Learn

Learning preferences

Make learning more comfortable. Changes apply immediately.

Enlarges page content, including diagrams and their labels. You can also use your browser’s zoom.

Choose the colours that are easiest for you to distinguish. Applies to lesson diagrams and lab plots. Labels, shapes, hatching and line patterns also distinguish meanings. Source photographs and raw image brightness stay unchanged; mask-only views are available for image overlays.

ExampleComparisonSample link

Saved in this browser on this device. Preferences are separate from progress backups.

SCIENCE · INVESTIGATE AND EXPLAIN

Build a fixed-number partition sum with exclusion

Consider two identical spin-polarized noninteracting fermions and four nondegenerate one-particle states of energies 0,delta,2delta,3delta. Spin polarization means each listed state has capacity one. At fixed N=2, allowed configurations are unordered pairs of distinct indices: (0,1),(0,2),(0,3),(1,2),(1,3),(2,3). There are six, not sixteen.

Learning outcome: List all six configurations and normalize their weights for two temperature ratios. Reconstruct each level occupancy and total energy, then repeat with sixteen distinguishable configurations. Explain why a one-level occupancy greater than one would reject the spin-polarized fermion description.

Starting recap

Review finite sums, exponential and logarithmic functions, radial integration measures, first-order coupled equations and mass-energy units. Keep state counts, occupations, calibration records and unused tests distinct.

All lessons are open directly. Your saved experiments remain when you leave and return.

Try

In a changed analytic packet set q=exp[−delta/(kBT)]=1/2. Pair weights sum to q+q²+2q³+q^4+q^5=35/32. Fermion ground-level occupancy is (q+q²+q³)/Z=4/5. The distinguishable comparison gives 2/(1+q+q²+q³)=16/15, illustrating the exclusion difference.

Open the experiment

Predict

What is fixed in both of these canonical comparisons?

Experiment

List all six configurations and normalize their weights for two temperature ratios. Reconstruct each level occupancy and total energy, then repeat with sixteen distinguishable configurations. Explain why a one-level occupancy greater than one would reject the spin-polarized fermion description.

Keep fixed particle number while changing counting rules

Worked teaching model · synthetic values · Two identical spin-polarized noninteracting fermions occupy four nondegenerate one-particle states with energies 0, delta, 2delta, 3delta, canonical equilibrium at fixed N=2. Compare two distinguishable noninteracting classical particles in the same finite states, where repeated occupancy is allowed. This is not a grand-canonical approximation or a real-material equation of state.

Reset keeps your prediction, captures and practice history.

Same levels and temperature, different allowed configurations

mean occupancyone-particle energy (eV)031.2878290

Graph axes rescale independently; read units and values, not screen angles. 1: canonical spin-polarized fermions (solid).2: two distinguishable classical particles (dashed). Joined curves show the supplied model, not additional observations.

Equivalent numerical coordinates for Same levels and temperature, different allowed configurations

canonical spin-polarized fermions

one-particle energy (eV)mean occupancy
00.8807971
10.6944133
20.3055867
30.1192029

At most 82 representative computed coordinates including endpoints; the plotted curve can use a finer grid. A table of a revealed generator is not independent measurement evidence.

two distinguishable classical particles

one-particle energy (eV)mean occupancy
01.287829
10.4737656
20.1742886
30.06411721

At most 82 representative computed coordinates including endpoints; the plotted curve can use a finer grid. A table of a revealed generator is not independent measurement evidence.

Calculated quantities under the declared measurement model
QuantityValueUnit
Canonical fermion configurations6integer
Distinguishable classical ordered configurations16integer
Fermion mean total energy1.663195eV
Classical mean total energy1.014695eV
Fermion ground-state occupancy0.8807971particles
Classical ground-state mean occupancy1.287829particles
Fermion total mean particle count2particles

Exclusion changes the allowed configurations before the thermal weights are normalized.

Enumerate six unordered distinct-level pairs i<j with Boltzmann weight exp[−(Ei+Ej)/kBT]. Normalize the pair partition function, then sum pair probabilities containing each level. For the distinguishable comparison there are 16 ordered pairs, including repetition, and mean occupancy2exp(−Ei/kBT)/z1. Both have exactly two particles; a chemical-potential Fermi function is not substituted for this small fixed-N canonical enumeration.

Predict before inspecting the values. Save contrasting records with assumptions and one alternative explanation. This virtual display does not certify practical measurement technique.

Exclusion changes the allowed configurations before the thermal weights are normalized.

Enumerate six unordered distinct-level pairs i<j with Boltzmann weight exp[−(Ei+Ej)/kBT]. Normalize the pair partition function, then sum pair probabilities containing each level. For the distinguishable comparison there are 16 ordered pairs, including repetition, and mean occupancy2exp(−Ei/kBT)/z1. Both have exactly two particles; a chemical-potential Fermi function is not substituted for this small fixed-N canonical enumeration.

Captures preserve recipes and replay their calculated results. They are synthetic model evidence, not physical measurements.

Understand

Define the state and evidence

Consider two identical spin-polarized noninteracting fermions and four nondegenerate one-particle states of energies 0,delta,2delta,3delta. Spin polarization means each listed state has capacity one. At fixed N=2, allowed configurations are unordered pairs of distinct indices: (0,1),(0,2),(0,3),(1,2),(1,3),(2,3). There are six, not sixteen.

Derive the quantitative relation

In canonical equilibrium, a pair has weight exp[−(Ei+Ej)/(kBT)]. Sum these six weights to obtain Z, divide each by Z for its probability, and sum probabilities of pairs containing level i for its mean occupancy. Each occupancy lies between zero and one and their sum is exactly two. Mean energy is the sum of energy times occupancy.

Test a changed model or boundary

For a comparison with two distinguishable classical particles in the same four states, all sixteen ordered pairs are allowed, including both particles at one level. The one-particle sum is z1=sum exp(−Ei/kBT); mean occupancy is 2exp(−Ei/kBT)/z1. This can exceed one, without changing total particle number. The change is in allowed configurations, not a new energy spectrum.

Limit the inference

A grand-canonical Fermi function with an adjustable chemical potential is not substituted for this small fixed-number enumeration. At low temperature the fermions occupy the two lowest states, whereas the distinguishable comparison tends toward two particles in the lowest state. These are bounded statistical models, not proof of real-material equilibrium or an experimental spin preparation.

Worked original case

In a changed analytic packet set q=exp[−delta/(kBT)]=1/2. Pair weights sum to q+q²+2q³+q^4+q^5=35/32. Fermion ground-level occupancy is (q+q²+q³)/Z=4/5. The distinguishable comparison gives 2/(1+q+q²+q³)=16/15, illustrating the exclusion difference.

Investigation

List all six configurations and normalize their weights for two temperature ratios. Reconstruct each level occupancy and total energy, then repeat with sixteen distinguishable configurations. Explain why a one-level occupancy greater than one would reject the spin-polarized fermion description.

Changed-case practice

Try the changed case before feedback

For q=1/2, find the fermion ground-level occupancy.

This practice is public and unsaved. A matching number does not verify understanding. Retain your explanation, assumptions and changed-case evidence in the separate course workspace.

Sources and boundaries

Original derivations and virtual evidence checked 31 October 2026 against the primary explanation. All questions and numerical packets are original. Supplied theoretical distributions and synthetic records are not actual laboratory measurements. No nuclear, electrical, heating, beam or material-handling procedures are requested. Retain first reasoning, actual criterion critique, revision and a separately assigned unfamiliar task in the course evidence workspace; public keys do not authenticate mastery.

Apply

What is fixed in both of these canonical comparisons?

Public practice checks a specific claim. It does not establish independent mastery.

Which independent calibration, state-counting or physical-domain premise is needed, and which fresh observation could challenge the inference?

Continue

Completion requires a saved prediction, at least one capture and a reflection. Presence checks do not grade your reasoning.

Skipping retains experiments and awards no mastery.

Save a science backup or import one

Science work is stored locally in this browser, separately from mathematics and AI. It does not sync automatically. Use this science-only backup; this checkout's older all-subject export does not include science.

A legacy file is available only when the complete snapshot fits the 36 MB limit. For larger snapshots, prepare a complete file set below; never discard notebooks to make a smaller file.

Matching imported notebook drafts replace their current drafts. Omitted lessons and known first attempts remain. Export your current work first if you want to retain both drafts.

Complete file sets and course backups

A file set can hold more work than one science file. Keep its manifest and every part together. Each file is limited to 36 MB. This format needs this version of LearnAI or a compatible newer version; older versions can use only the legacy single-file backup above.

The set includes every saved science course and global continuation at this moment. Later edits need a new export. A conflicting tab exports its own visible work, which may differ from saved work in another tab.

0 file(s) selected. File order and filenames do not determine identity. Missing, changed or conflicting parts block the entire restore; no good part is applied by itself.

Science storage: loading. No account or remote computation is required.