Couple translation and rotation through a massive pulley
Recover unequal tensions from the rotational equation instead of assuming an ideal massless pulley.
Learning outcome: At m 2=4 compare I=.5,1,2. Solve acceleration, both tensions and torque independently; retain the no-slip conversion and compare the massless limit. Explain which observations would challenge the assumed constraint.
Starting recap
Declare the fixed axis, integrate the actual mass or load distribution, and test constraint feasibility before interpreting a numerical result.
All lessons are open directly. Your saved experiments remain when you leave and return.
Try
m 2=4,I=1 yields a 2,alpha 4,T 1=24,T 2=32 and net pulley torque 4 in SI units. Doubling I increases effective rotational resistance to acceleration.
Open the experimentPredict
Must the tensions on both sides of an accelerating inertial pulley be equal?
Experiment
At m 2=4 compare I=.5,1,2. Solve acceleration, both tensions and torque independently; retain the no-slip conversion and compare the massless limit. Explain which observations would challenge the assumed constraint.
Couple translational forces to pulley inertia
Worked teaching model · synthetic values · Virtual masses 2 kg and selected heavier mass joined by ideal massless nonstretching rope on fixed radius 0.5 m pulley. g=10 m/s², no slip or axle friction. Pulley inertia prevents equal tensions. No physical hanging loads are requested.
Reset keeps your prediction, captures and practice history.
Acceleration versus pulley inertia
Axes rescale independently. Curves join sampled coordinates; a joining segment is not additional measured evidence. Read physical units rather than screen angles or apparent slopes.
Acceleration versus pulley inertia: numerical coordinates
| inertia (kg m²) | acceleration (m/s²) |
|---|---|
| 0 | 3.33333 |
| 0.05 | 3.22581 |
| 0.1 | 3.125 |
| 0.15 | 3.0303 |
| 0.2 | 2.94118 |
| 0.25 | 2.85714 |
| 0.3 | 2.77778 |
| 0.35 | 2.7027 |
| 0.4 | 2.63158 |
| 0.45 | 2.5641 |
| 0.5 | 2.5 |
| 0.55 | 2.43902 |
| 0.6 | 2.38095 |
| 0.65 | 2.32558 |
| 0.7 | 2.27273 |
| 0.75 | 2.22222 |
| 0.8 | 2.17391 |
| 0.85 | 2.12766 |
| 0.9 | 2.08333 |
| 0.95 | 2.04082 |
| 1 | 2 |
| 1.05 | 1.96078 |
| 1.1 | 1.92308 |
| 1.15 | 1.88679 |
| 1.2 | 1.85185 |
| 1.25 | 1.81818 |
| 1.3 | 1.78571 |
| 1.35 | 1.75439 |
| 1.4 | 1.72414 |
| 1.45 | 1.69492 |
| 1.5 | 1.66667 |
| 1.55 | 1.63934 |
| 1.6 | 1.6129 |
| 1.65 | 1.5873 |
| 1.7 | 1.5625 |
| 1.75 | 1.53846 |
| 1.8 | 1.51515 |
| 1.85 | 1.49254 |
| 1.9 | 1.47059 |
| 1.95 | 1.44928 |
| 2 | 1.42857 |
| Quantity | Value | Unit |
|---|---|---|
| Linear acceleration magnitude | 2 | m/s² |
| Pulley angular acceleration | 4 | rad/s² |
| Rising-side tension | 24 | N |
| Descending-side tension | 32 | N |
| Net pulley torque | 4 | N m |
| Rotational I alpha | 4 | N m |
| Displacement after 1 s from rest | 1 | m |
An inertial pulley needs unequal tensions to produce the torque for its angular acceleration.
For the rising mass T1−m1g=m1a; for the descending mass m2g−T2=m2a; and (T2−T1)R=I(a/R). Eliminating tensions gives the denominator m1+m2+I/R². The zero-inertia plotted comparison is an ideal limit, not a claim every pulley is massless.
Derive before checking. Retain contrasting captures and explain one assumption that could fail; calculated evidence is not actual laboratory work.
An inertial pulley needs unequal tensions to produce the torque for its angular acceleration.
For the rising mass T1−m1g=m1a; for the descending mass m2g−T2=m2a; and (T2−T1)R=I(a/R). Eliminating tensions gives the denominator m1+m2+I/R². The zero-inertia plotted comparison is an ideal limit, not a claim every pulley is massless.
Captures preserve recipes and replay their calculated results. They are synthetic model evidence, not physical measurements.
Understand
Apply
Public practice checks a specific claim. It does not establish independent mastery.
Why does the pulley inertia enter the translational denominator as I/R²?
Continue
Completion requires a saved prediction, at least one capture and a reflection. Presence checks do not grade your reasoning.
Skipping retains experiments and awards no mastery.
Save a science backup or import one
Science work is stored locally in this browser, separately from mathematics and AI. It does not sync automatically. Use this science-only backup; this checkout's older all-subject export does not include science.
A legacy file is available only when the complete snapshot fits the 36 MB limit. For larger snapshots, prepare a complete file set below; never discard notebooks to make a smaller file.
Matching imported notebook drafts replace their current drafts. Omitted lessons and known first attempts remain. Export your current work first if you want to retain both drafts.
Complete file sets and course backups
A file set can hold more work than one science file. Keep its manifest and every part together. Each file is limited to 36 MB. This format needs this version of LearnAI or a compatible newer version; older versions can use only the legacy single-file backup above.
The set includes every saved science course and global continuation at this moment. Later edits need a new export. A conflicting tab exports its own visible work, which may differ from saved work in another tab.
0 file(s) selected. File order and filenames do not determine identity. Missing, changed or conflicting parts block the entire restore; no good part is applied by itself.
Science storage: loading. No account or remote computation is required.