Learn

Learning preferences

Make learning more comfortable. Changes apply immediately.

Enlarges page content, including diagrams and their labels. You can also use your browser’s zoom.

Choose the colours that are easiest for you to distinguish. Applies to lesson diagrams and lab plots. Labels, shapes, hatching and line patterns also distinguish meanings. Source photographs and raw image brightness stay unchanged; mask-only views are available for image overlays.

ExampleComparisonSample link

Saved in this browser on this device. Preferences are separate from progress backups.

SCIENCE · INVESTIGATE AND EXPLAIN

Use the chain rule to audit an oscillator clock

Distinguish a phase shift from a rescaled time axis in a synthetic motion record.

Learning outcome: Compare phase indices0 and1 at gain1, then hold phase fixed while changing gain. Derive first and second derivatives in both time coordinates. Retain a same-physical-instant comparison and propose an independent clock or force/mass check that could distinguish the alternatives.

Starting recap

Derive the restoring equation, retain initial conditions and distinguish exact harmonic results from approximation and calibration assumptions.

All lessons are open directly. Your saved experiments remain when you leave and return.

Try

With phi=0 and g=1.2, indicated omega=5/3 rad/reported s and indicated period=1.2pi. First derivatives are scaled by5/6 and second derivatives by25/36. Neither scaling changes the assigned true amplitude .4 m.

Open the experiment

Predict

Can an exact sinusoidal record alone calibrate its own time unit?

Experiment

Compare phase indices0 and1 at gain1, then hold phase fixed while changing gain. Derive first and second derivatives in both time coordinates. Retain a same-physical-instant comparison and propose an independent clock or force/mass check that could distinguish the alternatives.

Audit phase derivatives against a timestamp gain

Worked teaching model · synthetic values · True synthetic x=.4 cos(2t+phi) m; displayed clock u=gain*t. Gain is a known intervention, not inferred from waveform alone. Compare true and reported-time derivatives at true t=.5 s; no noise.

Reset keeps your prediction, captures and practice history.

Position against reported clock

displacement (m)reported time (s)03.141590.399452-0.399452

Axes rescale independently. Curves join sampled coordinates; a joining segment is not additional measured evidence. Read physical units rather than screen angles or apparent slopes.

Position against reported clock: numerical coordinates
reported time (s)displacement (m)
00.282843
0.05235990.251728
0.104720.217856
0.157080.181596
0.209440.143347
0.2617990.103528
0.3141590.0625738
0.3665190.0209344
0.418879-0.0209344
0.471239-0.0625738
0.523599-0.103528
0.575959-0.143347
0.628319-0.181596
0.680678-0.217856
0.733038-0.251728
0.785398-0.282843
0.837758-0.310858
0.890118-0.335468
0.942478-0.356403
0.994838-0.373432
1.0472-0.38637
1.09956-0.395075
1.15192-0.399452
1.20428-0.399452
1.25664-0.395075
1.309-0.38637
1.36136-0.373432
1.41372-0.356403
1.46608-0.335468
1.51844-0.310858
1.5708-0.282843
1.62316-0.251728
1.67552-0.217856
1.72788-0.181596
1.78024-0.143347
1.8326-0.103528
1.88496-0.0625738
1.93732-0.0209344
1.989680.0209344
2.042040.0625738
2.09440.103528
2.146750.143347
2.199110.181596
2.251470.217856
2.303830.251728
2.356190.282843
2.408550.310858
2.460910.335468
2.513270.356403
2.565630.373432
2.617990.38637
2.670350.395075
2.722710.399452
2.775070.399452
2.827430.395075
2.879790.38637
2.932150.373432
2.984510.356403
3.036870.335468
3.089230.310858
3.141590.282843
Calculated values under the declared model
QuantityValueUnit
Phase0.785398rad
Physical displacement at selected instant-0.0851834m
True velocity at selected instant-0.781649m/s
Reported-time first derivative-0.781649m/reported s
True acceleration at selected instant0.340733m/s²
Reported-time second derivative0.340733m/reported s²
Indicated angular frequency2rad/reported s
Indicated period3.14159reported s

A clock gain rescales inferred derivative rates even when every position lies on a smooth periodic curve.

Chain rule gives dx/du=(dx/dt)/gain and d²x/du²=(d²x/dt²)/gain². A waveform alone determines frequency in its reported time unit, not an independently calibrated physical clock. Known k/m or an independent timing standard is needed to distinguish a clock error from a genuinely changed oscillator.

Derive before checking. Retain contrasting captures and explain one assumption that could fail; calculated evidence is not actual laboratory work.

A clock gain rescales inferred derivative rates even when every position lies on a smooth periodic curve.

Chain rule gives dx/du=(dx/dt)/gain and d²x/du²=(d²x/dt²)/gain². A waveform alone determines frequency in its reported time unit, not an independently calibrated physical clock. Known k/m or an independent timing standard is needed to distinguish a clock error from a genuinely changed oscillator.

Captures preserve recipes and replay their calculated results. They are synthetic model evidence, not physical measurements.

Understand

Differentiate a phase-aware displacement

The true assigned motion is x=.4 cos(2t+phi) m. Its velocity is −.8 sin(2t+phi) m/s and acceleration −1.6 cos(2t+phi) m/s². Position and acceleration have opposite signs; velocity is a quarter-cycle out of phase. A different phi shifts the time of a given state without changing amplitude or true frequency.

Introduce a declared clock intervention

The reported time is u=g t, where g is a dimensionless positive gain. The same positions become x(u)=.4 cos(2u/g+phi). By the chain rule dx/du=(dx/dt)/g and d²x/du²=(d²x/dt²)/g². The indicated angular frequency is 2/g in radians per reported second and indicated period is g pi reported seconds.

Identify what the record can establish

A perfectly smooth sinusoid identifies frequency in its recorded time coordinate. Without an independent timing reference or independently known k/m, it cannot decide whether an altered period came from clock gain or a different physical oscillator. More repeated points from the same clock do not independently calibrate it. The workbench deliberately supplies the gain as an intervention; it does not pretend to infer it from the curve.

Compare representations at one physical instant

The ledger compares all quantities at true t=.5 s; the reported time for that instant is .5g. Comparing two curves at the same numerical reported time would instead compare different physical instants when gains differ. State which comparison you mean before claiming an amplitude, phase or derivative error.

Distinguish free oscillation from resonance

The natural frequency is the frequency of the undriven system after a displacement. A sinusoidal external force near that natural frequency can repeatedly transfer energy with a favorable phase and increase the oscillation amplitude: resonance. The undriven workbench has no forcing term and must not be used as a driven-response calculator. Real damping and nonlinear response limit amplitudes; a response peak alone does not validate the time axis.

In a separate original supplied comparison, the free-oscillation period is pi seconds. Equal small forcing amplitudes at angular frequencies 1,2,4 rad/s give recorded displacement amplitudes .04,.18,.03 m after the same declared observation protocol. Predict which drive is closest to the natural angular frequency before checking 2 rad/s. The pattern is consistent with resonant enhancement, not proof that all other parameters or instrument gains were held fixed. Propose a repeat with independently checked force amplitude and timing. The three supplied observations are not generated by the undriven model and do not establish an exact resonance curve.

For a changed ideal mass-spring system whose stiffness is quadrupled at fixed mass, natural angular frequency doubles. Predict how the drive should change to remain near resonance; merely increasing the forcing amplitude would not restore a frequency match.

Worked original case

With phi=0 and g=1.2, indicated omega=5/3 rad/reported s and indicated period=1.2pi. First derivatives are scaled by5/6 and second derivatives by25/36. Neither scaling changes the assigned true amplitude .4 m.

Investigation

Compare phase indices0 and1 at gain1, then hold phase fixed while changing gain. Derive first and second derivatives in both time coordinates. Retain a same-physical-instant comparison and propose an independent clock or force/mass check that could distinguish the alternatives.

Public numerical transfer practice

Try a new practice case

If reported time is twice true time, by what factor is dx/du reduced relative to dx/dt at the same physical instant?

This public, unsaved check is not a secure assessment. Explain the derivative, integral or boundary in the retained course evidence workspace.

Sources and evidence boundary

Original derivations and assigned numerical cases checked 30 October 2026 against the official AP Physics C Mechanics framework and OpenStax harmonic motion and pendulums. These are supplied or generated records, not physical measurements or performed laboratory time. Do not construct rotating equipment, release loads or conduct launch experiments. Public feedback and retained self-reports do not certify independent mastery.

Apply

Can an exact sinusoidal record alone calibrate its own time unit?

Public practice checks a specific claim. It does not establish independent mastery.

Why is a quarter-cycle phase shift not equivalent to a multiplicative clock gain?

Continue

Completion requires a saved prediction, at least one capture and a reflection. Presence checks do not grade your reasoning.

Skipping retains experiments and awards no mastery.

Save a science backup or import one

Science work is stored locally in this browser, separately from mathematics and AI. It does not sync automatically. Use this science-only backup; this checkout's older all-subject export does not include science.

A legacy file is available only when the complete snapshot fits the 36 MB limit. For larger snapshots, prepare a complete file set below; never discard notebooks to make a smaller file.

Matching imported notebook drafts replace their current drafts. Omitted lessons and known first attempts remain. Export your current work first if you want to retain both drafts.

Complete file sets and course backups

A file set can hold more work than one science file. Keep its manifest and every part together. Each file is limited to 36 MB. This format needs this version of LearnAI or a compatible newer version; older versions can use only the legacy single-file backup above.

The set includes every saved science course and global continuation at this moment. Later edits need a new export. A conflicting tab exports its own visible work, which may differ from saved work in another tab.

0 file(s) selected. File order and filenames do not determine identity. Missing, changed or conflicting parts block the entire restore; no good part is applied by itself.

Science storage: loading. No account or remote computation is required.