Derive and test a no-slip rolling constraint
Combine translation and rotation, then check whether static friction can enforce the constraint.
Learning outcome: Compare beta=.5 and 1 at 30 and 40 degrees. Draw the force diagram and derive the required friction, then test the coefficient before interpreting acceleration. For a feasible case, independently obtain the speed after a specified vertical drop from energy and from the constant-acceleration geometry.
Starting recap
State the reference axis and system, distinguish time and angle integrals, and verify an accessible and supported motion branch.
All lessons are open directly. Your saved experiments remain when you leave and return.
Try
At beta=.5 and theta=30 degrees, acceleration is 10/3 m/s², required friction is 10/3 N for M=2 kg, and mu_s,min=1/(3sqrt(3))≈.19245. Available .30 is sufficient. At beta=1 and theta=40 degrees, mu_s,min≈.41955, so the no-slip branch fails.
Open the experimentPredict
What should be done when the required static-friction coefficient exceeds the available value?
Experiment
Compare beta=.5 and 1 at 30 and 40 degrees. Draw the force diagram and derive the required friction, then test the coefficient before interpreting acceleration. For a feasible case, independently obtain the speed after a specified vertical drop from energy and from the constant-acceleration geometry.
Check whether the no-slip rolling solution is available
Worked teaching model · synthetic values · Rigid body M=2 kg,R=0.5 m,g=10,I=betaMR² on stationary incline. Required static friction compared with stipulated coefficient 0.30. Report conditional no-slip solution and explicit feasibility; do not propagate an infeasible branch as observed motion.
Reset keeps your prediction, captures and practice history.
Required static coefficient versus slope
Axes rescale independently. Curves join sampled coordinates; a joining segment is not additional measured evidence. Read physical units rather than screen angles or apparent slopes.
Required static coefficient versus slope: numerical coordinates
| slope angle (degrees) | minimum coefficient |
|---|---|
| 0 | 0 |
| 1 | 0.00581835 |
| 2 | 0.0116403 |
| 3 | 0.0174693 |
| 4 | 0.0233089 |
| 5 | 0.0291629 |
| 6 | 0.0350347 |
| 7 | 0.0409282 |
| 8 | 0.0468469 |
| 9 | 0.0527948 |
| 10 | 0.0587757 |
| 11 | 0.0647934 |
| 12 | 0.0708522 |
| 13 | 0.0769561 |
| 14 | 0.0831093 |
| 15 | 0.0893164 |
| 16 | 0.0955818 |
| 17 | 0.10191 |
| 18 | 0.108307 |
| 19 | 0.114776 |
| 20 | 0.121323 |
| 21 | 0.127955 |
| 22 | 0.134675 |
| 23 | 0.141492 |
| 24 | 0.14841 |
| 25 | 0.155436 |
| 26 | 0.162578 |
| 27 | 0.169842 |
| 28 | 0.177236 |
| 29 | 0.18477 |
| 30 | 0.19245 |
| 31 | 0.200287 |
| 32 | 0.20829 |
| 33 | 0.216469 |
| 34 | 0.224836 |
| 35 | 0.233403 |
| 36 | 0.242181 |
| 37 | 0.251185 |
| 38 | 0.260429 |
| 39 | 0.269928 |
| 40 | 0.2797 |
| Quantity | Value | Unit |
|---|---|---|
| Conditional no-slip acceleration | 3.33333 | m/s² |
| Required uphill static friction | 3.33333 | N |
| Normal force | 17.3205 | N |
| Minimum static coefficient | 0.19245 | ratio |
| Available static coefficient | 0.3 | ratio |
| No-slip branch feasible | 1 | flag |
| Rotational share of kinetic energy | 0.333333 | fraction |
A rolling constraint must be supported by enough static friction, not merely written as v=R omega.
Combine Mg sin(theta)−f=Ma and fR=I(a/R). Ideal rigid rolling on a stationary surface has zero instantaneous contact-point velocity, so static friction does not dissipate energy there. A failed friction threshold needs a slipping model; the conditional acceleration is not a prediction in that regime.
Derive before checking. Retain contrasting captures and explain one assumption that could fail; calculated evidence is not actual laboratory work.
A rolling constraint must be supported by enough static friction, not merely written as v=R omega.
Combine Mg sin(theta)−f=Ma and fR=I(a/R). Ideal rigid rolling on a stationary surface has zero instantaneous contact-point velocity, so static friction does not dissipate energy there. A failed friction threshold needs a slipping model; the conditional acceleration is not a prediction in that regime.
Captures preserve recipes and replay their calculated results. They are synthetic model evidence, not physical measurements.
Understand
Apply
Public practice checks a specific claim. It does not establish independent mastery.
Why does nonzero static friction not contradict the ideal energy-conserving rolling account?
Continue
Completion requires a saved prediction, at least one capture and a reflection. Presence checks do not grade your reasoning.
Skipping retains experiments and awards no mastery.
Save a science backup or import one
Science work is stored locally in this browser, separately from mathematics and AI. It does not sync automatically. Use this science-only backup; this checkout's older all-subject export does not include science.
A legacy file is available only when the complete snapshot fits the 36 MB limit. For larger snapshots, prepare a complete file set below; never discard notebooks to make a smaller file.
Matching imported notebook drafts replace their current drafts. Omitted lessons and known first attempts remain. Export your current work first if you want to retain both drafts.
Complete file sets and course backups
A file set can hold more work than one science file. Keep its manifest and every part together. Each file is limited to 36 MB. This format needs this version of LearnAI or a compatible newer version; older versions can use only the legacy single-file backup above.
The set includes every saved science course and global continuation at this moment. Later edits need a new export. A conflicting tab exports its own visible work, which may differ from saved work in another tab.
0 file(s) selected. File order and filenames do not determine identity. Missing, changed or conflicting parts block the entire restore; no good part is applied by itself.
Science storage: loading. No account or remote computation is required.