Audit an impulse window before accepting endpoint agreement
Separate missing force tails, baseline accumulation and an independent momentum comparison.
Learning outcome: Compare h=.5,1,1.5 at B=.5, then set B=0. Retain all error terms separately and propose a baseline observation outside the pulse. Explain how opposite errors could produce misleading agreement.
Starting recap
Integrate net external force, preserve vector and system boundaries, and test collision and evidence assumptions independently.
All lessons are open directly. Your saved experiments remain when you leave and return.
Try
h=.5,B=.5 gives true captured 11, missing 5, baseline+.5 and indicated 11.5 N s. Enlarging to h=1 removes missing tails but leaves indicated 17 rather than 16.
Open the experimentPredict
Does a wider force-integration window always reduce total impulse error?
Experiment
Compare h=.5,1,1.5 at B=.5, then set B=0. Retain all error terms separately and propose a baseline observation outside the pulse. Explain how opposite errors could produce misleading agreement.
Challenge a force-window inference with baseline error
Worked teaching model · synthetic values · Teacher net pulse F=12t(2−t) N over0–2 s, zero outside; full impulse16 N s. Integrate indicated force over[1−h,1+h]. Compare missing tails and coherent baseline error; time bounds are stipulated exact, not calibrated measurements.
Reset keeps your prediction, captures and practice history.
Indicated force in selected window
Axes rescale independently. Curves join sampled coordinates; a joining segment is not additional measured evidence. Read physical units rather than screen angles or apparent slopes.
Indicated force in selected window: numerical coordinates
| time (s) | force (N) |
|---|---|
| 0.5 | 9.5 |
| 0.525 | 9.7925 |
| 0.55 | 10.07 |
| 0.575 | 10.3325 |
| 0.6 | 10.58 |
| 0.625 | 10.8125 |
| 0.65 | 11.03 |
| 0.675 | 11.2325 |
| 0.7 | 11.42 |
| 0.725 | 11.5925 |
| 0.75 | 11.75 |
| 0.775 | 11.8925 |
| 0.8 | 12.02 |
| 0.825 | 12.1325 |
| 0.85 | 12.23 |
| 0.875 | 12.3125 |
| 0.9 | 12.38 |
| 0.925 | 12.4325 |
| 0.95 | 12.47 |
| 0.975 | 12.4925 |
| 1 | 12.5 |
| 1.025 | 12.4925 |
| 1.05 | 12.47 |
| 1.075 | 12.4325 |
| 1.1 | 12.38 |
| 1.125 | 12.3125 |
| 1.15 | 12.23 |
| 1.175 | 12.1325 |
| 1.2 | 12.02 |
| 1.225 | 11.8925 |
| 1.25 | 11.75 |
| 1.275 | 11.5925 |
| 1.3 | 11.42 |
| 1.325 | 11.2325 |
| 1.35 | 11.03 |
| 1.375 | 10.8125 |
| 1.4 | 10.58 |
| 1.425 | 10.3325 |
| 1.45 | 10.07 |
| 1.475 | 9.7925 |
| 1.5 | 9.5 |
| Quantity | Value | Unit |
|---|---|---|
| Captured true impulse | 11 | N s |
| Missing pulse-tail impulse | 5 | N s |
| Indicated baseline contribution | 0.5 | N s |
| Integrated indicated impulse | 11.5 | N s |
| Indicated minus full impulse | -4.5 | N s |
| Independent assigned momentum change | 16 | kg m/s |
A wider integration window can capture omitted tails while accumulating more baseline bias.
Integrate the real pulse only over its0–2 s support, then add the offset across the entire observation window. Missing-tail and baseline terms can accidentally cancel, so agreement with delta-p is not proof of an unbiased force sensor. Time calibration and all external forces remain separate evidence.
Derive before checking. Retain contrasting captures and explain one assumption that could fail; calculated evidence is not actual laboratory work.
A wider integration window can capture omitted tails while accumulating more baseline bias.
Integrate the real pulse only over its0–2 s support, then add the offset across the entire observation window. Missing-tail and baseline terms can accidentally cancel, so agreement with delta-p is not proof of an unbiased force sensor. Time calibration and all external forces remain separate evidence.
Captures preserve recipes and replay their calculated results. They are synthetic model evidence, not physical measurements.
Understand
Apply
Public practice checks a specific claim. It does not establish independent mastery.
What independent evidence would distinguish missing tails from a coherent offset?
Continue
Completion requires a saved prediction, at least one capture and a reflection. Presence checks do not grade your reasoning.
Skipping retains experiments and awards no mastery.
Save a science backup or import one
Science work is stored locally in this browser, separately from mathematics and AI. It does not sync automatically. Use this science-only backup; this checkout's older all-subject export does not include science.
A legacy file is available only when the complete snapshot fits the 36 MB limit. For larger snapshots, prepare a complete file set below; never discard notebooks to make a smaller file.
Matching imported notebook drafts replace their current drafts. Omitted lessons and known first attempts remain. Export your current work first if you want to retain both drafts.
Complete file sets and course backups
A file set can hold more work than one science file. Keep its manifest and every part together. Each file is limited to 36 MB. This format needs this version of LearnAI or a compatible newer version; older versions can use only the legacy single-file backup above.
The set includes every saved science course and global continuation at this moment. Later edits need a new export. A conflicting tab exports its own visible work, which may differ from saved work in another tab.
0 file(s) selected. File order and filenames do not determine identity. Missing, changed or conflicting parts block the entire restore; no good part is applied by itself.
Science storage: loading. No account or remote computation is required.