Learn

Learning preferences

Make learning more comfortable. Changes apply immediately.

Enlarges page content, including diagrams and their labels. You can also use your browser’s zoom.

Choose the colours that are easiest for you to distinguish. Applies to lesson diagrams and lab plots. Labels, shapes, hatching and line patterns also distinguish meanings. Source photographs and raw image brightness stay unchanged; mask-only views are available for image overlays.

ExampleComparisonSample link

Saved in this browser on this device. Preferences are separate from progress backups.

SCIENCE · INVESTIGATE AND EXPLAIN

Separate LC components with independent amplitude evidence

In an ideal LC circuit, T = 2pi sqrt(LC).

Learning outcome: Construct an equal-period alternative, retain two independent relations and solve both parameters. Add a gain-confounded counterexample, then specify one genuinely independent observation that would resolve it. Separate synthetic record agreement from performed measurement and independent validation.

Starting recap

Differentiate linked flux, preserve circuit state and test energy and independent-calibration constraints.

All lessons are open directly. Your saved experiments remain when you leave and return.

Try

L = 2 H and C = 3 F with V0 = 2 V give T = 2pi sqrt(6) ≈ 15.390598 s and Ipeak = 2sqrt(3/2) ≈ 2.449490 A. Substitution recovers L = 2 H and C = 3 F. A current gain of two would instead produce apparent L = 1 H and C = 6 F while preserving their product.

Open the experiment

Predict

An unknown multiplicative current gain changes which inference?

Experiment

Construct an equal-period alternative, retain two independent relations and solve both parameters. Add a gain-confounded counterexample, then specify one genuinely independent observation that would resolve it. Separate synthetic record agreement from performed measurement and independent validation.

Identify two components from independent records

Worked teaching model · synthetic values · Ideal LC circuit starts at capacitor voltage 2 V and zero current. Period and independently calibrated peak-current magnitude are supplied. These are synthetic records, not actual measurements. Unknown sensor gain is a separate counterexample.

Reset keeps your prediction, captures and practice history.

State and topology reference

This original schematic defines one closed loop; it is not an apparatus wiring instruction. Exact element connections and event conditions are stated below. Component sizes are schematic.

Cqi = dq/dtL
  • The capacitor and inductor form one isolated loop; there is no source or resistor.
  • The q label marks the selected left capacitor plate. The arrow is toward that plate, so i = dq/dt.
  • L d²q/dt² + q/C = 0. Reversing the chosen plate reverses q and i together, not the nonnegative energy.

Equal-period capacitance alternatives

candidate capacitance (F)candidate inductance (H)1460

Axes rescale independently. Curves join sampled coordinates; a joining segment is not additional measured evidence. Read physical units rather than screen angles or apparent slopes.

Equal-period capacitance alternatives: numerical coordinates
candidate inductance (H)candidate capacitance (F)
16
1.055.71429
1.15.45455
1.155.21739
1.25
1.254.8
1.34.61538
1.354.44444
1.44.28571
1.454.13793
1.54
1.553.87097
1.63.75
1.653.63636
1.73.52941
1.753.42857
1.83.33333
1.853.24324
1.93.15789
1.953.07692
23
2.052.92683
2.12.85714
2.152.7907
2.22.72727
2.252.66667
2.32.6087
2.352.55319
2.42.5
2.452.44898
2.52.4
2.552.35294
2.62.30769
2.652.26415
2.72.22222
2.752.18182
2.82.14286
2.852.10526
2.92.06897
2.952.0339
32
3.051.96721
3.11.93548
3.151.90476
3.21.875
3.251.84615
3.31.81818
3.351.79104
3.41.76471
3.451.73913
3.51.71429
3.551.69014
3.61.66667
3.651.64384
3.71.62162
3.751.6
3.81.57895
3.851.55844
3.91.53846
3.951.51899
41.5
Calculated values under the declared model
QuantityValueUnit
Period record15.3906s
Peak-current record2.44949A
Known initial voltage2V
Recovered inductance2H
Recovered capacitance3F
Product constrained by period alone6H F

Period fixes a product; an independently calibrated amplitude fixes a ratio and separates the two components.

Period gives LC and energy gives Ipeak/V0 = sqrt(C/L). Combine to get L = T V0/(2pi Ipeak) and C = T Ipeak/(2pi V0). If current gain is unknown, these two inferred components trade off with that gain, so numerical agreement is not independent identification.

Derive before checking. Retain contrasting captures and explain one assumption that could fail; calculated evidence is not actual laboratory work.

Period fixes a product; an independently calibrated amplitude fixes a ratio and separates the two components.

Period gives LC and energy gives Ipeak/V0 = sqrt(C/L). Combine to get L = T V0/(2pi Ipeak) and C = T Ipeak/(2pi V0). If current gain is unknown, these two inferred components trade off with that gain, so numerical agreement is not independent identification.

Captures preserve recipes and replay their calculated results. They are synthetic model evidence, not physical measurements.

Understand

A fitted period does not identify everything

In an ideal LC circuit, T = 2pi sqrt(LC). A measured period determines the product LC, not each factor. The pairs L = 2 H, C = 3 F and L = 3 H, C = 2 F produce the same period. A good period fit is therefore compatible with distinct components; more digits in the same record do not resolve that structural ambiguity.

Use an independently calibrated second relation

Suppose the circuit begins with known capacitor voltage V0 and zero current. Conservation gives peak current Ipeak = V0 sqrt(C/L). This supplies a ratio while the period supplies a product. Solving gives L = T V0/(2pi Ipeak) and C = T Ipeak/(2pi V0). The voltage, current calibration, initial condition and negligible-loss model must all be independent assumptions or evidence, not quantities inferred from the same desired answer.

Expose sensor-gain confounding

If a current sensor reports g times true current and g is unknown, using that report as Ipeak gives inferred L divided by g and inferred C multiplied by g. Their product still agrees perfectly with the period. A period residual cannot reveal this gain error. An independent current calibration or an independently known component can break the ambiguity; another identical uncalibrated trace may not.

Design a virtual evidence comparison

Choose two component pairs with the same product and predict equal periods but different peak currents from the same initial voltage. Retain the predictions before revealing the model record. Then introduce a supplied current-gain error and explain which reconstructed quantity changes and which remains fixed. A real apparatus plan would require qualified supervision and instrument constraints; this workspace records a conceptual design and supplied-data analysis only.

Worked original case

L = 2 H and C = 3 F with V0 = 2 V give T = 2pi sqrt(6) ≈ 15.390598 s and Ipeak = 2sqrt(3/2) ≈ 2.449490 A. Substitution recovers L = 2 H and C = 3 F. A current gain of two would instead produce apparent L = 1 H and C = 6 F while preserving their product.

Investigation

Construct an equal-period alternative, retain two independent relations and solve both parameters. Add a gain-confounded counterexample, then specify one genuinely independent observation that would resolve it. Separate synthetic record agreement from performed measurement and independent validation.

Changed-case practice

Try a new practice case

With V0 = 2 V, T = 4pi s and Ipeak = 1 A, what inductance in henries is inferred?

This public, unsaved check is not a secure assessment. Explain the source integral, symmetry or charge boundary in the retained course evidence workspace.

Sources and boundaries

Original teaching checked 31 October 2026 against current official Unit 13 and the relevant OpenStax discussion. No source exercises or diagrams are reproduced. All records and apparatus are virtual, supplied or generated; no real wiring, switching, magnetic braking or electrical measurement is requested. Public feedback and retained work do not establish independent mastery, supervised practical participation or AP authorization.

Apply

An unknown multiplicative current gain changes which inference?

Public practice checks a specific claim. It does not establish independent mastery.

Which orientation, initial state, symmetry or independent calibration assumption would change this induction inference?

Continue

Completion requires a saved prediction, at least one capture and a reflection. Presence checks do not grade your reasoning.

Skipping retains experiments and awards no mastery.

Save a science backup or import one

Science work is stored locally in this browser, separately from mathematics and AI. It does not sync automatically. Use this science-only backup; this checkout's older all-subject export does not include science.

A legacy file is available only when the complete snapshot fits the 36 MB limit. For larger snapshots, prepare a complete file set below; never discard notebooks to make a smaller file.

Matching imported notebook drafts replace their current drafts. Omitted lessons and known first attempts remain. Export your current work first if you want to retain both drafts.

Complete file sets and course backups

A file set can hold more work than one science file. Keep its manifest and every part together. Each file is limited to 36 MB. This format needs this version of LearnAI or a compatible newer version; older versions can use only the legacy single-file backup above.

The set includes every saved science course and global continuation at this moment. Later edits need a new export. A conflicting tab exports its own visible work, which may differ from saved work in another tab.

0 file(s) selected. File order and filenames do not determine identity. Missing, changed or conflicting parts block the entire restore; no good part is applied by itself.

Science storage: loading. No account or remote computation is required.