Learn

Learning preferences

Make learning more comfortable. Changes apply immediately.

Enlarges page content, including diagrams and their labels. You can also use your browser’s zoom.

Choose the colours that are easiest for you to distinguish. Applies to lesson diagrams and lab plots. Labels, shapes, hatching and line patterns also distinguish meanings. Source photographs and raw image brightness stay unchanged; mask-only views are available for image overlays.

ExampleComparisonSample link

Saved in this browser on this device. Preferences are separate from progress backups.

SCIENCE · INVESTIGATE AND EXPLAIN

Test when a pre-equilibrium substitution is defensible

Derive an intermediate substitution, compare exact held-input relaxation and distinguish transient error from persistent consumption.

Learning outcome: Use a fast reversible-step approximation with explicit assumptions and diagnose when intermediate drain or short observation time invalidates it.

Starting recap

A reversible step has forward and reverse fluxes. A nearly steady intermediate need not be at equilibrium if another step consumes it.

All lessons are open directly. Your saved experiments remain when you leave and return.

Try

R forms I reversibly while I reacts with S. Does waiting make forward and reverse rates equal when I continues draining into product?

Open the experiment

Predict

Predict whether waiting longer repairs an approximation when drain equals reversal. Compare this with observing a reversal-dominant packet too early.

Experiment

Compare zero, one and ten relaxation times. Change the drain/reversal scenario and inspect supply, return and product fluxes separately. Capture an approximation within the stated tolerance and one that cannot pass even at late time.

Test the pre-equilibrium approximation against intermediate balance

Worked teaching model · synthetic values · Original open-system teaching model R ⇌ I, I + S → P. External reservoirs hold free R = 0.100 mol/L and S fixed, with product removed and I initially zero. kf = 0.010 s⁻¹ and k2 = 1 L mol⁻¹ s⁻¹ are stipulated. The exact linear intermediate balance applies only under these held-input assumptions; it is not a closed-batch simulation or measured chemical equilibrium.

Reset keeps your prediction, captures and practice history.

R ⇌ I, followed by I + S → P

R and I are hypothetical forms with the same composition; P contains the combined R and S material. External reservoirs hold free [R] = 0.100 mol/L and [S] = 0.1 mol/L. Product is removed. This is an open, held-input model; a closed batch would deplete reactants and require different equations.

Forward constant kf = 0.010 s⁻¹, reverse kr = 100 s⁻¹, and second-step k₂ = 1 L mol⁻¹ s⁻¹. The intermediate starts at zero. Its supply is kf[R] = 0.001 mol L⁻¹ s⁻¹; its two removal coefficients are kr and k₂[S] = 0.1 s⁻¹.

Derive, then challenge, the substitution

Ignoring consumption by step 2 would set kf[R] ≈ kr[I], giving [I]pre = (kf/kr)[R] = 0.00001 mol/L. Substituting into r = k₂[I][S] gives rpre = k₂(kf/kr)[R][S] = 0.000001 mol L⁻¹ s⁻¹. This is an approximation, not an equilibrium guaranteed merely by a reversible arrow.

TermValue /mol L⁻¹ s⁻¹
Supply from R0.001
Return to R0.00063148907
Drain to P6.3148907e-7
Accumulation: supply − return − drain0.00036787944

Relaxation time τ = 1/(kr+k₂[S]) = 0.00999001 s. Selected elapsed time is 1τ = 0.00999001 s. The exact held-input solution gives [I] = 0.0000063148907 mol/L and product rate 6.3148907e-7 mol L⁻¹ s⁻¹. At late time, supply equals return plus drain, not return alone.

[I]/[I]pre = product rate / rpreapprox. 100.250.50.751013510Elapsed time / τ; circle is selected time

Consumption/reversal ratio ε = k₂[S]/kr = 0.001. Even after full relaxation, the approximation overpredicts the exact rate by 0.1% relative to that exact rate. At the selected time, relative error is 58.355868%. Not within the chosen 5% teaching tolerance. No universal validity cutoff is asserted.

Compare early and late times in the reversal-dominant packet, then wait equally many relaxation times with drain equal to reversal. A small ε needs time to relax; waiting longer cannot remove a large ε error. The time axis is scaled by τ, so equal horizontal positions need not mean equal seconds across packets.

Optional derivation and sources

The held-input balance is d[I]/dt = kf[R] − (kr+k₂[S])[I]. With I initially zero its solution is [I]∞(1−exp(−t/τ)), where [I]∞ = kf[R]/(kr+k₂[S]). Dividing by [I]pre gives (1−exp(−t/τ))/(1+ε). The late-time relative overprediction is exactly ε. The system still produces P, so its steady intermediate inventory is not global chemical equilibrium.

OpenStax Chemistry 2e §12.6 explains eliminating an intermediate using a fast reversible step. Constants, reservoirs and tolerance here are original teaching assumptions, not measured kinetics or proof of a real mechanism.

Approximation exceeds the explicitly chosen 5% rate tolerance at this time.

A small consumption/reversal ratio is not enough before relaxation; waiting cannot repair a large persistent drain error. This tolerance is a teaching choice, not a universal chemical criterion.

Captures retain original held-input scenarios and relaxation-time settings. Replay checks approximation error and flux balance; it does not measure chemical equilibrium or validate a real mechanism.

Understand

Try: does a reversible arrow guarantee equilibrium?

In the original hypothetical route R ⇌ I, I + S → P, the intermediate I is both returned to R and consumed into P. Predict which competing flux can prevent the first step from staying near equilibrium. Begin at zero elapsed time, then inspect one and ten relaxation times.

Derive the proposed approximation

Write kf and kr for first-order forward and reverse constants, and k₂ for the second-step bimolecular constant. If forward and reverse fluxes nearly balance, kf[R] ≈ kr[I]. Substitute [I] ≈ (kf/kr)[R] into product rate r=k₂[I][S], giving r ≈ k₂(kf/kr)[R][S]. The intermediate disappears from the expression because of an additional approximation, not by copying overall coefficients.

Experiment with two different failures

The reversal-dominant packet has ε=k₂[S]/kr=0.001. Its late-time approximation error is only 0.1%, but at one relaxation time the intermediate has not finished building up. At ten relaxation times the error is about 0.104545%. In contrast, equal drain and reversal give ε=1 and a persistent late-time overprediction of 100%. Waiting cannot fix that missing drain term.

The chosen 5% tolerance is a teaching decision, not a universal chemistry rule. At time zero the exact product rate is zero and relative error is undefined; the interface does not invent a finite percentage.

Understand the exact comparison

External reservoirs explicitly maintain free R and S; product is removed. This is not a closed batch. With I initially zero, the intermediate balance is d[I]/dt=kf[R]−(kr+k₂[S])[I]. Its relaxation time is τ=1/(kr+k₂[S]). A steady intermediate satisfies supply = return + drain, while global equilibrium would have no sustained product flux. The optional derivation in the visual gives the exact solution under these held-input assumptions.

The normalized graph compares different scenarios on the same zero-to-one scale. Its time coordinate is t/τ, not seconds. Read the adjacent conversion before comparing physical waiting times. Temperature, volume and constants remain fixed within each scenario; no actual mechanism is experimentally established.

Apply and continue

Capture a small-drain case after relaxation and an equal-drain case after the same number of relaxation times. Explain why only one passes the declared tolerance. Transfer the late-time error relation to ε=0.20 in practice. Return to elementary-mechanism construction to contrast a first slow step with this intermediate-elimination problem.

OpenStax Chemistry 2e §12.6 supplies the pre-equilibrium reasoning. The numerical model and tolerance are original teaching assumptions. Empirical evidence, closed-batch depletion, competing pathways, collision orientation and multistep energy profiles remain outside this activity.

Apply

In a fresh held-input model, k₂[S]/kr = 0.20. At sufficiently late time, how far does the pre-equilibrium rate exceed the exact rate?

Public practice checks a specific claim. It does not establish independent mastery.

Derive the intermediate-free approximate rate law, identify its assumptions, and distinguish a steady intermediate from global equilibrium. Explain why equal relaxation-time multiples do not imply equal seconds.

Continue

Completion requires a saved prediction, at least one capture and a reflection. Presence checks do not grade your reasoning.

Skipping retains experiments and awards no mastery.

Save a science backup or import one

Science work is stored locally in this browser, separately from mathematics and AI. It does not sync automatically. Use this science-only backup; this checkout's older all-subject export does not include science.

A legacy file is available only when the complete snapshot fits the 36 MB limit. For larger snapshots, prepare a complete file set below; never discard notebooks to make a smaller file.

Matching imported notebook drafts replace their current drafts. Omitted lessons and known first attempts remain. Export your current work first if you want to retain both drafts.

Complete file sets and course backups

A file set can hold more work than one science file. Keep its manifest and every part together. Each file is limited to 36 MB. This format needs this version of LearnAI or a compatible newer version; older versions can use only the legacy single-file backup above.

The set includes every saved science course and global continuation at this moment. Later edits need a new export. A conflicting tab exports its own visible work, which may differ from saved work in another tab.

0 file(s) selected. File order and filenames do not determine identity. Missing, changed or conflicting parts block the entire restore; no good part is applied by itself.

Science storage: loading. No account or remote computation is required.