Learning preferences

Make learning more comfortable. Changes apply immediately.

Enlarges page content, including diagrams and their labels. You can also use your browser’s zoom.

Choose the colours that are easiest for you to distinguish. Applies to lesson diagrams and lab plots. Labels, shapes, hatching and line patterns also distinguish meanings. Source photographs and raw image brightness stay unchanged; mask-only views are available for image overlays.

ExampleComparisonSample link

Saved in this browser on this device. Preferences are separate from progress backups.

SCIENCE · INVESTIGATE AND EXPLAIN

Propagate orbital observations without hiding a clock gain

For a circular test-particle orbit, gravitational acceleration μ/r² equals v²/r and v = 2πr/T. Combining them gives μ = 4π²r³/T². An inferred parameter therefore depends strongly on both radius and the clock used for period.

Learning outcome: Derive the circular inference, evaluate its monotone endpoint bounds and compare a repeated shared-clock record with genuinely independent calibration.

Starting recap

Integrate mass moments about named axes, derive torque and angular-momentum constraints, and test orbital energy, angular and numerical consistency against independent evidence.

All lessons are open directly. Your saved experiments remain when you leave and return.

Try

With μtrue = 1 and an exact gain of 1, the nominal inference returns 1. With gain 1.1 it returns 1/1.21 ≈ 0.826446 m³/s², even if repeated indicated periods agree perfectly.

Open the experiment

Predict

For μ = 4π²r³/T², which interval corner gives its lower bound?

Experiment

Derive the circular inference, evaluate its monotone endpoint bounds and compare a repeated shared-clock record with genuinely independent calibration.

Propagate radius and clock assumptions through orbital inference

Worked teaching model · synthetic values · Supplied circular radius2 m and true period2pi sqrt(8/mu). Readout gain multiplies period. Inferred mu uses reported radius2±.02 m and indicated period±.1 s as deterministic observation bounds. They do not include an unknown systematic gain unless explicitly corrected.

Reset keeps your prediction, captures and practice history.

Parameter inferred under hypothesized clock correction

inferred gravitational parameter (m³/s²)assumed clock gain01.11.0975060

Unlike graph quantities rescale independently; read units and values, not screen angles. 1: nominal parameter times gain squared (solid). Joined curves show the supplied model, not additional observations.

Equivalent numerical coordinates for Parameter inferred under hypothesized clock correction

nominal parameter times gain squared

assumed clock gaininferred gravitational parameter (m³/s²)
0.90.7346939
0.90250.7387812
0.9050.7428798
0.90750.7469898
0.910.7511111
0.91250.7552438
0.9150.7593878
0.91750.7635431
0.920.7677098
0.92250.7718878
0.9250.7760771
0.92750.7802778
0.930.7844898
0.93250.7887132
0.9350.7929478
0.93750.7971939
0.940.8014512
0.94250.80572
0.9450.81
0.94750.8142914
0.950.8185941
0.95250.8229082
0.9550.8272336
0.95750.8315703
0.960.8359184
0.96250.8402778
0.9650.8446485
0.96750.8490306
0.970.853424
0.97250.8578288
0.9750.8622449
0.97750.8666723
0.980.8711111
0.98250.8755612
0.9850.8800227
0.98750.8844955
0.990.8889796
0.99250.8934751
0.9950.8979819
0.99750.9025
10.9070295
1.00250.9115703
1.0050.9161224
1.00750.9206859
1.010.9252608
1.01250.9298469
1.0150.9344444
1.01750.9390533
1.020.9436735
1.02250.948305
1.0250.9529478
1.02750.957602
1.030.9622676
1.03250.9669444
1.0350.9716327
1.03750.9763322
1.040.9810431
1.04250.9857653
1.0450.9904989
1.04750.9952438
1.051
1.05251.004768
1.0551.009546
1.05751.014337
1.061.019138
1.06251.023951
1.0651.028776
1.06751.033611
1.071.038458
1.07251.043316
1.0751.048186
1.07751.053067
1.081.057959
1.08251.062863
1.0851.067778
1.08751.072704
1.091.077642
1.09251.082591
1.0951.087551
1.09751.092523
1.11.097506

At most 82 representative computed coordinates including endpoints; the plotted curve can use a finer grid. A table of a revealed generator is not independent measurement evidence.

Calculated quantities under the declared measurement model
QuantityValueUnit
True circular period17.77153s
Indicated period18.66011s
Uncorrected inferred gravitational parameter0.9070295m³/s²
Observation-bound inferred lower parameter0.8707322m³/s²
Observation-bound inferred upper parameter0.9446106m³/s²
Actual parameter included by stated observation bounds0flag

Narrow random-free observation bounds do not cover an omitted systematic clock scale by declaration.

Circular balance gives mu=4pi²r³/T². It increases with radius and decreases with period, so interval endpoints pair low radius with high period and vice versa. The disclosed clock gain causes nominal inference mu/gain². Correcting that gain requires independent timing evidence; refitting the same period cannot supply it.

Predict before inspecting the values. Save contrasting records with assumptions and one alternative explanation. This virtual display does not certify practical measurement technique.

Narrow random-free observation bounds do not cover an omitted systematic clock scale by declaration.

Circular balance gives mu=4pi²r³/T². It increases with radius and decreases with period, so interval endpoints pair low radius with high period and vice versa. The disclosed clock gain causes nominal inference mu/gain². Correcting that gain requires independent timing evidence; refitting the same period cannot supply it.

Captures preserve recipes and replay their calculated results. They are synthetic model evidence, not physical measurements.

Understand

Propagate orbital observations without hiding a clock gain

For a circular test-particle orbit, gravitational acceleration μ/r² equals v²/r and v = 2πr/T. Combining them gives μ = 4π²r³/T². An inferred parameter therefore depends strongly on both radius and the clock used for period.

The disclosed true radius is 2 m. If the period readout multiplies true time by gain g, an uncorrected inference gives μtrue/g². At μtrue = 1 and g = 1.05, it reports about 0.907029 m³/s². Repeating the period with the same readout does not independently calibrate that gain.

The observation packet places deterministic bounds of ±0.02 m around reported radius 2 m and ±0.1 s around the indicated period. Since the formula increases with radius and decreases with period, the lower parameter endpoint uses the smaller radius and larger period; the upper endpoint uses the opposite corners.

These bounds only express the stated observation errors. They do not automatically include an omitted systematic gain, and they are not probability intervals. The display separately asks whether the disclosed true parameter lies inside the resulting interval. An external clock reference or an independently calibrated dynamical measurement would be needed to resolve the systematic alternative.

Changed-case check

Predict before reading the comparison. With μtrue = 1 and an exact gain of 1, the nominal inference returns 1. With gain 1.1 it returns 1/1.21 ≈ 0.826446 m³/s², even if repeated indicated periods agree perfectly.

Retained investigation

Derive the circular inference, evaluate its monotone endpoint bounds and compare a repeated shared-clock record with genuinely independent calibration. Why can an interval be narrow and still exclude the actual parameter?

Source and boundary

Primary conceptual reference checked 30 October 2026: OpenStax University Physics Volume 1. All models, packets and teaching prose are original. These are bounded mathematical investigations, not measured apparatus, physical procedures, practical certification or institutional credit.

Apply

For μ = 4π²r³/T², which interval corner gives its lower bound?

Public practice checks a specific claim. It does not establish independent mastery.

Why can an interval be narrow and still exclude the actual parameter?

Continue

Completion requires a saved prediction, at least one capture and a reflection. Presence checks do not grade your reasoning.

Skipping retains experiments and awards no mastery.

Save a science backup or import one

Science work is stored locally in this browser, separately from mathematics and AI. It does not sync automatically. Use this science-only backup; this checkout's older all-subject export does not include science.

A legacy file is available only when the complete snapshot fits the 36 MB limit. For larger snapshots, prepare a complete file set below; never discard notebooks to make a smaller file.

Matching imported notebook drafts replace their current drafts. Omitted lessons and known first attempts remain. Export your current work first if you want to retain both drafts.

Complete file sets and course backups

A file set can hold more work than one science file. Keep its manifest and every part together. Each file is limited to 36 MB. This format needs this version of LearnAI or a compatible newer version; older versions can use only the legacy single-file backup above.

The set includes every saved science course and global continuation at this moment. Later edits need a new export. A conflicting tab exports its own visible work, which may differ from saved work in another tab.

0 file(s) selected. File order and filenames do not determine identity. Missing, changed or conflicting parts block the entire restore; no good part is applied by itself.

Science storage: loading. No account or remote computation is required.