Learn

Learning preferences

Make learning more comfortable. Changes apply immediately.

Enlarges page content, including diagrams and their labels. You can also use your browser’s zoom.

Choose the colours that are easiest for you to distinguish. Applies to lesson diagrams and lab plots. Labels, shapes, hatching and line patterns also distinguish meanings. Source photographs and raw image brightness stay unchanged; mask-only views are available for image overlays.

ExampleComparisonSample link

Saved in this browser on this device. Preferences are separate from progress backups.

SCIENCE · INVESTIGATE AND EXPLAIN

Test a rolling constraint before using its acceleration

A no-slip rolling relation is a constraint that friction must be able to sustain. Consider a rigid circular body released on a stationary incline with I = κmR². Translation down the slope gives mg sinθ − f = ma, while center torque and no-slip acceleration give fR = I a/R.

Learning outcome: Derive translation and torque equations, evaluate the friction inequality, and retain one accepted and one rejected branch.

Starting recap

Integrate mass moments about named axes, derive torque and angular-momentum constraints, and test orbital energy, angular and numerical consistency against independent evidence.

All lessons are open directly. Your saved experiments remain when you leave and return.

Try

At κ = 1 and θ = 20 degrees, required coefficient is tan(20°)/2 ≈ 0.181985, still feasible. The accepted acceleration is 5 sin(20°) ≈ 1.71010 m/s².

Open the experiment

Predict

If required static friction exceeds its available bound, the no-slip result should be:

Experiment

Derive translation and torque equations, evaluate the friction inequality, and retain one accepted and one rejected branch.

Check static friction before imposing rolling

Worked teaching model · synthetic values · Rigid circular body released from rest on a stationary straight incline, g=10 and static coefficient .2. Proposed no-slip rolling has I=kappa mR². Reject that constraint if required friction exceeds its bound; no kinetic slipping continuation is supplied.

Reset keeps your prediction, captures and practice history.

Required static coefficient versus slope

required static coefficientincline angle (degrees)0400.27969990

Unlike graph quantities rescale independently; read units and values, not screen angles. 1: kappa tan(theta)/(1+kappa) (solid). Joined curves show the supplied model, not additional observations.

Equivalent numerical coordinates for Required static coefficient versus slope

kappa tan(theta)/(1+kappa)

incline angle (degrees)required static coefficient
00
0.50.002908956
10.005818355
1.50.008728641
20.01164026
2.50.01455365
30.01746926
3.50.02038754
40.02330894
4.50.0262339
50.02916289
5.50.03209635
60.03503475
6.50.03797854
70.04092819
7.50.04388417
80.04684694
8.50.049817
90.05279481
9.50.05578087
100.05877566
10.50.06177968
110.06479344
11.50.06781743
120.07085219
12.50.07389822
130.07695606
13.50.08002625
140.08310933
14.50.08620586
150.0893164
15.50.09244151
160.0955818
16.50.09873783
170.1019102
17.50.1050996
180.1083066
18.50.1115318
190.1147759
19.50.1180395
200.1213234
20.50.1246282
210.1279547
21.50.1313035
220.1346754
22.50.1380712
230.1414916
23.50.1449375
240.1484096
24.50.1519088
250.1554359
25.50.1589918
260.1625775
26.50.1661939
270.1698418
27.50.1735224
280.1772365
28.50.1809852
290.1847697
29.50.1885909
300.1924501
30.50.1963483
310.2002869
31.50.2042669
320.2082898
32.50.2123568
330.2164692
33.50.2206285
340.2248362
34.50.2290937
350.2334025
35.50.2377644
360.2421808
36.50.2466537
370.2511847
37.50.2557757
380.2604285
38.50.2651453
390.269928
39.50.2747788
400.2796999

At most 82 representative computed coordinates including endpoints; the plotted curve can use a finer grid. A table of a revealed generator is not independent measurement evidence.

Calculated quantities under the declared measurement model
QuantityValueUnit
Required static coefficient0.1213234ratio
Available static coefficient0.2ratio
Proposed rolling constraint feasible1flag
Required upslope friction per mass1.140067N/kg
Normal force per mass9.396926N/kg
Downslope center acceleration2.280134m/s²
Rotational fraction of kinetic energy0.3333333ratio

The supplied static bound can support the proposed no-slip constraint.

Translation gives mg sinθ−f=ma; rotation and no-slip give fR=I a/R. Solve a=g sinθ/(1+kappa), f/m=kappa a, and require f≤mu_s mg cosθ. Static friction at stationary no-slip contact does zero total contact work in the ground frame, while its center-translation and center-torque power terms cancel. Rejection needs a new friction/rotation model.

Predict before inspecting the values. Save contrasting records with assumptions and one alternative explanation. This virtual display does not certify practical measurement technique.

The supplied static bound can support the proposed no-slip constraint.

Translation gives mg sinθ−f=ma; rotation and no-slip give fR=I a/R. Solve a=g sinθ/(1+kappa), f/m=kappa a, and require f≤mu_s mg cosθ. Static friction at stationary no-slip contact does zero total contact work in the ground frame, while its center-translation and center-torque power terms cancel. Rejection needs a new friction/rotation model.

Captures preserve recipes and replay their calculated results. They are synthetic model evidence, not physical measurements.

Understand

Test a rolling constraint before using its acceleration

A no-slip rolling relation is a constraint that friction must be able to sustain. Consider a rigid circular body released on a stationary incline with I = κmR². Translation down the slope gives mg sinθ − f = ma, while center torque and no-slip acceleration give fR = I a/R.

Combining the equations yields a = g sinθ/(1 + κ) and upslope static friction f = κma. The normal force is mg cosθ, so the required coefficient is κtanθ/(1 + κ). Compare this with the supplied static coefficient 0.2 before accepting the no-slip branch.

At κ = 0.5 and θ = 20 degrees, the required coefficient is about 0.121323, below 0.2, and acceleration is about 2.28013 m/s² for g = 10. At 40 degrees the requirement is about 0.279700, so that proposed rolling solution fails the available-friction test. The display withholds accepted rolling acceleration in that branch rather than quietly reporting an inconsistent result.

Static friction can provide center torque without dissipating total mechanical energy at a stationary no-slip contact. Its negative center-translation power and positive rotational power cancel. This statement depends on the contact kinematics; it does not imply that every force called static friction always does zero work. A rejected rolling branch would need a separate kinetic-friction and angular-motion model.

Changed-case check

Predict before reading the comparison. At κ = 1 and θ = 20 degrees, required coefficient is tan(20°)/2 ≈ 0.181985, still feasible. The accepted acceleration is 5 sin(20°) ≈ 1.71010 m/s².

Retained investigation

Derive translation and torque equations, evaluate the friction inequality, and retain one accepted and one rejected branch. How can a torque transfer energy into rotation while contact does no net ground-frame work?

Source and boundary

Primary conceptual reference checked 30 October 2026: OpenStax University Physics Volume 1. All models, packets and teaching prose are original. These are bounded mathematical investigations, not measured apparatus, physical procedures, practical certification or institutional credit.

Apply

If required static friction exceeds its available bound, the no-slip result should be:

Public practice checks a specific claim. It does not establish independent mastery.

How can a torque transfer energy into rotation while contact does no net ground-frame work?

Continue

Completion requires a saved prediction, at least one capture and a reflection. Presence checks do not grade your reasoning.

Skipping retains experiments and awards no mastery.

Save a science backup or import one

Science work is stored locally in this browser, separately from mathematics and AI. It does not sync automatically. Use this science-only backup; this checkout's older all-subject export does not include science.

A legacy file is available only when the complete snapshot fits the 36 MB limit. For larger snapshots, prepare a complete file set below; never discard notebooks to make a smaller file.

Matching imported notebook drafts replace their current drafts. Omitted lessons and known first attempts remain. Export your current work first if you want to retain both drafts.

Complete file sets and course backups

A file set can hold more work than one science file. Keep its manifest and every part together. Each file is limited to 36 MB. This format needs this version of LearnAI or a compatible newer version; older versions can use only the legacy single-file backup above.

The set includes every saved science course and global continuation at this moment. Later edits need a new export. A conflicting tab exports its own visible work, which may differ from saved work in another tab.

0 file(s) selected. File order and filenames do not determine identity. Missing, changed or conflicting parts block the entire restore; no good part is applied by itself.

Science storage: loading. No account or remote computation is required.