Learn

Learning preferences

Make learning more comfortable. Changes apply immediately.

Enlarges page content, including diagrams and their labels. You can also use your browser’s zoom.

Choose the colours that are easiest for you to distinguish. Applies to lesson diagrams and lab plots. Labels, shapes, hatching and line patterns also distinguish meanings. Source photographs and raw image brightness stay unchanged; mask-only views are available for image overlays.

ExampleComparisonSample link

Saved in this browser on this device. Preferences are separate from progress backups.

SCIENCE · INVESTIGATE AND EXPLAIN

Recover center motion from an internal-force audit

Compare individual trajectories with the externally driven center of a fixed material system.

Learning outcome: Compare A=0,b=0 with A=2,b=1. Derive individual and center trajectories, retain both initial center conditions, and identify why internal forces cannot supply the external impulse. Analyze the two conveyor inflow velocities as a written boundary check.

Starting recap

Integrate net external force, preserve vector and system boundaries, and test collision and evidence assumptions independently.

All lessons are open directly. Your saved experiments remain when you leave and return.

Try

A=2,b=1 gives external impulse 6 N s and total final momentum 7 kg m/s. Center velocity 7/5 m/s follows independently from the weighted particle velocities.

Open the experiment

Predict

Can reciprocal internal forces change center acceleration without changing the external force history?

Experiment

Compare A=0,b=0 with A=2,b=1. Derive individual and center trajectories, retain both initial center conditions, and identify why internal forces cannot supply the external impulse. Analyze the two conveyor inflow velocities as a written boundary check.

Recover center motion from internal and external forces

Worked teaching model · synthetic values · Two mathematical point particles m1=2,m2=3; initial x1=−1,x2=2 m,v1=2,v2=−1 m/s. Prescribed reciprocal internal forces +3 and−3 N; external A+bt on particle2. No rigid/taut constraint or real interaction mechanism implied; evaluate0–2 s.

Reset keeps your prediction, captures and practice history.

Integrated center position

center position (m)time (s)022.266670

Axes rescale independently. Curves join sampled coordinates; a joining segment is not additional measured evidence. Read physical units rather than screen angles or apparent slopes.

Integrated center position: numerical coordinates
time (s)center position (m)
00.8
0.050.810504
0.10.822033
0.150.834612
0.20.848267
0.250.863021
0.30.8789
0.350.895929
0.40.914133
0.450.933538
0.50.954167
0.550.976046
0.60.9992
0.651.02365
0.71.04943
0.751.07656
0.81.10507
0.851.13497
0.91.1663
0.951.19908
11.23333
1.051.26909
1.11.30637
1.151.3452
1.21.3856
1.251.4276
1.31.47123
1.351.51651
1.41.56347
1.451.61212
1.51.6625
1.551.71463
1.61.76853
1.651.82424
1.71.88177
1.751.94115
1.82.0024
1.852.06555
1.92.13063
1.952.19766
22.26667
Calculated values under the declared model
QuantityValueUnit
Particle 1 position at 2 s6m
Particle 2 position at 2 s-0.222222m
Weighted center position2.26667m
Total final momentum7kg m/s
Center velocity1.4m/s
External impulse over interval6N s
Center acceleration at 2 s0.8m/s²

Reciprocal internal forces can redistribute particle motion without changing total momentum directly.

The weighted individual trajectories equal xCM=.8+.2t+A t²/10+b t³/30. This requires a fixed set of constant masses. An open mass-flow boundary needs additional momentum flux accounting; simply differentiating Mv while ignoring exchanged matter is not justified.

Derive before checking. Retain contrasting captures and explain one assumption that could fail; calculated evidence is not actual laboratory work.

Reciprocal internal forces can redistribute particle motion without changing total momentum directly.

The weighted individual trajectories equal xCM=.8+.2t+A t²/10+b t³/30. This requires a fixed set of constant masses. An open mass-flow boundary needs additional momentum flux accounting; simply differentiating Mv while ignoring exchanged matter is not justified.

Captures preserve recipes and replay their calculated results. They are synthetic model evidence, not physical measurements.

Understand

Choose a fixed material boundary

For constant masses, xCM=(sum mi xi)/M. Differentiating gives M vCM=sum mi vi=P. Differentiating again gives M aCM=sum Fi. Reciprocal internal forces cancel in this last sum; only net external force changes total momentum. Internal interactions still change individual motions and can change relative kinetic energy.

Write both recipient equations

Our two point particles have masses 2 and 3 kg, initial positions−1 and 2 m and velocities 2 and−1 m/s. A prescribed internal interaction gives forces+3 and−3 N. Only particle 2 also receives external force A+bt. Thus a 1=3/2 and a 2=(A+bt−3)/3. No rigid separation or taut connector is imposed; equal acceleration is not assumed.

Integrate and then average

The individual positions are x 1=−1+2t+3t²/4 and x 2=2−t+(A−3)t²/6+bt³/18. Weighting them gives xCM=.8+.2t+At²/10+bt³/30. Alternatively, integrate aCM=(A+bt)/5 with xCM(0)=.8 and vCM(0)=.2. Agreement is an algebraic consistency check between two accounts of the same supplied model.

Test internal redistribution

For A=2,b=1,t=2, x 1=6 and x 2=−2/9 m. Their weighted center is 34/15 m. Total momentum is initial 1 plus external impulse 6, or 7 kg m/s. Different internal force choices could change both individual positions while leaving the same center history, provided the reciprocal forces and external history remain consistent.

Handle increasing carried mass explicitly

A conveyor holds collected material at constant horizontal speed V=3 m/s while receiving material with zero horizontal velocity at rate 2 kg/s. The drive must deliver horizontal momentum 6 N s each second, so its required horizontal force is 6 N. The stored carried momentum grows at V dm/dt, despite zero acceleration of the already-moving part. If incoming material instead already moves at 3 m/s, it carries that momentum into the boundary and no such horizontal transfer is needed. This changed-input case shows why an open-system inventory derivative alone is not a universal force rule.

Worked original case

A=2,b=1 gives external impulse 6 N s and total final momentum 7 kg m/s. Center velocity 7/5 m/s follows independently from the weighted particle velocities.

Investigation

Compare A=0,b=0 with A=2,b=1. Derive individual and center trajectories, retain both initial center conditions, and identify why internal forces cannot supply the external impulse. Analyze the two conveyor inflow velocities as a written boundary check.

Public numerical transfer practice

Try a new practice case

A 5 kg fixed-mass system receives external impulse 10 N s from initial center velocity−1 m/s. What is final center velocity?

This public, unsaved check is not a secure assessment. Explain the derivative, integral or boundary in the retained course evidence workspace.

Sources and evidence boundary

Original content checked 30 October 2026 against the official AP Physics C Mechanics framework and OpenStax University Physics momentum. Packets are supplied/generated, not performed collisions or instrument measurements. No physical impact, release, explosive materials or moving machinery is requested. Public solutions and virtual captures do not certify independent mastery or supervised laboratory work.

Apply

Can reciprocal internal forces change center acceleration without changing the external force history?

Public practice checks a specific claim. It does not establish independent mastery.

When is treating a changing material inventory as a fixed-mass point object invalid?

Continue

Completion requires a saved prediction, at least one capture and a reflection. Presence checks do not grade your reasoning.

Skipping retains experiments and awards no mastery.

Save a science backup or import one

Science work is stored locally in this browser, separately from mathematics and AI. It does not sync automatically. Use this science-only backup; this checkout's older all-subject export does not include science.

A legacy file is available only when the complete snapshot fits the 36 MB limit. For larger snapshots, prepare a complete file set below; never discard notebooks to make a smaller file.

Matching imported notebook drafts replace their current drafts. Omitted lessons and known first attempts remain. Export your current work first if you want to retain both drafts.

Complete file sets and course backups

A file set can hold more work than one science file. Keep its manifest and every part together. Each file is limited to 36 MB. This format needs this version of LearnAI or a compatible newer version; older versions can use only the legacy single-file backup above.

The set includes every saved science course and global continuation at this moment. Later edits need a new export. A conflicting tab exports its own visible work, which may differ from saved work in another tab.

0 file(s) selected. File order and filenames do not determine identity. Missing, changed or conflicting parts block the entire restore; no good part is applied by itself.

Science storage: loading. No account or remote computation is required.