Learning preferences

Make learning more comfortable. Changes apply immediately.

Enlarges page content, including diagrams and their labels. You can also use your browser’s zoom.

Choose the colours that are easiest for you to distinguish. Applies to lesson diagrams and lab plots. Labels, shapes, hatching and line patterns also distinguish meanings. Source photographs and raw image brightness stay unchanged; mask-only views are available for image overlays.

ExampleComparisonSample link

Saved in this browser on this device. Preferences are separate from progress backups.

SCIENCE · INVESTIGATE AND EXPLAIN

Integrate rotational energy without double counting

Normalize a mass distribution before integrating local kinetic energy.

Learning outcome: Compare beta=0,1,2 at omega=2. Integrate the normalized density independently, calculate the two energy decompositions and verify their sums. Reverse omega and retain the changed angular-momentum sign alongside unchanged energy. Explain why holding lambda0 fixed would answer a different question.

Starting recap

State the reference axis and system, distinguish time and angle integrals, and verify an accessible and supported motion branch.

All lessons are open directly. Your saved experiments remain when you leave and return.

Try

At beta=0, Iend=4 kg m² and xCM=1 m. With omega=2 rad/s, K=8 J. The center contribution is 6 J and center-axis contribution is 2 J. Adding another 6 J to the endpoint result would count the same motion twice.

Open the experiment

Predict

If endpoint-axis rotational energy is known, should center translational energy be added again?

Experiment

Compare beta=0,1,2 at omega=2. Integrate the normalized density independently, calculate the two energy decompositions and verify their sums. Reverse omega and retain the changed angular-momentum sign alongside unchanged energy. Explain why holding lambda0 fixed would answer a different question.

Integrate rotational kinetic energy at fixed mass

Worked teaching model · synthetic values · Slender rod length 2 m,mass 3 kg,lambda=lambda0(1+beta x/2),normalized at each beta. Rotation about perpendicular fixed endpoint axis. No center translation is separately added to this endpoint-axis energy.

Reset keeps your prediction, captures and practice history.

Rotational kinetic-energy density

dK/dx (J/m)position (m)02160

Axes rescale independently. Curves join sampled coordinates; a joining segment is not additional measured evidence. Read physical units rather than screen angles or apparent slopes.

Rotational kinetic-energy density: numerical coordinates
position (m)dK/dx (J/m)
00
0.050.005125
0.10.021
0.150.048375
0.20.088
0.250.140625
0.30.207
0.350.287875
0.40.384
0.450.496125
0.50.625
0.550.771375
0.60.936
0.651.11963
0.71.323
0.751.54688
0.81.792
0.852.05912
0.92.349
0.952.66237
13
1.053.36262
1.13.751
1.154.16587
1.24.608
1.255.07813
1.35.577
1.356.10538
1.46.664
1.457.25363
1.57.875
1.558.52888
1.69.216
1.659.93712
1.710.693
1.7511.4844
1.812.312
1.8513.1766
1.914.079
1.9515.0199
216
Calculated values under the declared model
QuantityValueUnit
Normalized base linear density1kg/m
End-axis rotational inertia4.66667kg m²
Total rotational kinetic energy9.33333J
Center translational contribution7.40741J
Rotation about center contribution1.92593J
Signed angular momentum about endpoint9.33333kg m²/s

Energy adds squared local speed over mass; reversing rotation does not change that quadratic sum.

The endpoint-axis energy already includes center motion. Its decomposition into center translation plus center-axis rotation follows the parallel-axis theorem; adding center translation again would double count. Density is normalized to fixed mass before comparing shape.

Derive before checking. Retain contrasting captures and explain one assumption that could fail; calculated evidence is not actual laboratory work.

Energy adds squared local speed over mass; reversing rotation does not change that quadratic sum.

The endpoint-axis energy already includes center motion. Its decomposition into center translation plus center-axis rotation follows the parallel-axis theorem; adding center translation again would double count. Density is normalized to fixed mass before comparing shape.

Captures preserve recipes and replay their calculated results. They are synthetic model evidence, not physical measurements.

Understand

Start with particles, not a memorized shape

For particles sharing a fixed-axis angular speed, each speed is v_i=r_i omega. Summing K_i=m_i v_i²/2 gives K=omega² Σm_i r_i²/2=I omega²/2. Energy is scalar and nonnegative; reversing every velocity reverses angular momentum but leaves kinetic energy unchanged. In the continuum, dK=(omega x)² dm/2 for a rod rotating about its perpendicular endpoint axis.

Hold mass fixed while changing shape

The model rod has M=3 kg, L=2 m and lambda(x)=lambda0(1+beta x/L). Normalize first: M=lambda0 L(1+beta/2), so lambda0=M/[L(1+beta/2)]. Then Iend=integral x² lambda dx=ML²(1/3+beta/4)/(1+beta/2). Comparing beta values without renormalizing would mix redistribution with adding material.

Separate center motion only once

The center is xCM=L(1/2+beta/3)/(1+beta/2). With Icm=Iend−M xCM² and vCM=omega xCM, K=Iend omega²/2=M vCM²/2+Icm omega²/2. These are two equivalent accounts, not three terms to add. The endpoint-axis expression already includes center translation. For general rigid planar motion, center translation plus center-axis rotation is the appropriate split.

Make a graph prediction

The plotted density dK/dx is proportional to x² lambda(x), not just lambda(x). Explain why the endpoint near the axis contributes little even when its mass density is nonzero. Predict what happens to the graph and area when omega doubles, and what happens when omega changes sign. Doubling speed multiplies every energy density by four; sign reversal leaves the graph unchanged.

Test a stationary center

A uniform disk with Icm=2 kg m² spins at 3 rad/s while its center stays fixed. Predict its energy before using the formula: K=9 J, despite zero center translational energy. The rim particles still move. Changing the spin to −3 rad/s leaves 9 J unchanged; kinetic energy has no clockwise or counterclockwise sign.

Worked original case

At beta=0, Iend=4 kg m² and xCM=1 m. With omega=2 rad/s, K=8 J. The center contribution is 6 J and center-axis contribution is 2 J. Adding another 6 J to the endpoint result would count the same motion twice.

Investigation

Compare beta=0,1,2 at omega=2. Integrate the normalized density independently, calculate the two energy decompositions and verify their sums. Reverse omega and retain the changed angular-momentum sign alongside unchanged energy. Explain why holding lambda0 fixed would answer a different question.

Public numerical transfer practice

Try a new practice case

A fixed-axis body has I=3 kg m² and omega=−4 rad/s. What is its rotational kinetic energy in joules?

This public, unsaved check is not a secure assessment. Explain the derivative, integral or boundary in the retained course evidence workspace.

Sources and evidence boundary

Original derivations and assigned numerical cases checked 30 October 2026 against the official AP Physics C Mechanics framework and OpenStax angular momentum. These are supplied or generated records, not physical measurements or performed laboratory time. Do not construct rotating equipment, release loads or conduct launch experiments. Public feedback and retained self-reports do not certify independent mastery.

Apply

If endpoint-axis rotational energy is known, should center translational energy be added again?

Public practice checks a specific claim. It does not establish independent mastery.

Which axis is associated with each inertia in your energy account?

Continue

Completion requires a saved prediction, at least one capture and a reflection. Presence checks do not grade your reasoning.

Skipping retains experiments and awards no mastery.

Save a science backup or import one

Science work is stored locally in this browser, separately from mathematics and AI. It does not sync automatically. Use this science-only backup; this checkout's older all-subject export does not include science.

A legacy file is available only when the complete snapshot fits the 36 MB limit. For larger snapshots, prepare a complete file set below; never discard notebooks to make a smaller file.

Matching imported notebook drafts replace their current drafts. Omitted lessons and known first attempts remain. Export your current work first if you want to retain both drafts.

Complete file sets and course backups

A file set can hold more work than one science file. Keep its manifest and every part together. Each file is limited to 36 MB. This format needs this version of LearnAI or a compatible newer version; older versions can use only the legacy single-file backup above.

The set includes every saved science course and global continuation at this moment. Later edits need a new export. A conflicting tab exports its own visible work, which may differ from saved work in another tab.

0 file(s) selected. File order and filenames do not determine identity. Missing, changed or conflicting parts block the entire restore; no good part is applied by itself.

Science storage: loading. No account or remote computation is required.