Use polarization to distinguish transverse structure from intensity
An electromagnetic plane wave has electric and magnetic fields perpendicular to each other and to its propagation direction. Its polarization specifies the electric-field oscillation orientation. A longitudinal sound disturbance in an ordinary fluid has no comparable independent transverse direction, so the same polarizer argument does not apply to it. This wave polarization is different from separating positive and negative charges in an electrostatic material.
Learning outcome: Compare 0°, 45° and 90° with the same initial intensity, then change only intensity. Retain both stage outputs and explain the changed polarization direction between stages. Separately order visible red/violet by frequency without assigning different vacuum speeds.
Starting recap
Distinguish spatial and temporal axes, signed disturbances, material boundaries and exact versus approximate wave geometry. Identify supplied numerical enrichment before applying it.
All lessons are open directly. Your saved experiments remain when you leave and return.
Try
With initially polarized intensity 8 W/m² and θ=45°, the first analyzer transmits 4 W/m². A final horizontal analyzer transmits half of that, 2 W/m². Without the intermediate analyzer, ideal crossed vertical/horizontal orientations transmit zero. Both stages still reduce their own incident intensity.
Open the experimentPredict
Does nonzero transmission after adding a middle analyzer mean that analyzer created light energy?
Experiment
Compare 0°, 45° and 90° with the same initial intensity, then change only intensity. Retain both stage outputs and explain the changed polarization direction between stages. Separately order visible red/violet by frequency without assigning different vacuum speeds.
Distinguish a polarization filter from energy creation
Worked teaching model · synthetic values · Initially vertical linear polarization. Compare its transmission through one analyzer at θ with transmission through that analyzer followed by a horizontal final analyzer. Supplied Malus projection formula is optional quantitative enrichment. Ideal absorptive filters; no solar viewing or clinical claim.
Reset keeps your prediction, captures and practice history.
Original ideal analyzer comparison
- 1: after intermediate — solid line
- 2: after intermediate and crossed final — long dashes
Accessible coordinates for this panel
These tables sample up to 82 displayed coordinates per series, including both endpoints. Fine curves may contain additional calculated points between table entries; use the ledger for exact analytic minima, frequencies or other named evidence. Values are synthetic, not instrument readings.
| intermediate angle (degrees) | intensity (W/m²) |
|---|---|
| 0 | 8 |
| 2 | 7.9903 |
| 4 | 7.9611 |
| 6 | 7.9126 |
| 8 | 7.845 |
| 10 | 7.7588 |
| 12 | 7.6542 |
| 14 | 7.5318 |
| 16 | 7.3922 |
| 18 | 7.2361 |
| 20 | 7.0642 |
| 22 | 6.8774 |
| 24 | 6.6765 |
| 26 | 6.4626 |
| 28 | 6.2368 |
| 30 | 6 |
| 32 | 5.7535 |
| 34 | 5.4984 |
| 36 | 5.2361 |
| 38 | 4.9677 |
| 40 | 4.6946 |
| 42 | 4.4181 |
| 44 | 4.1396 |
| 46 | 3.8604 |
| 48 | 3.5819 |
| 50 | 3.3054 |
| 52 | 3.0323 |
| 54 | 2.7639 |
| 56 | 2.5016 |
| 58 | 2.2465 |
| 60 | 2 |
| 62 | 1.7632 |
| 64 | 1.5374 |
| 66 | 1.3235 |
| 68 | 1.1226 |
| 70 | 0.93582 |
| 72 | 0.76393 |
| 74 | 0.60781 |
| 76 | 0.46821 |
| 78 | 0.34582 |
| 80 | 0.24123 |
| 82 | 0.15495 |
| 84 | 0.08741 |
| 86 | 0.038928 |
| 88 | 0.0097438 |
| 90 | 2.9995e-32 |
| intermediate angle (degrees) | intensity (W/m²) |
|---|---|
| 0 | 0 |
| 2 | 0.0097319 |
| 4 | 0.038738 |
| 6 | 0.086455 |
| 8 | 0.15195 |
| 10 | 0.23396 |
| 12 | 0.33087 |
| 14 | 0.44081 |
| 16 | 0.56163 |
| 18 | 0.69098 |
| 20 | 0.82635 |
| 22 | 0.9651 |
| 24 | 1.1045 |
| 26 | 1.2419 |
| 28 | 1.3746 |
| 30 | 1.5 |
| 32 | 1.6157 |
| 34 | 1.7193 |
| 36 | 1.809 |
| 38 | 1.8829 |
| 40 | 1.9397 |
| 42 | 1.9781 |
| 44 | 1.9976 |
| 46 | 1.9976 |
| 48 | 1.9781 |
| 50 | 1.9397 |
| 52 | 1.8829 |
| 54 | 1.809 |
| 56 | 1.7193 |
| 58 | 1.6157 |
| 60 | 1.5 |
| 62 | 1.3746 |
| 64 | 1.2419 |
| 66 | 1.1045 |
| 68 | 0.9651 |
| 70 | 0.82635 |
| 72 | 0.69098 |
| 74 | 0.56163 |
| 76 | 0.44081 |
| 78 | 0.33087 |
| 80 | 0.23396 |
| 82 | 0.15195 |
| 84 | 0.086455 |
| 86 | 0.038738 |
| 88 | 0.0097319 |
| 90 | 2.9995e-32 |
Each plot rescales independently. Compare values and units rather than apparent screen angles. Different panels can represent different quantities and are not silently overlaid.
| Quantity | Value | Unit |
|---|---|---|
| Incident polarized intensity | 8 | W/m² |
| After intermediate analyzer | 4 | W/m² |
| After added horizontal final analyzer | 2 | W/m² |
| Final intensity without intermediate analyzer | 0 | W/m² |
Adding a middle orientation changes which field component reaches the crossed final filter; no stage creates energy.
Initially linearly polarized light differs from an unpolarized beam. The cosine-squared numerical law is optional enrichment; transverse orientation and intensity reduction are core. The first filter also changes the transmitted polarization direction. Longitudinal sound does not have this transverse orientation freedom. All electromagnetic spectral bands share vacuum speed, not wavelength.
Adding a middle orientation changes which field component reaches the crossed final filter; no stage creates energy.
Initially linearly polarized light differs from an unpolarized beam. The cosine-squared numerical law is optional enrichment; transverse orientation and intensity reduction are core. The first filter also changes the transmitted polarization direction. Longitudinal sound does not have this transverse orientation freedom. All electromagnetic spectral bands share vacuum speed, not wavelength.
Captures preserve recipes and replay their calculated results. They are synthetic model evidence, not physical measurements.
Understand
Apply
Public practice checks a specific claim. It does not establish independent mastery.
What assumption would fail if the initial beam were unpolarized rather than the declared vertical input?
Continue
Completion requires a saved prediction, at least one capture and a reflection. Presence checks do not grade your reasoning.
Skipping retains experiments and awards no mastery.
Save a science backup or import one
Science work is stored locally in this browser, separately from mathematics and AI. It does not sync automatically. Use this science-only backup; this checkout's older all-subject export does not include science.
A legacy file is available only when the complete snapshot fits the 36 MB limit. For larger snapshots, prepare a complete file set below; never discard notebooks to make a smaller file.
Matching imported notebook drafts replace their current drafts. Omitted lessons and known first attempts remain. Export your current work first if you want to retain both drafts.
Complete file sets and course backups
A file set can hold more work than one science file. Keep its manifest and every part together. Each file is limited to 36 MB. This format needs this version of LearnAI or a compatible newer version; older versions can use only the legacy single-file backup above.
The set includes every saved science course and global continuation at this moment. Later edits need a new export. A conflicting tab exports its own visible work, which may differ from saved work in another tab.
0 file(s) selected. File order and filenames do not determine identity. Missing, changed or conflicting parts block the entire restore; no good part is applied by itself.
Science storage: loading. No account or remote computation is required.