Learn

Learning preferences

Make learning more comfortable. Changes apply immediately.

Enlarges page content, including diagrams and their labels. You can also use your browser’s zoom.

Choose the colours that are easiest for you to distinguish. Applies to lesson diagrams and lab plots. Labels, shapes, hatching and line patterns also distinguish meanings. Source photographs and raw image brightness stay unchanged; mask-only views are available for image overlays.

ExampleComparisonSample link

Saved in this browser on this device. Preferences are separate from progress backups.

SCIENCE · INVESTIGATE AND EXPLAIN

Integrate rotational inertia of a nonuniform rod

Weight each differential mass by squared perpendicular distance before applying a torque law.

Learning outcome: Compare beta=0,1,3. Independently integrate M,Q and Iend, derive Icm and compare normalized shape factors. Then double alpha and predict required torque without reintegrating the unchanged distribution.

Starting recap

Declare the fixed axis, integrate the actual mass or load distribution, and test constraint feasibility before interpreting a numerical result.

All lessons are open directly. Your saved experiments remain when you leave and return.

Try

For uniform beta=0, M 4 kg and length 2 m give Iend 16/3 and Icm 4/3 kg m², matching the usual ML²/3 and ML²/12 results derived from the integral.

Open the experiment

Predict

Can the inertia of a distributed rod be computed by putting all its mass at its center?

Experiment

Compare beta=0,1,3. Independently integrate M,Q and Iend, derive Icm and compare normalized shape factors. Then double alpha and predict required torque without reintegrating the unchanged distribution.

Integrate inertia for a nonuniform rod

Worked teaching model · synthetic values · Slender line 0–2 m, lambda=2(1+beta x/2) kg/m with length scale 2 m. Compare perpendicular axes through end and center. Density scale fixed, so mass changes with beta; normalized inertia separates shape from mass.

Reset keeps your prediction, captures and practice history.

End-axis inertia density

dI/dx (kg m)position (m)02160

Axes rescale independently. Curves join sampled coordinates; a joining segment is not additional measured evidence. Read physical units rather than screen angles or apparent slopes.

End-axis inertia density: numerical coordinates
position (m)dI/dx (kg m)
00
0.050.005125
0.10.021
0.150.048375
0.20.088
0.250.140625
0.30.207
0.350.287875
0.40.384
0.450.496125
0.50.625
0.550.771375
0.60.936
0.651.11963
0.71.323
0.751.54688
0.81.792
0.852.05912
0.92.349
0.952.66237
13
1.053.36262
1.13.751
1.154.16587
1.24.608
1.255.07813
1.35.577
1.356.10538
1.46.664
1.457.25363
1.57.875
1.558.52888
1.69.216
1.659.93712
1.710.693
1.7511.4844
1.812.312
1.8513.1766
1.914.079
1.9515.0199
216
Calculated values under the declared model
QuantityValueUnit
Total rod mass6kg
Center coordinate1.11111m
End-axis inertia9.33333kg m²
Central perpendicular inertia1.92593kg m²
End-axis shape factor I/(ML²)0.388889ratio
Required end-axis net torque18.6667N m

Integrate squared perpendicular distance over mass rather than averaging distances first.

Iend=integral x² dm and Icm=Iend−M xCM² for parallel axes. Increasing beta changes both density shape and total mass here; I/(ML²) separates the shape comparison. Torque=I alpha assumes a fixed axis and unchanged rigid mass distribution.

Derive before checking. Retain contrasting captures and explain one assumption that could fail; calculated evidence is not actual laboratory work.

Integrate squared perpendicular distance over mass rather than averaging distances first.

Iend=integral x² dm and Icm=Iend−M xCM² for parallel axes. Increasing beta changes both density shape and total mass here; I/(ML²) separates the shape comparison. Torque=I alpha assumes a fixed axis and unchanged rigid mass distribution.

Captures preserve recipes and replay their calculated results. They are synthetic model evidence, not physical measurements.

Understand

Define inertia about an actual axis

For a rigid body rotating about a specified fixed axis, I=integral rperp² dm. The distance is perpendicular to that axis, not necessarily distance from the center of mass. The same mass distribution can have different inertias about different axes. Units kg m² follow directly from the integral.

Predict and check a discrete distribution first

For point particles about the same specified axis, I=Σ m_i r_i². Predict whether moving mass outward changes inertia even when total mass stays fixed. Take a 1 kg particle at perpendicular distance 1 m and a 2 kg particle at 2 m: I=1(1²)+2(2²)=9 kg m². Move the 2 kg particle inward to 1 m while keeping the first particle fixed. The total mass remains 3 kg, but I becomes 3 kg m². At the same angular acceleration, the required net torque is now one third as large.

For a changed case, place all 3 kg at 2 m: predict I before checking 3(2²)=12 kg m². Equal mass does not imply equal rotational inertia. A continuous rod is the limit of such a sum over small elements: Σ r_i² Δm_i becomes integral rperp² dm, with each element’s distance measured from the same axis.

Normalize the given line distribution

The line spans 0≤x≤2 m with lambda=2(1+beta x/2) kg/m and length scale 2 m. Integrating gives M=4+2beta kg and first moment Q=4+8beta/3 kg m. The center coordinate is Q/M. The workbench holds the density scale fixed, so increasing beta changes mass as well as shape.

Integrate the end-axis inertia

About a perpendicular axis through x=0, Iend=integral x²lambda dx=16/3+4beta kg m². Squaring the average distance first would not produce the same result; distant material carries disproportionately large weight. A normalized shape factor Iend/(ML²) permits comparison without mistaking extra mass for redistribution alone.

Derive the central parallel-axis relation

Write x=(x−xCM)+xCM in the squared-distance integral. The cross term integrates to zero because integral(x−xCM)dm=0. Therefore Iend=Icm+M xCM². This proof requires parallel axes. At beta=1, M=6, xCM=10/9, Iend=28/3 and Icm=52/27 in SI units.

Apply rotational dynamics conditionally

For constant rigid I about the fixed axis, net torque equals I alpha. At beta=1 and alpha=2, required endpoint-axis torque is 56/3 N m. If mass moves radially or the axis changes, this simple constant-I equation needs re-examination; the integral is not a universal permanent label for the object.

Worked original case

For uniform beta=0, M 4 kg and length 2 m give Iend 16/3 and Icm 4/3 kg m², matching the usual ML²/3 and ML²/12 results derived from the integral.

Investigation

Compare beta=0,1,3. Independently integrate M,Q and Iend, derive Icm and compare normalized shape factors. Then double alpha and predict required torque without reintegrating the unchanged distribution.

Public numerical transfer practice

Try a new practice case

A uniform rod of mass 3 kg and length 2 m rotates about a perpendicular end axis. What is its inertia in kg m²?

This public, unsaved check is not a secure assessment. Explain the derivative, integral or boundary in the retained course evidence workspace.

Sources and evidence boundary

Original teaching and numerical cases checked 30 October 2026 against the official AP Physics C Mechanics framework and OpenStax fixed-axis rotation. Supplied/generated evidence is not physical measurement, a load rating or laboratory participation. No rotating machinery, hanging weights or mechanical construction is requested. Public feedback and retained self-reports do not certify independent learner mastery.

Apply

Can the inertia of a distributed rod be computed by putting all its mass at its center?

Public practice checks a specific claim. It does not establish independent mastery.

Why must a claim about moving mass outward state whether total mass was held fixed?

Continue

Completion requires a saved prediction, at least one capture and a reflection. Presence checks do not grade your reasoning.

Skipping retains experiments and awards no mastery.

Save a science backup or import one

Science work is stored locally in this browser, separately from mathematics and AI. It does not sync automatically. Use this science-only backup; this checkout's older all-subject export does not include science.

A legacy file is available only when the complete snapshot fits the 36 MB limit. For larger snapshots, prepare a complete file set below; never discard notebooks to make a smaller file.

Matching imported notebook drafts replace their current drafts. Omitted lessons and known first attempts remain. Export your current work first if you want to retain both drafts.

Complete file sets and course backups

A file set can hold more work than one science file. Keep its manifest and every part together. Each file is limited to 36 MB. This format needs this version of LearnAI or a compatible newer version; older versions can use only the legacy single-file backup above.

The set includes every saved science course and global continuation at this moment. Later edits need a new export. A conflicting tab exports its own visible work, which may differ from saved work in another tab.

0 file(s) selected. File order and filenames do not determine identity. Missing, changed or conflicting parts block the entire restore; no good part is applied by itself.

Science storage: loading. No account or remote computation is required.