Learn

Learning preferences

Make learning more comfortable. Changes apply immediately.

Enlarges page content, including diagrams and their labels. You can also use your browser’s zoom.

Choose the colours that are easiest for you to distinguish. Applies to lesson diagrams and lab plots. Labels, shapes, hatching and line patterns also distinguish meanings. Source photographs and raw image brightness stay unchanged; mask-only views are available for image overlays.

ExampleComparisonSample link

Saved in this browser on this device. Preferences are separate from progress backups.

SCIENCE · INVESTIGATE AND EXPLAIN

Resolve interface orientation before combining dielectric regions

This supplied piecewise-continuum extension follows the fully filled dielectric core case.

Learning outcome: Predict both geometries for f = 0, 0.5 and 1 before checking. Draw the interface and indicate whether voltage or normal D is shared. Integrate the two layer energies and compare with the final-state capacitor expression.

Starting recap

Declare conductor boundaries, integrate potential or charging work, and distinguish controlled charge from voltage.

All lessons are open directly. Your saved experiments remain when you leave and return.

Try

For A = 0.01 m², d = 2 mm, V = 4 V, kappa = 3 and f = 0.5, C0 ≈ 44.2709 pF and layered C ≈ 66.4064 pF. Vacuum and dielectric fields are 3000 and 1000 N/C, with voltage drops 3 and 1 V. The side-by-side comparison instead gives 88.5419 pF.

Open the experiment

Predict

For layers stacked across the gap with no free interface charge, which normal quantity is continuous?

Experiment

Predict both geometries for f = 0, 0.5 and 1 before checking. Draw the interface and indicate whether voltage or normal D is shared. Integrate the two layer energies and compare with the final-state capacitor expression.

Resolve a layered dielectric interface

Worked teaching model · synthetic values · Plate area 0.01 m², gap 0.002 m, maintained 4 V. Dielectric slab normal to the field, remainder vacuum; no free interface charge or fringe effects. Piecewise ideal-linear continuum extension; comparison side-by-side area fill has a different interface orientation.

Reset keeps your prediction, captures and practice history.

Layer orientation determines the voltage sum

+−Vacuum fraction: 0.5Dielectric fraction: 0.5D →

The field crosses the layers in sequence. The horizontal fraction is scaled; plate height is schematic and does not encode area. With no free interface charge, normal D is shared, while E and the potential slope change. Zero-width regions are absent, not hidden slabs.

Piecewise potential drop from first plate

accumulated drop (V)distance (mm)0240

Axes rescale independently. Curves join sampled coordinates; a joining segment is not additional measured evidence. Read physical units rather than screen angles or apparent slopes.

Piecewise potential drop from first plate: numerical coordinates
distance (mm)accumulated drop (V)
00
0.03333330.1
0.06666670.2
0.10.3
0.1333330.4
0.1666670.5
0.20.6
0.2333330.7
0.2666670.8
0.30.9
0.3333331
0.3666671.1
0.41.2
0.4333331.3
0.4666671.4
0.51.5
0.5333331.6
0.5666671.7
0.61.8
0.6333331.9
0.6666672
0.72.1
0.7333332.2
0.7666672.3
0.82.4
0.8333332.5
0.8666672.6
0.92.7
0.9333332.8
0.9666672.9
13
1.033333.03333
1.066673.06667
1.13.1
1.133333.13333
1.166673.16667
1.23.2
1.233333.23333
1.266673.26667
1.33.3
1.333333.33333
1.366673.36667
1.43.4
1.433333.43333
1.466673.46667
1.53.5
1.533333.53333
1.566673.56667
1.63.6
1.633333.63333
1.666673.66667
1.73.7
1.733333.73333
1.766673.76667
1.83.8
1.833333.83333
1.866673.86667
1.93.9
1.933333.93333
1.966673.96667
24
Calculated values under the declared model
QuantityValueUnit
Series-layer capacitance66.4064pF
Side-by-side comparison capacitance88.5419pF
Free displacement magnitude26.5626nC/m²
Vacuum-layer field3000N/C
Dielectric-layer field1000N/C
Vacuum voltage drop3V
Dielectric voltage drop1V
Integrated layer energy0.531251nJ
Final-state energy0.531251nJ

Normal displacement continuity and the sum of layer voltage drops produce a harmonic, not arithmetic, permittivity combination.

With no free charge at the internal interface, normal D is equal in both layers. E is D/epsilon in each material. At zero layer thickness the displayed field for that absent material is a hypothetical limiting value, not a field in an existing region. Side-by-side area fill shares voltage instead and gives the arithmetic area-weighted capacitance.

Derive before checking. Retain contrasting captures and explain one assumption that could fail; calculated evidence is not actual laboratory work.

Normal displacement continuity and the sum of layer voltage drops produce a harmonic, not arithmetic, permittivity combination.

With no free charge at the internal interface, normal D is equal in both layers. E is D/epsilon in each material. At zero layer thickness the displayed field for that absent material is a hypothetical limiting value, not a field in an existing region. Side-by-side area fill shares voltage instead and gives the arithmetic area-weighted capacitance.

Captures preserve recipes and replay their calculated results. They are synthetic model evidence, not physical measurements.

Understand

State the extension and the interface

This supplied piecewise-continuum extension follows the fully filled dielectric core case. A slab occupies fraction f of the gap thickness, with vacuum filling the remainder. Interfaces are parallel to the plates, so the field crosses layers in sequence. There is no free charge at the internal interface; normal electric displacement D is the same in both regions.

Add voltage drops, not permittivities

With D = Q/A, the vacuum field is D/epsilon0 and dielectric field D/(kappa epsilon0). The total voltage is Dd[(1 − f) + f/kappa]/epsilon0. Thus C = C0/[(1 − f) + f/kappa], where C0 = epsilon0 A/d. The potential slope changes at the interface, while the potential itself is continuous.

Contrast a different geometry

If instead a dielectric fills fraction f of plate area across the entire gap, the regions share voltage and their charges add. Neglecting fringe effects, C = C0[(1 − f) + kappa f]. These arithmetic and harmonic combinations answer different boundary problems. At f = 0 or 1 they agree; between those limits they generally do not.

Check energy and absent regions

Integrate epsilon E²/2 over each region and add; the result is CV²/2. At f = 0 the dielectric region is absent, so its displayed field is only a hypothetical material-side limit. At f = 1 the same caveat applies to vacuum. Do not claim a measured field exists inside a zero-volume layer.

Worked original case

For A = 0.01 m², d = 2 mm, V = 4 V, kappa = 3 and f = 0.5, C0 ≈ 44.2709 pF and layered C ≈ 66.4064 pF. Vacuum and dielectric fields are 3000 and 1000 N/C, with voltage drops 3 and 1 V. The side-by-side comparison instead gives 88.5419 pF.

Investigation

Predict both geometries for f = 0, 0.5 and 1 before checking. Draw the interface and indicate whether voltage or normal D is shared. Integrate the two layer energies and compare with the final-state capacitor expression.

Changed-case practice

Try a new practice case

For kappa = 4 and f = 0.5 in the thickness-layer geometry, what is C/C0?

This public, unsaved check is not a secure assessment. Explain the source integral, symmetry or charge boundary in the retained course evidence workspace.

Sources and boundaries

Original cases checked against the official framework on 30 October 2026, with OpenStax verification on 31 October 2026 against the current official framework, Unit 10 and OpenStax capacitance. These are virtual supplied models, not instructions to charge, ground, wire or handle real equipment. Public answers are practice; retained plans and self-reports do not establish independent mastery, actual laboratory participation or AP authorization.

Apply

For layers stacked across the gap with no free interface charge, which normal quantity is continuous?

Public practice checks a specific claim. It does not establish independent mastery.

Which conductor boundary, geometric approximation or independent observation could change this conclusion?

Continue

Completion requires a saved prediction, at least one capture and a reflection. Presence checks do not grade your reasoning.

Skipping retains experiments and awards no mastery.

Save a science backup or import one

Science work is stored locally in this browser, separately from mathematics and AI. It does not sync automatically. Use this science-only backup; this checkout's older all-subject export does not include science.

A legacy file is available only when the complete snapshot fits the 36 MB limit. For larger snapshots, prepare a complete file set below; never discard notebooks to make a smaller file.

Matching imported notebook drafts replace their current drafts. Omitted lessons and known first attempts remain. Export your current work first if you want to retain both drafts.

Complete file sets and course backups

A file set can hold more work than one science file. Keep its manifest and every part together. Each file is limited to 36 MB. This format needs this version of LearnAI or a compatible newer version; older versions can use only the legacy single-file backup above.

The set includes every saved science course and global continuation at this moment. Later edits need a new export. A conflicting tab exports its own visible work, which may differ from saved work in another tab.

0 file(s) selected. File order and filenames do not determine identity. Missing, changed or conflicting parts block the entire restore; no good part is applied by itself.

Science storage: loading. No account or remote computation is required.