Learn

Learning preferences

Make learning more comfortable. Changes apply immediately.

Enlarges page content, including diagrams and their labels. You can also use your browser’s zoom.

Choose the colours that are easiest for you to distinguish. Applies to lesson diagrams and lab plots. Labels, shapes, hatching and line patterns also distinguish meanings. Source photographs and raw image brightness stay unchanged; mask-only views are available for image overlays.

ExampleComparisonSample link

Saved in this browser on this device. Preferences are separate from progress backups.

SCIENCE · INVESTIGATE AND EXPLAIN

Derive and test a no-slip rolling constraint

Combine translation and rotation, then check whether static friction can enforce the constraint.

Learning outcome: Compare beta=.5 and 1 at 30 and 40 degrees. Draw the force diagram and derive the required friction, then test the coefficient before interpreting acceleration. For a feasible case, independently obtain the speed after a specified vertical drop from energy and from the constant-acceleration geometry.

Starting recap

State the reference axis and system, distinguish time and angle integrals, and verify an accessible and supported motion branch.

All lessons are open directly. Your saved experiments remain when you leave and return.

Try

At beta=.5 and theta=30 degrees, acceleration is 10/3 m/s², required friction is 10/3 N for M=2 kg, and mu_s,min=1/(3sqrt(3))≈.19245. Available .30 is sufficient. At beta=1 and theta=40 degrees, mu_s,min≈.41955, so the no-slip branch fails.

Open the experiment

Predict

What should be done when the required static-friction coefficient exceeds the available value?

Experiment

Compare beta=.5 and 1 at 30 and 40 degrees. Draw the force diagram and derive the required friction, then test the coefficient before interpreting acceleration. For a feasible case, independently obtain the speed after a specified vertical drop from energy and from the constant-acceleration geometry.

Check whether the no-slip rolling solution is available

Worked teaching model · synthetic values · Rigid body M=2 kg,R=0.5 m,g=10,I=betaMR² on stationary incline. Required static friction compared with stipulated coefficient 0.30. Report conditional no-slip solution and explicit feasibility; do not propagate an infeasible branch as observed motion.

Reset keeps your prediction, captures and practice history.

Required static coefficient versus slope

minimum coefficientslope angle (degrees)0400.27970

Axes rescale independently. Curves join sampled coordinates; a joining segment is not additional measured evidence. Read physical units rather than screen angles or apparent slopes.

Required static coefficient versus slope: numerical coordinates
slope angle (degrees)minimum coefficient
00
10.00581835
20.0116403
30.0174693
40.0233089
50.0291629
60.0350347
70.0409282
80.0468469
90.0527948
100.0587757
110.0647934
120.0708522
130.0769561
140.0831093
150.0893164
160.0955818
170.10191
180.108307
190.114776
200.121323
210.127955
220.134675
230.141492
240.14841
250.155436
260.162578
270.169842
280.177236
290.18477
300.19245
310.200287
320.20829
330.216469
340.224836
350.233403
360.242181
370.251185
380.260429
390.269928
400.2797
Calculated values under the declared model
QuantityValueUnit
Conditional no-slip acceleration3.33333m/s²
Required uphill static friction3.33333N
Normal force17.3205N
Minimum static coefficient0.19245ratio
Available static coefficient0.3ratio
No-slip branch feasible1flag
Rotational share of kinetic energy0.333333fraction

A rolling constraint must be supported by enough static friction, not merely written as v=R omega.

Combine Mg sin(theta)−f=Ma and fR=I(a/R). Ideal rigid rolling on a stationary surface has zero instantaneous contact-point velocity, so static friction does not dissipate energy there. A failed friction threshold needs a slipping model; the conditional acceleration is not a prediction in that regime.

Derive before checking. Retain contrasting captures and explain one assumption that could fail; calculated evidence is not actual laboratory work.

A rolling constraint must be supported by enough static friction, not merely written as v=R omega.

Combine Mg sin(theta)−f=Ma and fR=I(a/R). Ideal rigid rolling on a stationary surface has zero instantaneous contact-point velocity, so static friction does not dissipate energy there. A failed friction threshold needs a slipping model; the conditional acceleration is not a prediction in that regime.

Captures preserve recipes and replay their calculated results. They are synthetic model evidence, not physical measurements.

Understand

State the geometric condition

For a rigid body rolling without slipping on a stationary surface, center travel equals R times angular displacement; vCM=R omega and aCM=R alpha with compatible signs. These relations are constraints, not universal definitions of rolling motion. The contact point is instantaneously at rest relative to the surface, although the center is moving.

Derive acceleration and required friction

The body has I=beta M R² and rolls down an incline at angle theta. Along the incline, Mg sin(theta)−f=Ma. About the center, uphill friction supplies fR=I alpha=I a/R. Thus a=g sin(theta)/(1+beta), f=beta Mg sin(theta)/(1+beta). Static friction points uphill in this particular gravity-driven case; that direction is not a rule for every rolling body with applied forces or torques.

Reject an unsupported branch

The normal force is Mg cos(theta), so no slip requires mu_s≥beta tan(theta)/(1+beta). The workbench compares this requirement with a stipulated available coefficient 0.30. If it fails, the calculated no-slip acceleration is conditional and not a prediction of actual motion. A slipping analysis must replace the invalid constraint.

Reconcile force and energy

K=MvCM²/2+Iomega²/2=MvCM²(1+beta)/2. Descending a vertical height h from rest gives v²=2gh/(1+beta) when no mechanical energy is dissipated. Ideal static friction does no work at its stationary contact point, yet transfers the required influence between center translation and rotation. This is not a claim that kinetic friction or real rolling resistance never dissipates energy. Rolling resistance is outside this model.

Worked original case

At beta=.5 and theta=30 degrees, acceleration is 10/3 m/s², required friction is 10/3 N for M=2 kg, and mu_s,min=1/(3sqrt(3))≈.19245. Available .30 is sufficient. At beta=1 and theta=40 degrees, mu_s,min≈.41955, so the no-slip branch fails.

Investigation

Compare beta=.5 and 1 at 30 and 40 degrees. Draw the force diagram and derive the required friction, then test the coefficient before interpreting acceleration. For a feasible case, independently obtain the speed after a specified vertical drop from energy and from the constant-acceleration geometry.

Public numerical transfer practice

Try a new practice case

A solid cylinder beta=.5 rolls without slipping from rest through a vertical drop .6 m with g=10 m/s². What is its final speed squared in m²/s²?

This public, unsaved check is not a secure assessment. Explain the derivative, integral or boundary in the retained course evidence workspace.

Sources and evidence boundary

Original derivations and assigned numerical cases checked 30 October 2026 against the official AP Physics C Mechanics framework and OpenStax angular momentum. These are supplied or generated records, not physical measurements or performed laboratory time. Do not construct rotating equipment, release loads or conduct launch experiments. Public feedback and retained self-reports do not certify independent mastery.

Apply

What should be done when the required static-friction coefficient exceeds the available value?

Public practice checks a specific claim. It does not establish independent mastery.

Why does nonzero static friction not contradict the ideal energy-conserving rolling account?

Continue

Completion requires a saved prediction, at least one capture and a reflection. Presence checks do not grade your reasoning.

Skipping retains experiments and awards no mastery.

Save a science backup or import one

Science work is stored locally in this browser, separately from mathematics and AI. It does not sync automatically. Use this science-only backup; this checkout's older all-subject export does not include science.

A legacy file is available only when the complete snapshot fits the 36 MB limit. For larger snapshots, prepare a complete file set below; never discard notebooks to make a smaller file.

Matching imported notebook drafts replace their current drafts. Omitted lessons and known first attempts remain. Export your current work first if you want to retain both drafts.

Complete file sets and course backups

A file set can hold more work than one science file. Keep its manifest and every part together. Each file is limited to 36 MB. This format needs this version of LearnAI or a compatible newer version; older versions can use only the legacy single-file backup above.

The set includes every saved science course and global continuation at this moment. Later edits need a new export. A conflicting tab exports its own visible work, which may differ from saved work in another tab.

0 file(s) selected. File order and filenames do not determine identity. Missing, changed or conflicting parts block the entire restore; no good part is applied by itself.

Science storage: loading. No account or remote computation is required.