Construct a composition that satisfies both equilibrium and conservation
Build independent A and B concentrations, distinguish reaction events from species changes, and reject a rate-balanced mixture with the wrong conserved inventory.
Learning outcome: Use unequal stoichiometry, opposing rates and a reaction quotient to justify an equilibrium composition for a specified closed batch.
Starting recap
For 2A ⇌ B, one forward event consumes two A units and forms one B. B contains two conserved units, so A + 2B is fixed at constant volume.
All lessons are open directly. Your saved experiments remain when you leave and return.
Try
A proposal has equal forward and reverse rates. Is that enough to identify the equilibrium of a batch containing a specified amount of material?
Open the experimentPredict
Predict whether equal concentrations are necessary for equilibrium and whether equal rates can coexist with the wrong batch inventory.
Experiment
Start with A = B = 0.50 in the first packet. Change A to zero and B to 0.50: this conserves the batch but does not balance rates. Repair both concentrations. Compare the second packet, where equal concentrations do work. Construct the transfer packet without first opening the solution. Capture one rejected proposal and a repaired composition.
Construct an equilibrium that also conserves material
Worked teaching model · synthetic values · Original hypothetical elementary 2A ⇌ B model at fixed temperature and volume. B contains two conserved A units. Forward event rate kf[A]² and reverse event rate kr[B] are stipulated; kf has units L/(mol s), kr has units s⁻¹. Ideal activities use c° = 1 mol/L. No measured species, competing reaction, time trajectory or general deduction of rate laws from net equations is claimed.
Reset keeps your prediction, captures and practice history.
Build both concentrations independently
Reaction: 2A ⇌ B. Each B contains two conserved A units. This batch requires [A] + 2[B] = 1.00 mol/L. Changing the proposal does not add material to the target batch.
| Quantity | Proposal | Required check |
|---|---|---|
| [A] | 0.50 mol/L | One conserved unit per A |
| [B] | 0.50 mol/L | Two conserved units per B |
| [A] + 2[B] | 1.50 mol/L | 1.00 mol/L; fails |
Assigned kf = 0.5 L/(mol s); kr = 0.5 s⁻¹. These are elementary event rates, normalized to one occurrence of the reaction as written.
| Rate | Calculation | mol/(L s) |
|---|---|---|
| Forward event rate | 0.5 × 0.50² | 0.12500 |
| Reverse event rate | 0.5 × 0.50 | 0.25000 |
| Net B change | forward − reverse | -0.12500 |
| Net A change | −2 × (forward − reverse) | 0.25000 |
Rate balance: fails. Batch inventory: fails. This proposal is not an equilibrium composition for the selected batch. A rate-balanced mixture with the wrong inventory could describe a different batch.
With c° = 1 mol/L, Q = ([B]/c°)/([A]/c°)² and K = kfc°/kr = 1. Q = 2.00000.
Check the equilibrium solution and model limits
For the selected inventory, substituting [B] = K[A]²/c° gives 2K[A]²/c° + [A] − M = 0. Its nonnegative solution is [A] = 0.50000 mol/L and [B] = 0.25000 mol/L. Equal concentrations are neither necessary nor sufficient in general. At equilibrium both opposing processes continue; their net species changes vanish.
The grid constructs candidate states; it does not simulate how a closed batch reaches them. Net A and B changes have different magnitudes because two A units participate per event. An actual non-elementary net reaction does not generally have these rate laws. All constants and batch quantities here are original teaching premises, not experimental estimates.
Check material conservation and rate balance separately: both are required.
Inventory residual 0.500 mol/L; forward 0.1250, reverse 0.2500 mol/(L s). Net species changes: A 0.2500, B -0.1250 mol/(L s).
Captures preserve recipes and replay their calculated results. They are synthetic model evidence, not physical measurements.
Understand
Apply
Public practice checks a specific claim. It does not establish independent mastery.
Explain the two independent acceptance checks, the factor of two in species rates, and why Q is undefined for an empty proposal. State why these elementary rate laws cannot be inferred for an arbitrary net reaction.
Continue
Completion requires a saved prediction, at least one capture and a reflection. Presence checks do not grade your reasoning.
Skipping retains experiments and awards no mastery.
Save a science backup or import one
Science work is stored locally in this browser, separately from mathematics and AI. It does not sync automatically. Use this science-only backup; this checkout's older all-subject export does not include science.
A legacy file is available only when the complete snapshot fits the 36 MB limit. For larger snapshots, prepare a complete file set below; never discard notebooks to make a smaller file.
Matching imported notebook drafts replace their current drafts. Omitted lessons and known first attempts remain. Export your current work first if you want to retain both drafts.
Complete file sets and course backups
A file set can hold more work than one science file. Keep its manifest and every part together. Each file is limited to 36 MB. This format needs this version of LearnAI or a compatible newer version; older versions can use only the legacy single-file backup above.
The set includes every saved science course and global continuation at this moment. Later edits need a new export. A conflicting tab exports its own visible work, which may differ from saved work in another tab.
0 file(s) selected. File order and filenames do not determine identity. Missing, changed or conflicting parts block the entire restore; no good part is applied by itself.
Science storage: loading. No account or remote computation is required.