, −(n+m)e and +me. Their total is zero even though the A+B subsystem now has negative charge. Charge has crossed that smaller boundary; it has not been created.

Derive the quantitative comparison

The elementary charge magnitude is e=1.602176634×10⁻¹⁹ C. A positive net charge generally means an electron deficit in these fixed-nucleus objects, not that protons traveled along the transfer path. The small numbers in this fictional packet deliberately make quantization visible. A macroscopic coulomb contains an enormous number of elementary charges, so ordinary instrument displays can look continuous without changing the underlying accounting.

Test an alternative before claiming identification

Polarization is different from a net transfer. A neutral insulator can have small bound-charge displacements; a neutral conductor can redistribute mobile electrons. Both can have unequal local charge densities while retaining zero total charge. A polarized neutral object can be attracted in a nonuniform field, so attraction alone does not establish its net charge sign. A grounding connection in a different model exchanges charge with a large reservoir and constrains potential; it does not destroy charge or guarantee that an object near external sources has zero net charge. No physical charging or grounding procedure is requested.

Worked original case

Move four electrons A→B and two reservoir→B. The final ledger in units e is A +4, B −6, reservoir +2. The A+B charge is −2e=−3.204353268×10⁻¹⁹ C; the complete ledger remains zero.

Investigation

Hold the first transfer at four electrons and compare reservoir transfers zero, two and six. Retain both subsystem and full-system totals. Draw a separate neutral-polarization picture with no net transferred charge, and explain why an attraction observation would not uniquely identify net sign.

Changed-case practice

Try the changed case before feedback

Five electrons move A→B and three more reservoir→B. Report B net charge in units of e, including its sign.

This practice is public and unsaved. A matching number does not verify understanding. Retain your explanation, assumptions and changed-case evidence in the separate course workspace.

Sources and evidence boundary

Original teaching, numerical cases and diagrams checked 30 October 2026 against the relevant primary textbook explanation. No textbook exercise, image or passage is reproduced. These are bounded synthetic records, not observed apparatus. No charging, wiring, capacitor handling, medical application or safety certification is requested. Preserve first predictions, contrasting settings and critiques in the course evidence workspace; public feedback is not independent mastery or performed laboratory time.

Apply

After electrons enter B from an external reservoir, which conservation statement is valid?

Public practice checks a specific claim. It does not establish independent mastery.

Which independent observation could reject this model rather than merely refit its parameters?

Continue

Completion requires a saved prediction, at least one capture and a reflection. Presence checks do not grade your reasoning.

Skipping retains experiments and awards no mastery.

Save a science backup or import one

Science work is stored locally in this browser, separately from mathematics and AI. It does not sync automatically. Use this science-only backup; this checkout's older all-subject export does not include science.

A legacy file is available only when the complete snapshot fits the 36 MB limit. For larger snapshots, prepare a complete file set below; never discard notebooks to make a smaller file.

Matching imported notebook drafts replace their current drafts. Omitted lessons and known first attempts remain. Export your current work first if you want to retain both drafts.

Complete file sets and course backups

A file set can hold more work than one science file. Keep its manifest and every part together. Each file is limited to 36 MB. This format needs this version of LearnAI or a compatible newer version; older versions can use only the legacy single-file backup above.

The set includes every saved science course and global continuation at this moment. Later edits need a new export. A conflicting tab exports its own visible work, which may differ from saved work in another tab.

0 file(s) selected. File order and filenames do not determine identity. Missing, changed or conflicting parts block the entire restore; no good part is applied by itself.

Science storage: loading. No account or remote computation is required.