Test support feasibility after integrating a distributed load
Require both force and torque balance, then check whether the assumed contacts can supply the reactions.
Learning outcome: Compare point positions 2 and 4 at a=0, then add distributed load a=4. Integrate its moment, solve both reactions and retain the feasibility flag. Sketch the failed assumed contact separately from any proposed new support model.
Starting recap
Declare the fixed axis, integrate the actual mass or load distribution, and test constraint feasibility before interpreting a numerical result.
All lessons are open directly. Your saved experiments remain when you leave and return.
Try
At a=1,b=2, total load 66 N, right reaction 101/3≈33.6667 N and left 97/3≈32.3333 N. Both contacts are feasible.
Open the experimentPredict
Is solving the force and torque equations enough if a required upward-only support reaction is negative?
Experiment
Compare point positions 2 and 4 at a=0, then add distributed load a=4. Integrate its moment, solve both reactions and retain the feasibility flag. Sketch the failed assumed contact separately from any proposed new support model.
Test two support reactions under distributed loading
Worked teaching model · synthetic values · Rigid beam 0–4 m, own weight 20 N centered 2; extra downward density a(1+x/4) N/m and point weight 40 N at selected x. Upward-only supports at x=1 and 3. Signed required reactions are conditional; a negative one means assumed two-contact equilibrium is infeasible.
Reset keeps your prediction, captures and practice history.
Added downward load density
Axes rescale independently. Curves join sampled coordinates; a joining segment is not additional measured evidence. Read physical units rather than screen angles or apparent slopes.
Added downward load density: numerical coordinates
| position (m) | load per length (N/m) |
|---|---|
| 0 | 1 |
| 0.1 | 1.025 |
| 0.2 | 1.05 |
| 0.3 | 1.075 |
| 0.4 | 1.1 |
| 0.5 | 1.125 |
| 0.6 | 1.15 |
| 0.7 | 1.175 |
| 0.8 | 1.2 |
| 0.9 | 1.225 |
| 1 | 1.25 |
| 1.1 | 1.275 |
| 1.2 | 1.3 |
| 1.3 | 1.325 |
| 1.4 | 1.35 |
| 1.5 | 1.375 |
| 1.6 | 1.4 |
| 1.7 | 1.425 |
| 1.8 | 1.45 |
| 1.9 | 1.475 |
| 2 | 1.5 |
| 2.1 | 1.525 |
| 2.2 | 1.55 |
| 2.3 | 1.575 |
| 2.4 | 1.6 |
| 2.5 | 1.625 |
| 2.6 | 1.65 |
| 2.7 | 1.675 |
| 2.8 | 1.7 |
| 2.9 | 1.725 |
| 3 | 1.75 |
| 3.1 | 1.775 |
| 3.2 | 1.8 |
| 3.3 | 1.825 |
| 3.4 | 1.85 |
| 3.5 | 1.875 |
| 3.6 | 1.9 |
| 3.7 | 1.925 |
| 3.8 | 1.95 |
| 3.9 | 1.975 |
| 4 | 2 |
| Quantity | Value | Unit |
|---|---|---|
| Total downward force | 66 | N |
| Required left upward reaction | 32.3333 | N |
| Required right upward reaction | 33.6667 | N |
| Torque balance about left support | 0 | N m |
| Both unilateral supports feasible | 1 | flag |
| Combined downward-force coordinate | 2.0202 | m |
Force and torque balance are necessary; the assumed contact directions must also be feasible.
Integrate added load to6a N and moment about x=0 to40a/3 N m. Support positions1 and 3 m set Rright=(moment−W)/2. A negative required upward-only reaction means the two-contact equilibrium model fails and lift-off or another constraint must be analyzed, not that a surface pulls downward.
Derive before checking. Retain contrasting captures and explain one assumption that could fail; calculated evidence is not actual laboratory work.
Force and torque balance are necessary; the assumed contact directions must also be feasible.
Integrate added load to6a N and moment about x=0 to40a/3 N m. Support positions1 and 3 m set Rright=(moment−W)/2. A negative required upward-only reaction means the two-contact equilibrium model fails and lift-off or another constraint must be analyzed, not that a surface pulls downward.
Captures preserve recipes and replay their calculated results. They are synthetic model evidence, not physical measurements.
Understand
Apply
Public practice checks a specific claim. It does not establish independent mastery.
Why can zero net torque coexist with translational acceleration?
Continue
Completion requires a saved prediction, at least one capture and a reflection. Presence checks do not grade your reasoning.
Skipping retains experiments and awards no mastery.
Save a science backup or import one
Science work is stored locally in this browser, separately from mathematics and AI. It does not sync automatically. Use this science-only backup; this checkout's older all-subject export does not include science.
A legacy file is available only when the complete snapshot fits the 36 MB limit. For larger snapshots, prepare a complete file set below; never discard notebooks to make a smaller file.
Matching imported notebook drafts replace their current drafts. Omitted lessons and known first attempts remain. Export your current work first if you want to retain both drafts.
Complete file sets and course backups
A file set can hold more work than one science file. Keep its manifest and every part together. Each file is limited to 36 MB. This format needs this version of LearnAI or a compatible newer version; older versions can use only the legacy single-file backup above.
The set includes every saved science course and global continuation at this moment. Later edits need a new export. A conflicting tab exports its own visible work, which may differ from saved work in another tab.
0 file(s) selected. File order and filenames do not determine identity. Missing, changed or conflicting parts block the entire restore; no good part is applied by itself.
Science storage: loading. No account or remote computation is required.