Learn

Learning preferences

Make learning more comfortable. Changes apply immediately.

Enlarges page content, including diagrams and their labels. You can also use your browser’s zoom.

Choose the colours that are easiest for you to distinguish. Applies to lesson diagrams and lab plots. Labels, shapes, hatching and line patterns also distinguish meanings. Source photographs and raw image brightness stay unchanged; mask-only views are available for image overlays.

ExampleComparisonSample link

Saved in this browser on this device. Preferences are separate from progress backups.

SCIENCE · INVESTIGATE AND EXPLAIN

Test support feasibility after integrating a distributed load

Require both force and torque balance, then check whether the assumed contacts can supply the reactions.

Learning outcome: Compare point positions 2 and 4 at a=0, then add distributed load a=4. Integrate its moment, solve both reactions and retain the feasibility flag. Sketch the failed assumed contact separately from any proposed new support model.

Starting recap

Declare the fixed axis, integrate the actual mass or load distribution, and test constraint feasibility before interpreting a numerical result.

All lessons are open directly. Your saved experiments remain when you leave and return.

Try

At a=1,b=2, total load 66 N, right reaction 101/3≈33.6667 N and left 97/3≈32.3333 N. Both contacts are feasible.

Open the experiment

Predict

Is solving the force and torque equations enough if a required upward-only support reaction is negative?

Experiment

Compare point positions 2 and 4 at a=0, then add distributed load a=4. Integrate its moment, solve both reactions and retain the feasibility flag. Sketch the failed assumed contact separately from any proposed new support model.

Test two support reactions under distributed loading

Worked teaching model · synthetic values · Rigid beam 0–4 m, own weight 20 N centered 2; extra downward density a(1+x/4) N/m and point weight 40 N at selected x. Upward-only supports at x=1 and 3. Signed required reactions are conditional; a negative one means assumed two-contact equilibrium is infeasible.

Reset keeps your prediction, captures and practice history.

Added downward load density

load per length (N/m)position (m)0420

Axes rescale independently. Curves join sampled coordinates; a joining segment is not additional measured evidence. Read physical units rather than screen angles or apparent slopes.

Added downward load density: numerical coordinates
position (m)load per length (N/m)
01
0.11.025
0.21.05
0.31.075
0.41.1
0.51.125
0.61.15
0.71.175
0.81.2
0.91.225
11.25
1.11.275
1.21.3
1.31.325
1.41.35
1.51.375
1.61.4
1.71.425
1.81.45
1.91.475
21.5
2.11.525
2.21.55
2.31.575
2.41.6
2.51.625
2.61.65
2.71.675
2.81.7
2.91.725
31.75
3.11.775
3.21.8
3.31.825
3.41.85
3.51.875
3.61.9
3.71.925
3.81.95
3.91.975
42
Calculated values under the declared model
QuantityValueUnit
Total downward force66N
Required left upward reaction32.3333N
Required right upward reaction33.6667N
Torque balance about left support0N m
Both unilateral supports feasible1flag
Combined downward-force coordinate2.0202m

Force and torque balance are necessary; the assumed contact directions must also be feasible.

Integrate added load to6a N and moment about x=0 to40a/3 N m. Support positions1 and 3 m set Rright=(moment−W)/2. A negative required upward-only reaction means the two-contact equilibrium model fails and lift-off or another constraint must be analyzed, not that a surface pulls downward.

Derive before checking. Retain contrasting captures and explain one assumption that could fail; calculated evidence is not actual laboratory work.

Force and torque balance are necessary; the assumed contact directions must also be feasible.

Integrate added load to6a N and moment about x=0 to40a/3 N m. Support positions1 and 3 m set Rright=(moment−W)/2. A negative required upward-only reaction means the two-contact equilibrium model fails and lift-off or another constraint must be analyzed, not that a surface pulls downward.

Captures preserve recipes and replay their calculated results. They are synthetic model evidence, not physical measurements.

Understand

Draw the external interactions

A rigid beam spans 0–4 m. Its own 20 N weight acts at x=2; an added downward load density is a(1+x/4) N/m; a 40 N point load acts at the selected coordinate. Upward-only supports sit at x=1 and 3. Each load belongs on the beam’s recipient diagram; the equal-and-opposite forces on supports do not cancel them within that diagram.

L at x=1R at x=320 N at x=240 N at variable bq(x), downward04 m

This is a recipient force inventory, not a scale drawing of one control setting. The point-load arrow marks a variable position; use the selected numerical b rather than its schematic screen coordinate. The distributed-load arrows identify a density, not extra forces to add after its integral has already been included.

Integrate load and its first moment

The added load integrates to 6a N. Its moment about x=0 is integral x a(1+x/4)dx=40a/3 N m. Total downward force is W=60+6a and its total moment is 40+40a/3+40b, where b is the point-load coordinate. A distributed load must be located by its first moment, not placed arbitrarily at the geometric midpoint.

Solve two independent balances

Let left and right upward reactions be L and R. Vertical balance gives L+R=W. Taking torque about the left support at x=1 gives 2R=moment−W. Thus R=−10+11a/3+20b and L=70+7a/3−20b in newtons. Choosing a support as origin removes its own torque, not its force from the force balance.

Reject an impossible contact branch

At a=0,b=2 both reactions are 30 N. Move the point load to b=4 and the required right reaction becomes 70 while left becomes−10. An upward-only surface cannot supply that negative reaction. The assumed two-contact static equilibrium has failed; lift-off or another constraint must be modeled. Do not simply change the negative number to zero while retaining all the same equilibrium equations.

Separate rotational from translational equilibrium

Zero net torque permits constant angular velocity, not necessarily rest, for the fixed rigid-axis setting. Zero net force permits constant center velocity. A body can satisfy one condition without the other: a pure couple has zero net force but nonzero torque, while a force through the center can accelerate translation without center torque. Static equilibrium additionally requires both initial velocities to remain zero under the stated constraints.

Worked original case

At a=1,b=2, total load 66 N, right reaction 101/3≈33.6667 N and left 97/3≈32.3333 N. Both contacts are feasible.

Investigation

Compare point positions 2 and 4 at a=0, then add distributed load a=4. Integrate its moment, solve both reactions and retain the feasibility flag. Sketch the failed assumed contact separately from any proposed new support model.

Public numerical transfer practice

Try a new practice case

With a=0 and the point load at x=2, what is the left support reaction in newtons?

This public, unsaved check is not a secure assessment. Explain the derivative, integral or boundary in the retained course evidence workspace.

Sources and evidence boundary

Original teaching and numerical cases checked 30 October 2026 against the official AP Physics C Mechanics framework and OpenStax fixed-axis rotation. Supplied/generated evidence is not physical measurement, a load rating or laboratory participation. No rotating machinery, hanging weights or mechanical construction is requested. Public feedback and retained self-reports do not certify independent learner mastery.

Apply

Is solving the force and torque equations enough if a required upward-only support reaction is negative?

Public practice checks a specific claim. It does not establish independent mastery.

Why can zero net torque coexist with translational acceleration?

Continue

Completion requires a saved prediction, at least one capture and a reflection. Presence checks do not grade your reasoning.

Skipping retains experiments and awards no mastery.

Save a science backup or import one

Science work is stored locally in this browser, separately from mathematics and AI. It does not sync automatically. Use this science-only backup; this checkout's older all-subject export does not include science.

A legacy file is available only when the complete snapshot fits the 36 MB limit. For larger snapshots, prepare a complete file set below; never discard notebooks to make a smaller file.

Matching imported notebook drafts replace their current drafts. Omitted lessons and known first attempts remain. Export your current work first if you want to retain both drafts.

Complete file sets and course backups

A file set can hold more work than one science file. Keep its manifest and every part together. Each file is limited to 36 MB. This format needs this version of LearnAI or a compatible newer version; older versions can use only the legacy single-file backup above.

The set includes every saved science course and global continuation at this moment. Later edits need a new export. A conflicting tab exports its own visible work, which may differ from saved work in another tab.

0 file(s) selected. File order and filenames do not determine identity. Missing, changed or conflicting parts block the entire restore; no good part is applied by itself.

Science storage: loading. No account or remote computation is required.