Learn

Learning preferences

Make learning more comfortable. Changes apply immediately.

Enlarges page content, including diagrams and their labels. You can also use your browser’s zoom.

Choose the colours that are easiest for you to distinguish. Applies to lesson diagrams and lab plots. Labels, shapes, hatching and line patterns also distinguish meanings. Source photographs and raw image brightness stay unchanged; mask-only views are available for image overlays.

ExampleComparisonSample link

Saved in this browser on this device. Preferences are separate from progress backups.

SCIENCE · INVESTIGATE AND EXPLAIN

Separate digestive processing, absorption and animal production

Ingestion brings food into a feeding system; digestion breaks material into usable components; absorption crosses an interface into the organism; assimilation and later allocation determine what supports metabolism or new tissue. Egested undigested material is not identical to nitrogenous metabolic waste. A large meal is not automatically a large growth increment.

Learning outcome: Compare assimilation 0.4 and 0.8 at maintenance 60. Retain the complete input/output ledger, label the deficit case and explain which digestive and metabolic measurements would distinguish the alternatives without handling an animal.

Starting recap

Connect comparative animal structures and regulatory mechanisms to complete exchange, resource and signaling ledgers, preserving causal and practical limits.

All lessons are open directly. Your saved experiments remain when you leave and return.

Try

At assimilation fraction 0.6, 60 energy units are assimilated and 40 egested. Maintenance of 40 leaves 20 for possible production or storage. At assimilation 0.4 and maintenance 60, balance is −20: the model requires 20 units from reserves or an unmet-demand explanation.

Open the experiment

Predict

Would the same ingestion imply the same production if digestibility or maintenance changed?

Experiment

Compare assimilation 0.4 and 0.8 at maintenance 60. Retain the complete input/output ledger, label the deficit case and explain which digestive and metabolic measurements would distinguish the alternatives without handling an animal.

Reconstruct ingestion, assimilation and production

Worked teaching model · synthetic values · Ingested energy 100 units, assimilated 100a, egested 100(1−a). Maintenance b is met from assimilation; negative balance indicates reserve use or unmet demand, not negative new tissue. No actual animal feeding protocol.

Reset keeps your prediction, captures and practice history.

Ingestion, absorption and new production are not interchangeable quantities.

A negative balance requires reserves or reduced performance; it is not negative offspring. Digestive architecture and microbial processing affect access to nutrients but are not estimated from this budget alone.

Calculated quantities under stated assumptions
QuantityValueUnit
Ingested energy100energy units
Egested energy40energy units
Assimilated energy60energy units
Maintenance expenditure40energy units
Signed post-maintenance balance20energy units
Potential positive production20energy units
Reserve draw or unmet demand0energy units

Retain prior predictions, settings and quantities in the notebook. These are original supplied/calculated comparisons, not physical specimen observations or laboratory participation.

Ingestion, absorption and new production are not interchangeable quantities.

A negative balance requires reserves or reduced performance; it is not negative offspring. Digestive architecture and microbial processing affect access to nutrients but are not estimated from this budget alone.

Captures preserve recipes and replay their calculated results. They are synthetic model evidence, not physical measurements.

Understand

1. Orient: Separate digestive processing, absorption and animal production

Ingestion brings food into a feeding system; digestion breaks material into usable components; absorption crosses an interface into the organism; assimilation and later allocation determine what supports metabolism or new tissue. Egested undigested material is not identical to nitrogenous metabolic waste. A large meal is not automatically a large growth increment.

2. Connect comparative structure and mechanism

A cnidarian gastrovascular cavity combines extracellular processing with distribution through a cavity, whereas a complete digestive tract has separate entry and exit and can support regional specialization. In vertebrate examples, mechanical processing, enzymatic hydrolysis, bile-assisted lipid processing and intestinal absorption are complementary functions. Bile emulsification is not itself enzymatic cleavage. Microbial partners can make otherwise inaccessible substrates usable, but their contribution must be demonstrated for the actual host and diet.

The supplied energy packet contains 100 ingested units. Fraction a is assimilated, leaving 100(1−a) egested units. Subtract maintenance b from assimilated energy to obtain the signed post-maintenance balance. Positive balance is only a potential allocation pool; growth, reproduction, activity and storage can compete for it.

If the balance is negative, reserves could be drawn down or demand could remain unmet. Reporting negative new tissue production would hide that biological distinction. The packet does not estimate actual nutritional adequacy, tissue composition or animal welfare and does not prescribe a feeding experiment.

3. Reconstruct the worked evidence

At assimilation fraction 0.6, 60 energy units are assimilated and 40 egested. Maintenance of 40 leaves 20 for possible production or storage. At assimilation 0.4 and maintenance 60, balance is −20: the model requires 20 units from reserves or an unmet-demand explanation.

4. Predict and investigate

Predict first: Would the same ingestion imply the same production if digestibility or maintenance changed?

Compare assimilation 0.4 and 0.8 at maintenance 60. Retain the complete input/output ledger, label the deficit case and explain which digestive and metabolic measurements would distinguish the alternatives without handling an animal.

Retain the first prediction, complete ledger, stated controls and a conflicting or null comparison. These original supplied calculations are not measured animals or completed practical work.

5. Apply a changed case

Apply the mechanism to a changed case

At assimilation fraction 0.7 and maintenance 50, calculate egested energy, assimilated energy and post-maintenance balance.

Retain your calculation, units and assumptions in the lesson notebook before opening this public practice response.

Compare a worked response

Egested 30, assimilated 70 and positive balance 20 energy units. The 20 units are not automatically all offspring or body growth; allocation and additional losses remain unspecified.

6. Defend a bounded biological conclusion

Connect the mechanism to the evidence, identify an omitted alternative and propose an independent discriminating observation using provided or archived information only. Preserve first reasoning and human critique in the General Biology II workspace. Public practice does not establish independently assessed practical skill. No animal handling, physiological challenge, medical interpretation or intervention is requested.

Supporting scientific reference, checked 30 October 2026. Original prose, models and numerical packets; no source exercise or image reproduced. Real comparative specimen or physiological work requires separately supervised ethical practice and validation.

Apply

When the supplied post-maintenance balance is −20, the supported interpretation is:

Public practice checks a specific claim. It does not establish independent mastery.

At assimilation fraction 0.7 and maintenance 50, calculate egested energy, assimilated energy and post-maintenance balance.

Continue

Completion requires a saved prediction, at least one capture and a reflection. Presence checks do not grade your reasoning.

Skipping retains experiments and awards no mastery.

Save a science backup or import one

Science work is stored locally in this browser, separately from mathematics and AI. It does not sync automatically. Use this science-only backup; this checkout's older all-subject export does not include science.

A legacy file is available only when the complete snapshot fits the 36 MB limit. For larger snapshots, prepare a complete file set below; never discard notebooks to make a smaller file.

Matching imported notebook drafts replace their current drafts. Omitted lessons and known first attempts remain. Export your current work first if you want to retain both drafts.

Complete file sets and course backups

A file set can hold more work than one science file. Keep its manifest and every part together. Each file is limited to 36 MB. This format needs this version of LearnAI or a compatible newer version; older versions can use only the legacy single-file backup above.

The set includes every saved science course and global continuation at this moment. Later edits need a new export. A conflicting tab exports its own visible work, which may differ from saved work in another tab.

0 file(s) selected. File order and filenames do not determine identity. Missing, changed or conflicting parts block the entire restore; no good part is applied by itself.

Science storage: loading. No account or remote computation is required.