Learn

Learning preferences

Make learning more comfortable. Changes apply immediately.

Enlarges page content, including diagrams and their labels. You can also use your browser’s zoom.

Choose the colours that are easiest for you to distinguish. Applies to lesson diagrams and lab plots. Labels, shapes, hatching and line patterns also distinguish meanings. Source photographs and raw image brightness stay unchanged; mask-only views are available for image overlays.

ExampleComparisonSample link

Saved in this browser on this device. Preferences are separate from progress backups.

SCIENCE · INVESTIGATE AND EXPLAIN

Distinguish required electric sources from a forbidden magnetic gradient

Maxwell equations can be used to audit a proposed field instead of merely generating a familiar wave. In a local Cartesian region take static E=(a x,0,0), where a has units V/m². Compare a transverse magnetic gradient B=(0,gx,0) with a longitudinal one B=(gx,0,0); the numerical coefficient g is a times 10⁻⁶ T/m under the explicitly linked teaching controls.

Learning outcome: Compare transverse and longitudinal gradients at positive, negative and zero coefficient. Compute divergences and curls before assigning sources. Keep electric Gauss, magnetic Gauss, Faraday and Ampère as separate checks rather than claiming that one passing equation validates the whole field.

Starting recap

Review flux integrals, linear differential equations, initial conditions, complex numbers and vector derivatives. Keep source constraints, RMS conventions and calibration roles explicit.

All lessons are open directly. Your saved experiments remain when you leave and return.

Try

At a=1 V/m² with the transverse magnetic option, required charge density is epsilon0 C/m³ and current density is 10⁻⁶/mu0=1/(0.4π)≈0.795775 A/m² along positive z. Switching to the longitudinal magnetic gradient leaves div B=10⁻⁶ T/m, so the ordinary Maxwell model rejects it.

Open the experiment

Predict

Can a suitable electric current repair a nonzero divergence of B in ordinary Maxwell theory?

Experiment

Compare transverse and longitudinal gradients at positive, negative and zero coefficient. Compute divergences and curls before assigning sources. Keep electric Gauss, magnetic Gauss, Faraday and Ampère as separate checks rather than claiming that one passing equation validates the whole field.

Identify required sources and reject nonzero magnetic divergence

Worked teaching model · synthetic values · Static ansatz E=(a x,0,0) V/m. B is either (0,a*1e−6 x,0) T or (a*1e−6 x,0,0) T, with x in metres. Evaluate derivatives, not a global finite apparatus. Ordinary Maxwell theory has no magnetic monopoles; nonzero div B is rejected rather than assigned a fictional magnetic charge.

Reset keeps your prediction, captures and practice history.

Candidate electric field

Ex (V/m)x (m)-111-1

Unlike graph quantities rescale independently; read units and values, not screen angles. 1: static electric gradient (solid). Joined curves show the supplied model, not additional observations.

Equivalent numerical coordinates for Candidate electric field

static electric gradient

x (m)Ex (V/m)
-1-1
-0.975-0.975
-0.95-0.95
-0.925-0.925
-0.9-0.9
-0.875-0.875
-0.85-0.85
-0.825-0.825
-0.8-0.8
-0.775-0.775
-0.75-0.75
-0.725-0.725
-0.7-0.7
-0.675-0.675
-0.65-0.65
-0.625-0.625
-0.6-0.6
-0.575-0.575
-0.55-0.55
-0.525-0.525
-0.5-0.5
-0.475-0.475
-0.45-0.45
-0.425-0.425
-0.4-0.4
-0.375-0.375
-0.35-0.35
-0.325-0.325
-0.3-0.3
-0.275-0.275
-0.25-0.25
-0.225-0.225
-0.2-0.2
-0.175-0.175
-0.15-0.15
-0.125-0.125
-0.1-0.1
-0.075-0.075
-0.05-0.05
-0.025-0.025
00
0.0250.025
0.050.05
0.0750.075
0.10.1
0.1250.125
0.150.15
0.1750.175
0.20.2
0.2250.225
0.250.25
0.2750.275
0.30.3
0.3250.325
0.350.35
0.3750.375
0.40.4
0.4250.425
0.450.45
0.4750.475
0.50.5
0.5250.525
0.550.55
0.5750.575
0.60.6
0.6250.625
0.650.65
0.6750.675
0.70.7
0.7250.725
0.750.75
0.7750.775
0.80.8
0.8250.825
0.850.85
0.8750.875
0.90.9
0.9250.925
0.950.95
0.9750.975
11

At most 82 representative computed coordinates including endpoints; the plotted curve can use a finer grid. A table of a revealed generator is not independent measurement evidence.

Candidate magnetic field with separate physical units

By (microtesla)x (m)-111-1

Unlike graph quantities rescale independently; read units and values, not screen angles. 1: transverse magnetic gradient (solid). Joined curves show the supplied model, not additional observations.

Equivalent numerical coordinates for Candidate magnetic field with separate physical units

transverse magnetic gradient

x (m)By (microtesla)
-1-1
-0.975-0.975
-0.95-0.95
-0.925-0.925
-0.9-0.9
-0.875-0.875
-0.85-0.85
-0.825-0.825
-0.8-0.8
-0.775-0.775
-0.75-0.75
-0.725-0.725
-0.7-0.7
-0.675-0.675
-0.65-0.65
-0.625-0.625
-0.6-0.6
-0.575-0.575
-0.55-0.55
-0.525-0.525
-0.5-0.5
-0.475-0.475
-0.45-0.45
-0.425-0.425
-0.4-0.4
-0.375-0.375
-0.35-0.35
-0.325-0.325
-0.3-0.3
-0.275-0.275
-0.25-0.25
-0.225-0.225
-0.2-0.2
-0.175-0.175
-0.15-0.15
-0.125-0.125
-0.1-0.1
-0.075-0.075
-0.05-0.05
-0.025-0.025
00
0.0250.025
0.050.05
0.0750.075
0.10.1
0.1250.125
0.150.15
0.1750.175
0.20.2
0.2250.225
0.250.25
0.2750.275
0.30.3
0.3250.325
0.350.35
0.3750.375
0.40.4
0.4250.425
0.450.45
0.4750.475
0.50.5
0.5250.525
0.550.55
0.5750.575
0.60.6
0.6250.625
0.650.65
0.6750.675
0.70.7
0.7250.725
0.750.75
0.7750.775
0.80.8
0.8250.825
0.850.85
0.8750.875
0.90.9
0.9250.925
0.950.95
0.9750.975
11

At most 82 representative computed coordinates including endpoints; the plotted curve can use a finer grid. A table of a revealed generator is not independent measurement evidence.

Calculated quantities under the declared measurement model
QuantityValueUnit
Electric divergence1V/m²
Required charge density8.84194e-12C/m³
Magnetic divergence residual0T/m
Faraday residual for static electric field0V/m²
Ordinary Maxwell magnetic constraint satisfied1flag
Required current density along z0.7957747A/m²

These static fields require electric charge and current sources; they are not a source-free wave.

Gauss gives rho=epsilon0 div E. For static fields Ampere gives J=curl B/mu0 and Faraday requires curl E=0. The transverse magnetic gradient has curl B along z and zero divergence, compatible locally with the stated charge/current sources. The longitudinal alternative has nonzero div B when a is nonzero; introducing an electric current cannot fix that magnetic Gauss-law violation. A local compatible ansatz does not specify a finite global apparatus or boundary conditions.

Predict before inspecting the values. Save contrasting records with assumptions and one alternative explanation. This virtual display does not certify practical measurement technique.

These static fields require electric charge and current sources; they are not a source-free wave.

Gauss gives rho=epsilon0 div E. For static fields Ampere gives J=curl B/mu0 and Faraday requires curl E=0. The transverse magnetic gradient has curl B along z and zero divergence, compatible locally with the stated charge/current sources. The longitudinal alternative has nonzero div B when a is nonzero; introducing an electric current cannot fix that magnetic Gauss-law violation. A local compatible ansatz does not specify a finite global apparatus or boundary conditions.

Captures preserve recipes and replay their calculated results. They are synthetic model evidence, not physical measurements.

Understand

State geometry, sources and initial data

Maxwell equations can be used to audit a proposed field instead of merely generating a familiar wave. In a local Cartesian region take static E=(a x,0,0), where a has units V/m². Compare a transverse magnetic gradient B=(0,gx,0) with a longitudinal one B=(gx,0,0); the numerical coefficient g is a times 10⁻⁶ T/m under the explicitly linked teaching controls.

Derive the field or circuit relation

Gauss requires charge density rho=epsilon0a. For the transverse magnetic option, divergence is zero and curl B has z component g, so static Ampère requires Jz=g/mu0. The electric curl is zero, satisfying static Faraday. These nonzero fields therefore require sources; they are not source-free traveling waves simply because their local formulas are smooth.

Audit energy, uncertainty and domain

The longitudinal magnetic option has divergence g. When g is nonzero it violates ordinary magnetic Gauss law and is rejected rather than assigned an invented magnetic charge. An electric current term cannot repair this violation. At a=0 both fields vanish and the constraint passes. Even the locally compatible transverse option does not specify a finite global apparatus or its boundary conditions.

Worked original case

At a=1 V/m² with the transverse magnetic option, required charge density is epsilon0 C/m³ and current density is 10⁻⁶/mu0=1/(0.4π)≈0.795775 A/m² along positive z. Switching to the longitudinal magnetic gradient leaves div B=10⁻⁶ T/m, so the ordinary Maxwell model rejects it.

Investigation

Compare transverse and longitudinal gradients at positive, negative and zero coefficient. Compute divergences and curls before assigning sources. Keep electric Gauss, magnetic Gauss, Faraday and Ampère as separate checks rather than claiming that one passing equation validates the whole field.

Changed-case practice

Try the changed case before feedback

For a=−2 V/m² with the transverse option, find required charge density divided by epsilon0.

This practice is public and unsaved. A matching number does not verify understanding. Retain your explanation, assumptions and changed-case evidence in the separate course workspace.

Sources and boundaries

Original derivations and synthetic evidence checked 31 October 2026 against the primary explanation. Constants are rounded teaching values and are mutually consistent where Maxwell relations require it. No live circuit, high-voltage, energized-inductor, magnet, beam or optical exposure activity is requested. Retain first work, criterion-linked critique, revision and newly assigned evidence; public numerical feedback is not practical or learner certification.

Apply

Can a suitable electric current repair a nonzero divergence of B in ordinary Maxwell theory?

Public practice checks a specific claim. It does not establish independent mastery.

Which source, initial-state, calibration or field-law premise makes the result conditional, and what unused evidence would challenge it?

Continue

Completion requires a saved prediction, at least one capture and a reflection. Presence checks do not grade your reasoning.

Skipping retains experiments and awards no mastery.

Save a science backup or import one

Science work is stored locally in this browser, separately from mathematics and AI. It does not sync automatically. Use this science-only backup; this checkout's older all-subject export does not include science.

A legacy file is available only when the complete snapshot fits the 36 MB limit. For larger snapshots, prepare a complete file set below; never discard notebooks to make a smaller file.

Matching imported notebook drafts replace their current drafts. Omitted lessons and known first attempts remain. Export your current work first if you want to retain both drafts.

Complete file sets and course backups

A file set can hold more work than one science file. Keep its manifest and every part together. Each file is limited to 36 MB. This format needs this version of LearnAI or a compatible newer version; older versions can use only the legacy single-file backup above.

The set includes every saved science course and global continuation at this moment. Later edits need a new export. A conflicting tab exports its own visible work, which may differ from saved work in another tab.

0 file(s) selected. File order and filenames do not determine identity. Missing, changed or conflicting parts block the entire restore; no good part is applied by itself.

Science storage: loading. No account or remote computation is required.