Learn

Learning preferences

Make learning more comfortable. Changes apply immediately.

Enlarges page content, including diagrams and their labels. You can also use your browser’s zoom.

Choose the colours that are easiest for you to distinguish. Applies to lesson diagrams and lab plots. Labels, shapes, hatching and line patterns also distinguish meanings. Source photographs and raw image brightness stay unchanged; mask-only views are available for image overlays.

ExampleComparisonSample link

Saved in this browser on this device. Preferences are separate from progress backups.

SCIENCE · INVESTIGATE AND EXPLAIN

Separate diffraction scale degeneracy from an unused prediction

The original paraxial diffraction packet gives positions 6.4,12.4,18.4 mm at orders 1,2,3. Its forward law is x=c+m g λ/100, with wavelength λ in nm, gain g dimensionless and the conversion factor fixed by the stated geometry. Fitting a line estimates the product gλ, not wavelength and gain separately.

Learning outcome: Fit only the three assigned orders, derive the prediction weights and propagate bounds without assuming independent random errors. Freeze the unused prediction before comparing the fourth record and distinguish a failed model check from a unique diagnosis of its cause.

Starting recap

Retain complex amplitude before intensity, definite-integral boundaries, normalization, calibration covariance and unused evidence.

All lessons are open directly. Your saved experiments remain when you leave and return.

Try

At g=1 and e=0.04 mm, wavelength is 600 nm with hard bounds about 590.099 to 610.101 nm. The unused prediction is 24.4±0.093333 mm, while the unused record is 24.6±0.04 mm. The intervals are disjoint because 0.2 exceeds 0.133333.

Open the experiment

Predict

Can a better gain anchor fix a disagreement in a held-out position predicted directly in the original coordinate system?

Experiment

Fit only the three assigned orders, derive the prediction weights and propagate bounds without assuming independent random errors. Freeze the unused prediction before comparing the fourth record and distinguish a failed model check from a unique diagnosis of its cause.

Separate wavelength from scale and unused evidence

Worked teaching model · synthetic values · Original first-three-order positions 6.4,12.4,18.4 mm fit x=c+m g λ/100 with λ in nm, g dimensionless; this stipulated paraxial geometry converts λ/100 to mm. Independent gain has hard bound ±0.01. Unused fourth-order record 24.6 mm has the same reading bound; never include it in the fit. Bounds are not confidence intervals.

Reset keeps your prediction, captures and practice history.

The fit identifies gain times wavelength; an independent anchor resolves the scale, while the unused record checks a different prediction.

Original first-three-order positions 6.4,12.4,18.4 mm fit x=c+m g λ/100 with λ in nm, g dimensionless; this stipulated paraxial geometry converts λ/100 to mm. Independent gain has hard bound ±0.01. Unused fourth-order record 24.6 mm has the same reading bound; never include it in the fit. Bounds are not confidence intervals.

1424.40000diffraction orderpredicted position (mm)

The vertical axis is rescaled to this case’s actual range; equal display height does not imply equal optical power. The finite curve is illustrative; the ledger preserves the exact case values and stated numerical quadrature.

Original conditional optical ledger
QuantityValueUnit
Fitted order slope6mm/order
Fitted zero offset0.400000mm
Inferred wavelength with anchor600nm
Wavelength hard lower bound590.099nm
Wavelength hard upper bound610.101nm
Unused fourth-order prediction24.4000mm
Prediction hard error bound0.0933333mm
Unused record center24.6000mm
Center discrepancy0.200000mm
Prediction plus unused-reading bound0.133333mm
  • Compatibility of unused record: Intervals are disjoint under the declared hard bounds; revisit the geometry/calibration model or uncertainty.

Virtual original records only. No laser, intense-light source, instrument alignment, physical apparatus operation or completed practical competence is supplied.

The fit identifies gain times wavelength; an independent anchor resolves the scale, while the unused record checks a different prediction.

Original first-three-order positions 6.4,12.4,18.4 mm fit x=c+m g λ/100 with λ in nm, g dimensionless; this stipulated paraxial geometry converts λ/100 to mm. Independent gain has hard bound ±0.01. Unused fourth-order record 24.6 mm has the same reading bound; never include it in the fit. Bounds are not confidence intervals.

Captures preserve recipes and replay their calculated results. They are synthetic model evidence, not physical measurements.

Understand

1. Establish the optical mechanism

The original paraxial diffraction packet gives positions 6.4,12.4,18.4 mm at orders 1,2,3. Its forward law is x=c+m g λ/100, with wavelength λ in nm, gain g dimensionless and the conversion factor fixed by the stated geometry. Fitting a line estimates the product gλ, not wavelength and gain separately.

For equally weighted orders 1,2,3, slope is (x3−x1)/2=6 mm/order and intercept is mean(x)−2slope=0.4 mm. An independent gain anchor g with hard interval g±0.01 gives λ=600/g. With each fitted position bounded by ±e, the slope error is at most e; opposite endpoint signs attain that bound.

The wavelength interval is [100(6−e)/(g+0.01),100(6+e)/(g−0.01)]. A common gain uncertainty cannot be reduced simply by averaging more orders under that same calibration. These are deterministic hard bounds, not standard errors or confidence intervals.

Keep the fourth-order record 24.6±e mm unused until the fit is frozen. Its predicted center is 24.4 mm. The linear prediction has reading weights −2/3,1/3,4/3, so the hard prediction error is (7/3)e. Comparing intervals permits a center discrepancy up to (10/3)e. The gain anchor changes inferred wavelength but cancels from this same-coordinate predicted position; independent calibration and unused validation constrain different aspects of the model.

2. Work the original evidence

At g=1 and e=0.04 mm, wavelength is 600 nm with hard bounds about 590.099 to 610.101 nm. The unused prediction is 24.4±0.093333 mm, while the unused record is 24.6±0.04 mm. The intervals are disjoint because 0.2 exceeds 0.133333.

3. Predict and investigate

Can a better gain anchor fix a disagreement in a held-out position predicted directly in the original coordinate system?

Fit only the three assigned orders, derive the prediction weights and propagate bounds without assuming independent random errors. Freeze the unused prediction before comparing the fourth record and distinguish a failed model check from a unique diagnosis of its cause.

Transfer the derivation to a changed case

Keep g=1 but use e=0.06 mm. Compare the held-out intervals and explain what acceptance would establish.

Retain your prediction, intermediate reasoning and assumptions before opening public feedback.

Compare a worked response

Prediction is 24.4±0.14 mm and unused reading 24.6±0.06 mm; the intervals touch at 24.54 mm. The declared bounds no longer reject this fit, but compatibility does not prove a unique optical model or an actual calibrated apparatus.

Primary mechanism context. Checked 31 October 2026. Original prose, records and diagrams; no copied source exercises or physical light-source operation. Retain first reasoning and public-feedback exposure in the course evidence workspace when registered.

Apply

What does the original three-order slope identify before the independent gain anchor?

Public practice checks a specific claim. It does not establish independent mastery.

Keep g=1 but use e=0.06 mm. Compare the held-out intervals and explain what acceptance would establish.

Continue

Completion requires a saved prediction, at least one capture and a reflection. Presence checks do not grade your reasoning.

Skipping retains experiments and awards no mastery.

Save a science backup or import one

Science work is stored locally in this browser, separately from mathematics and AI. It does not sync automatically. Use this science-only backup; this checkout's older all-subject export does not include science.

A legacy file is available only when the complete snapshot fits the 36 MB limit. For larger snapshots, prepare a complete file set below; never discard notebooks to make a smaller file.

Matching imported notebook drafts replace their current drafts. Omitted lessons and known first attempts remain. Export your current work first if you want to retain both drafts.

Complete file sets and course backups

A file set can hold more work than one science file. Keep its manifest and every part together. Each file is limited to 36 MB. This format needs this version of LearnAI or a compatible newer version; older versions can use only the legacy single-file backup above.

The set includes every saved science course and global continuation at this moment. Later edits need a new export. A conflicting tab exports its own visible work, which may differ from saved work in another tab.

0 file(s) selected. File order and filenames do not determine identity. Missing, changed or conflicting parts block the entire restore; no good part is applied by itself.

Science storage: loading. No account or remote computation is required.