Learn

Learning preferences

Make learning more comfortable. Changes apply immediately.

Enlarges page content, including diagrams and their labels. You can also use your browser’s zoom.

Choose the colours that are easiest for you to distinguish. Applies to lesson diagrams and lab plots. Labels, shapes, hatching and line patterns also distinguish meanings. Source photographs and raw image brightness stay unchanged; mask-only views are available for image overlays.

ExampleComparisonSample link

Saved in this browser on this device. Preferences are separate from progress backups.

SCIENCE · INVESTIGATE AND EXPLAIN

Explain why dissolution is a balance of competing effects

Combine lattice, hydration and entropy terms without claiming a universal dissolution sign.

Learning outcome: Combine lattice, hydration and entropy terms without claiming a universal dissolution sign.

Starting recap

Breaking solute interactions costs energy; new solute-solvent interactions release energy.

All lessons are open directly. Your saved experiments remain when you leave and return.

Try

A hypothetical salt has lattice cost 650 and hydration release 650 kJ/mol, with assigned positive entropy.

Open the experiment

Predict

Must an endothermic dissolution be unfavorable?

Experiment

Compare equal cost/release with cost 700 and release 650, then reverse those values. Explain why a large computed ideal solubility is not automatically physically plausible.

Balance dissolution contributions

Worked teaching model · synthetic values · Hypothetical 1:1 salt, ideal activities and pure solid present; ΔS° dissolution assigned +50 J/(mol K), T=298.15 K. ΔH° is lattice cost minus hydration release. This two-term model does not predict real salts or make entropy universally positive.

Reset keeps your prediction, captures and practice history.

Conditional calculations, not measured observations
QuantityValueUnit
Lattice cost650kJ/mol
Hydration contribution-650kJ/mol
ΔH° dissolution0kJ/mol
ΔG° dissolution-14.9075kJ/mol
log10 Ksp2.611681decade

Products favored relative to the assigned standard state.

Small differences between large contributions control the result. Actual dissolution also depends on Q versus Ksp and inventory. Ideal 1:1 solubility s satisfies Ksp=(s/c°)² only with pure water, no common ion, and ideal activities; extremely large predicted s invalidates dilute-solution assumptions.

Predict before changing a control. Save two contrasting captures and explain what is held fixed. Displayed digits are calculation precision, not experimental uncertainty.

Products favored relative to the assigned standard state.

Small differences between large contributions control the result. Actual dissolution also depends on Q versus Ksp and inventory. Ideal 1:1 solubility s satisfies Ksp=(s/c°)² only with pure water, no common ion, and ideal activities; extremely large predicted s invalidates dilute-solution assumptions.

Captures preserve recipes and replay their calculated results. They are synthetic model evidence, not physical measurements.

Understand

Do not inspect only one contribution

Dissolving an ionic solid separates ions from their lattice, reorganizes solvent molecules and establishes ion-solvent interactions. A schematic energy path can separate positive lattice-separation work from negative hydration contributions. The net enthalpy may be positive or negative. Dispersing ions also competes with changes in solvent organization, so dissolution entropy is not universally positive.

The lab assigns a deliberately simplified 1:1 salt and ΔS°=+50 J/(mol K). It computes ΔH° as lattice cost minus the positive magnitude of hydration release, then ΔG°=ΔH°−TΔS° at 298.15 K. These are fictional design variables, not a reference database for identifying salts.

Cancellation and sensitivity

With cost and release both 650 kJ/mol, net ΔH° is zero while ΔG°≈−14.908 kJ/mol. Raising the cost to 700 makes ΔH°=+50 and ΔG°≈+35.093. Lowering the cost to 600 gives ΔH°=−50 and ΔG°≈−64.908. Relatively modest changes in two large opposing terms can reverse the conclusion.

Before changing a control, predict the sign. Afterwards, explain which contribution dominates. A model that reproduces a net result while using incorrect large contributions may fail badly under a changed solvent or temperature. A correct-looking net number is not independent validation of every assumed microscopic term.

From a standard-state difference to saturation

For MX(s)⇌M⁺(aq)+X⁻(aq), pure solid has unit activity when it is present. Ksp is the product of the ion activities, and ΔG°diss=−RT ln Ksp. Actual direction depends on Q relative to Ksp. A positive ΔG° does not mean that absolutely no solid dissolves into initially pure water: when the ion product is very small, dissolution may still lower G until saturation or solid exhaustion.

Under ideal dilute conditions in pure water, with no common ion, set both ion concentrations to s and normalize by c°: Ksp=(s/c°)². This relation is not a license to accept an astronomically high concentration. Such a prediction violates the model’s dilute-activity assumptions and requires a better model.

Transfer

An experiment finds a cold solution after dissolution. Does that prove low solubility? No. Cooling suggests heat was absorbed under the apparatus conditions, but neither entropy nor the activity-dependent free energy has been determined. Identify the separate equilibrium measurement needed, and explain why a thermometer alone cannot establish Ksp.

Source scope and continuation

Original teaching explanation, calculations and practice. Framework alignment: AP Chemistry topic 9.6 in the College Board course framework, effective Fall 2024, checked 30 October 2026. These pages do not reproduce restricted examination questions or establish AP authorization. The investigation is a bounded computational model, not a conducted laboratory.

Return to the preceding Unit 9 lesson when its reasoning is unfamiliar.

Continue to Require a mechanism before adding favorable reactions.

Apply

A salt has ΔH°diss=+10 kJ/mol and ΔS°diss=+50 J/(mol K) at 300 K. ΔG°diss is:

Public practice checks a specific claim. It does not establish independent mastery.

Show your calculation or representation, explain the changed case, and separate the stated model from measured evidence. Combine lattice, hydration and entropy terms without claiming a universal dissolution sign.

Continue

Completion requires a saved prediction, at least one capture and a reflection. Presence checks do not grade your reasoning.

Skipping retains experiments and awards no mastery.

Save a science backup or import one

Science work is stored locally in this browser, separately from mathematics and AI. It does not sync automatically. Use this science-only backup; this checkout's older all-subject export does not include science.

A legacy file is available only when the complete snapshot fits the 36 MB limit. For larger snapshots, prepare a complete file set below; never discard notebooks to make a smaller file.

Matching imported notebook drafts replace their current drafts. Omitted lessons and known first attempts remain. Export your current work first if you want to retain both drafts.

Complete file sets and course backups

A file set can hold more work than one science file. Keep its manifest and every part together. Each file is limited to 36 MB. This format needs this version of LearnAI or a compatible newer version; older versions can use only the legacy single-file backup above.

The set includes every saved science course and global continuation at this moment. Later edits need a new export. A conflicting tab exports its own visible work, which may differ from saved work in another tab.

0 file(s) selected. File order and filenames do not determine identity. Missing, changed or conflicting parts block the entire restore; no good part is applied by itself.

Science storage: loading. No account or remote computation is required.