Learn

Learning preferences

Make learning more comfortable. Changes apply immediately.

Enlarges page content, including diagrams and their labels. You can also use your browser’s zoom.

Choose the colours that are easiest for you to distinguish. Applies to lesson diagrams and lab plots. Labels, shapes, hatching and line patterns also distinguish meanings. Source photographs and raw image brightness stay unchanged; mask-only views are available for image overlays.

ExampleComparisonSample link

Saved in this browser on this device. Preferences are separate from progress backups.

SCIENCE · INVESTIGATE AND EXPLAIN

Test an inverse-square force after removing a baseline

Coulomb force for two stationary point charges has magnitude k|qQ|/r² and acts along the line joining them. Like signs repel and unlike signs attract. The two reciprocal forces have equal magnitude and act on different recipients; changing one mass would change its acceleration, not break the force-pair relation. This lesson studies force readings rather than asserting that an instrument directly reveals the ideal force.

Learning outcome: Compare offsets −1, 0 and +1 µN at fixed source charge, retaining raw ratios and recovered force. Then change source magnitude. Freeze a third-distance prediction before revealing it; name a non-electrical calibration alternative if it disagrees.

Starting recap

Use signed charge, common coordinate axes, SI units, vector components and algebraic ratios. Separate a source field from probe force and a fitted parameter from independently tested evidence.

All lessons are open directly. Your saved experiments remain when you leave and return.

Try

With source 3 nC, probe 2 nC and r=.1 m, physical force is 5.39253107538 µN. Offset .5 µN gives near 5.89253107538 and far 1.848132768845 µN. Their difference recovers 5.39253107538 µN; the third prediction is 1.09917011949 µN.

Open the experiment

Predict

Why can the two raw force readings fail a four-to-one ratio?

Experiment

Compare offsets −1, 0 and +1 µN at fixed source charge, retaining raw ratios and recovered force. Then change source magnitude. Freeze a third-distance prediction before revealing it; name a non-electrical calibration alternative if it disagrees.

Separate inverse-square force from a sensor baseline

Worked teaching model · synthetic values · Two positive point charges, source selected and probe 2 nC. Synthetic force at exact separations .1 and .2 m, common additive force offset. Vacuum k=8.9875517923e9 N m²/C². Finite sizes and force backreaction are neglected.

Reset keeps your prediction, captures and practice history.

Force indications versus separation

indicated force (µN)separation (m)00.45.892530

Unlike graph quantities rescale independently; read units and values, not screen angles. 1: inverse square plus baseline (solid). Joined curves show the supplied model, not additional observations.

Equivalent numerical coordinates for Force indications versus separation

inverse square plus baseline

separation (m)indicated force (µN)
0.15.89253
0.10755.16633
0.1154.57753
0.12254.09352
0.133.69085
0.13753.35225
0.1453.06482
0.15252.81874
0.162.60646
0.16752.42204
0.1752.26083
0.18252.11907
0.191.99378
0.19751.88248
0.2051.78317
0.21251.69419
0.221.61416
0.22751.54191
0.2351.47647
0.24251.417
0.251.3628
0.25751.31328
0.2651.26789
0.27251.22621
0.281.18782
0.28751.1524
0.2951.11965
0.30251.08931
0.311.06114
0.31751.03494
0.3251.01054
0.33250.987764
0.340.966482
0.34750.946563
0.3550.927894
0.36250.910371
0.370.893903
0.37750.878407
0.3850.863807
0.39250.850037
0.40.837033

At most 82 representative computed coordinates including endpoints; the plotted curve can use a finer grid. A table of a revealed generator is not independent measurement evidence.

Calculated quantities under the declared measurement model
QuantityValueUnit
Near force indication5.89253µN
Far force indication1.84813µN
Recovered near physical force5.39253µN
Recovered force offset0.5µN
Recovered source charge3e-9C
Third-point predicted indication at .3 m1.09917µN

The force difference removes the additive baseline before an inverse-square ratio is tested.

At twice the separation the physical force is one quarter, but the indicated readings need not have ratio four. Fnear=(4/3)(Rnear−Rfar), then offset=Rnear−Fnear. Two readings fit two unknowns under the chosen law; a withheld third separation tests that law, not merely its fitted parameters. Signed indication can be negative with a negative baseline even though the repulsive force magnitude remains positive.

Predict before inspecting the values. Save contrasting records with assumptions and one alternative explanation. This virtual display does not certify practical measurement technique.

The force difference removes the additive baseline before an inverse-square ratio is tested.

At twice the separation the physical force is one quarter, but the indicated readings need not have ratio four. Fnear=(4/3)(Rnear−Rfar), then offset=Rnear−Fnear. Two readings fit two unknowns under the chosen law; a withheld third separation tests that law, not merely its fitted parameters. Signed indication can be negative with a negative baseline even though the repulsive force magnitude remains positive.

Captures preserve recipes and replay their calculated results. They are synthetic model evidence, not physical measurements.

Understand

Define the source and measurement boundary

Coulomb force for two stationary point charges has magnitude k|qQ|/r² and acts along the line joining them. Like signs repel and unlike signs attract. The two reciprocal forces have equal magnitude and act on different recipients; changing one mass would change its acceleration, not break the force-pair relation. This lesson studies force readings rather than asserting that an instrument directly reveals the ideal force.

Derive the quantitative comparison

Write the near indication R₁=F+o and the indication at twice the distance R₂=F/4+o. Subtraction cancels the common additive offset: F=(4/3)(R₁−R₂). Then o=R₁−F. A raw ratio R₁/R₂ need not equal four even when the physical force obeys the inverse-square model. Conversely, two readings fit the two parameters under that model and do not by themselves prove the exponent.

Test an alternative before claiming identification

Predict a third reading at three times the near distance: R₃=F/9+o. Disagreement can challenge the inverse-square point-source assumptions, the constant baseline, the distance scale, or source stability. It does not uniquely identify which assumption failed. Keep charge in coulombs and separation in metres before calculating; converting a micro-newton readout to newtons is a unit conversion, while estimating an offset is an evidence-based calibration step. Finite conducting objects may redistribute charge at close separation, outside the fixed point-charge model.

Worked original case

With source 3 nC, probe 2 nC and r=.1 m, physical force is 5.39253107538 µN. Offset .5 µN gives near 5.89253107538 and far 1.848132768845 µN. Their difference recovers 5.39253107538 µN; the third prediction is 1.09917011949 µN.

Investigation

Compare offsets −1, 0 and +1 µN at fixed source charge, retaining raw ratios and recovered force. Then change source magnitude. Freeze a third-distance prediction before revealing it; name a non-electrical calibration alternative if it disagrees.

Changed-case practice

Try the changed case before feedback

At distances r and 2r, indications are 7 and 2.5 µN with one unknown common offset. Find the near physical force in µN.

This practice is public and unsaved. A matching number does not verify understanding. Retain your explanation, assumptions and changed-case evidence in the separate course workspace.

Sources and evidence boundary

Original teaching, numerical cases and diagrams checked 30 October 2026 against the relevant primary textbook explanation. No textbook exercise, image or passage is reproduced. These are bounded synthetic records, not observed apparatus. No charging, wiring, capacitor handling, medical application or safety certification is requested. Preserve first predictions, contrasting settings and critiques in the course evidence workspace; public feedback is not independent mastery or performed laboratory time.

Apply

Why can the two raw force readings fail a four-to-one ratio?

Public practice checks a specific claim. It does not establish independent mastery.

Which independent observation could reject this model rather than merely refit its parameters?

Continue

Completion requires a saved prediction, at least one capture and a reflection. Presence checks do not grade your reasoning.

Skipping retains experiments and awards no mastery.

Save a science backup or import one

Science work is stored locally in this browser, separately from mathematics and AI. It does not sync automatically. Use this science-only backup; this checkout's older all-subject export does not include science.

A legacy file is available only when the complete snapshot fits the 36 MB limit. For larger snapshots, prepare a complete file set below; never discard notebooks to make a smaller file.

Matching imported notebook drafts replace their current drafts. Omitted lessons and known first attempts remain. Export your current work first if you want to retain both drafts.

Complete file sets and course backups

A file set can hold more work than one science file. Keep its manifest and every part together. Each file is limited to 36 MB. This format needs this version of LearnAI or a compatible newer version; older versions can use only the legacy single-file backup above.

The set includes every saved science course and global continuation at this moment. Later edits need a new export. A conflicting tab exports its own visible work, which may differ from saved work in another tab.

0 file(s) selected. File order and filenames do not determine identity. Missing, changed or conflicting parts block the entire restore; no good part is applied by itself.

Science storage: loading. No account or remote computation is required.