Derive a finite-line field and compare distinct limits
Use pairwise cancellation while retaining the full source distance.
Learning outcome: Compare half-lengths.5,1,2 m at fixed Q and distance 1 m. Derive the exact vertical field, then separately compare each with the infinite-line expression at that case’s actual density. Sketch paired horizontal contributions and retain their cancellation before integration.
Starting recap
Choose source and observer coordinates, integrate normalized charge, and justify symmetry before simplifying field or flux.
All lessons are open directly. Your saved experiments remain when you leave and return.
Try
For a uniform line from−1 to 1 m with Q = 2 nC and observation at(0,1), lambda = 1 nC/m and Ey = kQ/sqrt 2≈12.7103 N/C. The same-density infinite-line expression gives 17.9751 N/C; the finite line has fewer contributing charges.
Open the experimentPredict
Which quantity is held fixed when taking the infinite uniform line limit?
Experiment
Compare half-lengths.5,1,2 m at fixed Q and distance 1 m. Derive the exact vertical field, then separately compare each with the infinite-line expression at that case’s actual density. Sketch paired horizontal contributions and retain their cancellation before integration.
Compare a finite line with its infinite limit
Worked teaching model · synthetic values · Uniform line spans −a to a at y=0; total charge fixed at 2 nC. Sample (0,b). Opposite horizontal components cancel by source symmetry. Infinite-line comparison holds the current lambda=Q/(2a), not Q fixed while length grows.
Reset keeps your prediction, captures and practice history.
Field versus perpendicular distance
Axes rescale independently. Curves join sampled coordinates; a joining segment is not additional measured evidence. Read physical units rather than screen angles or apparent slopes.
Field versus perpendicular distance: numerical coordinates
| distance (m) | Ey (N/C) |
|---|---|
| 0.25 | 69.7536 |
| 0.3125 | 54.902 |
| 0.375 | 44.8816 |
| 0.4375 | 37.6412 |
| 0.5 | 32.1548 |
| 0.5625 | 27.8518 |
| 0.625 | 24.3886 |
| 0.6875 | 21.5451 |
| 0.75 | 19.1734 |
| 0.8125 | 17.1701 |
| 0.875 | 15.4602 |
| 0.9375 | 13.9877 |
| 1 | 12.7103 |
| 1.0625 | 11.5948 |
| 1.125 | 10.6151 |
| 1.1875 | 9.75024 |
| 1.25 | 8.98317 |
| 1.3125 | 8.29995 |
| 1.375 | 7.68905 |
| 1.4375 | 7.14083 |
| 1.5 | 6.6472 |
| 1.5625 | 6.20131 |
| 1.625 | 5.79736 |
| 1.6875 | 5.43037 |
| 1.75 | 5.09609 |
| 1.8125 | 4.79082 |
| 1.875 | 4.5114 |
| 1.9375 | 4.25505 |
| 2 | 4.01936 |
| 2.0625 | 3.80221 |
| 2.125 | 3.60176 |
| 2.1875 | 3.41638 |
| 2.25 | 3.24461 |
| 2.3125 | 3.0852 |
| 2.375 | 2.937 |
| 2.4375 | 2.799 |
| 2.5 | 2.67031 |
| 2.5625 | 2.55013 |
| 2.625 | 2.43773 |
| 2.6875 | 2.33247 |
| 2.75 | 2.23377 |
| 2.8125 | 2.1411 |
| 2.875 | 2.05398 |
| 2.9375 | 1.97199 |
| 3 | 1.89474 |
| 3.0625 | 1.82188 |
| 3.125 | 1.75308 |
| 3.1875 | 1.68805 |
| 3.25 | 1.62653 |
| 3.3125 | 1.56827 |
| 3.375 | 1.51304 |
| 3.4375 | 1.46065 |
| 3.5 | 1.4109 |
| 3.5625 | 1.36362 |
| 3.625 | 1.31865 |
| 3.6875 | 1.27584 |
| 3.75 | 1.23507 |
| 3.8125 | 1.1962 |
| 3.875 | 1.15912 |
| 3.9375 | 1.12372 |
| 4 | 1.0899 |
| Quantity | Value | Unit |
|---|---|---|
| Line density | 1 | nC/m |
| Exact perpendicular field | 12.7103 | N/C |
| Midpoint field using 32 cells | 12.7119 | N/C |
| Infinite-line field at same density | 17.9751 | N/C |
| Point-charge far-field comparison | 17.9751 | N/C |
Symmetry cancels horizontal components, not the denominators of vertical components.
Integrate k lambda y/(x²+y²)^(3/2). The long-line limit holds lambda fixed; the far-field point comparison holds totalQ fixed. Interchanging those constraints changes the question.
Derive before checking. Retain contrasting captures and explain one assumption that could fail; calculated evidence is not actual laboratory work.
Symmetry cancels horizontal components, not the denominators of vertical components.
Integrate k lambda y/(x²+y²)^(3/2). The long-line limit holds lambda fixed; the far-field point comparison holds totalQ fixed. Interchanging those constraints changes the question.
Captures preserve recipes and replay their calculated results. They are synthetic model evidence, not physical measurements.
Understand
Apply
Public practice checks a specific claim. It does not establish independent mastery.
Which source, boundary or independence assumption would have to change before the conclusion changes?
Continue
Completion requires a saved prediction, at least one capture and a reflection. Presence checks do not grade your reasoning.
Skipping retains experiments and awards no mastery.
Save a science backup or import one
Science work is stored locally in this browser, separately from mathematics and AI. It does not sync automatically. Use this science-only backup; this checkout's older all-subject export does not include science.
A legacy file is available only when the complete snapshot fits the 36 MB limit. For larger snapshots, prepare a complete file set below; never discard notebooks to make a smaller file.
Matching imported notebook drafts replace their current drafts. Omitted lessons and known first attempts remain. Export your current work first if you want to retain both drafts.
Complete file sets and course backups
A file set can hold more work than one science file. Keep its manifest and every part together. Each file is limited to 36 MB. This format needs this version of LearnAI or a compatible newer version; older versions can use only the legacy single-file backup above.
The set includes every saved science course and global continuation at this moment. Later edits need a new export. A conflicting tab exports its own visible work, which may differ from saved work in another tab.
0 file(s) selected. File order and filenames do not determine identity. Missing, changed or conflicting parts block the entire restore; no good part is applied by itself.
Science storage: loading. No account or remote computation is required.