Learn

Learning preferences

Make learning more comfortable. Changes apply immediately.

Enlarges page content, including diagrams and their labels. You can also use your browser’s zoom.

Choose the colours that are easiest for you to distinguish. Applies to lesson diagrams and lab plots. Labels, shapes, hatching and line patterns also distinguish meanings. Source photographs and raw image brightness stay unchanged; mask-only views are available for image overlays.

ExampleComparisonSample link

Saved in this browser on this device. Preferences are separate from progress backups.

SCIENCE · INVESTIGATE AND EXPLAIN

Fit rotational inertia without hiding resistance or readout bias

The drive torque on a rotating body need not equal its net torque. In this fixed-axis model, an opposing torque q acts while the body rotates positively, so τdrive−q=Iα. For unchanged I and constant q, plotting drive torque against independently known angular acceleration gives slope I and intercept q.

Learning outcome: Vary resistance with zero fault, then vary the one-reading fault at fixed resistance. Retain slope, intercept and held-out residual. Propose a third condition that would distinguish changing resistance from a shared acceleration scale error.

Starting recap

Declare the axis, angular units, recipient and valid contact or material branch. Distinguish supplied shape factors from independently measured inertia.

All lessons are open directly. Your saved experiments remain when you leave and return.

Try

At q=0 and δ=0.4 N m, the fit gives inertia 2.2 kg m² and intercept−0.2 N m. The sign is a diagnostic warning about the assumed passive-resistance interpretation, not a physical negative-friction conclusion.

Open the experiment

Predict

For drive torque τ=Iα+q with constant q, the slope of τ versus α is:

Experiment

Vary resistance with zero fault, then vary the one-reading fault at fixed resistance. Retain slope, intercept and held-out residual. Propose a third condition that would distinguish changing resistance from a shared acceleration scale error.

Infer inertia and resistance from a drive-torque record

Worked teaching model · synthetic values · True fixed-axis inertia 2 kg m². At positive angular velocity, resistance is a constant opposing torque. Drive readings at independently exact angular accelerations 1 and 3 rad/s² include an extra fault only in the second; midpoint reading at 2 is held out. No real bearing law is established.

Reset keeps your prediction, captures and practice history.

Drive torque fit with one held-out state

indicated drive torque (N m)angular acceleration (rad/s²)037.20

Unlike graph quantities rescale independently; read units and values, not screen angles. 1: fitted drive relation (solid).2: fitting readings (filled markers).3: held-out reading (filled markers). Joined curves show the supplied model, not additional observations.

Equivalent numerical coordinates for Drive torque fit with one held-out state

fitted drive relation

angular acceleration (rad/s²)indicated drive torque (N m)
00.9
37.2

At most 82 representative computed coordinates including endpoints; the plotted curve can use a finer grid. A table of a revealed generator is not independent measurement evidence.

fitting readings

angular acceleration (rad/s²)indicated drive torque (N m)
13
37.2

At most 82 representative computed coordinates including endpoints; the plotted curve can use a finer grid. A table of a revealed generator is not independent measurement evidence.

held-out reading

angular acceleration (rad/s²)indicated drive torque (N m)
25

At most 82 representative computed coordinates including endpoints; the plotted curve can use a finer grid. A table of a revealed generator is not independent measurement evidence.

Calculated quantities under the declared measurement model
QuantityValueUnit
Drive reading at alpha 13N m
Drive reading at alpha 37.2N m
Inferred inertia2.1kg m²
Inferred opposing torque0.9N m
Held-out reading at alpha 25N m
Held-out residual-0.1N m

The slope estimates inertia while the intercept represents opposing torque only under the stated model.

Drive torque minus resistance equals I alpha. Differencing two readings cancels constant resistance, but a fault confined to one reading alters both slope and intercept. Negative inferred opposing torque in a faulty packet is a warning about assumptions, not proof that a passive bearing supplies energy. Fixed axis and unchanged distribution are necessary for this constant-I relation.

Predict before inspecting the values. Save contrasting records with assumptions and one alternative explanation. This virtual display does not certify practical measurement technique.

The slope estimates inertia while the intercept represents opposing torque only under the stated model.

Drive torque minus resistance equals I alpha. Differencing two readings cancels constant resistance, but a fault confined to one reading alters both slope and intercept. Negative inferred opposing torque in a faulty packet is a warning about assumptions, not proof that a passive bearing supplies energy. Fixed axis and unchanged distribution are necessary for this constant-I relation.

Captures preserve recipes and replay their calculated results. They are synthetic model evidence, not physical measurements.

Understand

Choose the axis, reference or material model

The drive torque on a rotating body need not equal its net torque. In this fixed-axis model, an opposing torque q acts while the body rotates positively, so τdrive−q=Iα. For unchanged I and constant q, plotting drive torque against independently known angular acceleration gives slope I and intercept q.

Build the algebraic relationship

The synthetic body has true I=2 kg m². Readings at α=1 and 3 rad/s² are2+q and 6+q+δ N m, where δ is a fault on only the second reading. The fitted inertia is 2+δ/2 and fitted opposing torque q−δ/2. Differencing cancels a truly common intercept, but it cannot cancel a fault affecting only one point.

Check the original numerical packet

A held-out reading at α=2 is 4+q N m without the added fault. The fitted line predicts4+q+δ/2, leaving residual−δ/2. At q=1,δ=0.2, fitted inertia is 2.1 and inferred resistance0.9, with midpoint residual−0.1 N m. This is an unused synthetic observation, not an independent real bearing measurement.

Test the boundary and independent evidence

A negative inferred opposing torque can arise from an inconsistent packet; it does not by itself prove that a passive bearing supplies energy. An external drive bias, changing friction, angular-acceleration scale or altered inertia could challenge the model. A known mass-distribution estimate or independent torque calibration can test alternatives. The relation assumes a rigid distribution and fixed axis throughout, not a body actively pulling masses inward.

Worked original case

At q=0 and δ=0.4 N m, the fit gives inertia 2.2 kg m² and intercept−0.2 N m. The sign is a diagnostic warning about the assumed passive-resistance interpretation, not a physical negative-friction conclusion.

Bounded investigation

Vary resistance with zero fault, then vary the one-reading fault at fixed resistance. Retain slope, intercept and held-out residual. Propose a third condition that would distinguish changing resistance from a shared acceleration scale error.

Changed-case numerical practice

Try the changed case before feedback

Drive readings 3 and 9 N m correspond to independently known angular accelerations1 and 4 rad/s². Under a constant opposing-torque model, find inertia in kg m².

This practice is public and unsaved. A matching number does not verify understanding. Retain your explanation, assumptions and changed-case evidence in the separate course workspace.

Sources and limits

Original content checked 30 October 2026 against OpenStax College Physics 2e. All records are supplied or generated teaching evidence. No rotating equipment, applied loads, material tests or physical assembly is requested. An admissible virtual model state does not certify real equipment safety, supervised practical skill or independent mastery.

Apply

For drive torque τ=Iα+q with constant q, the slope of τ versus α is:

Public practice checks a specific claim. It does not establish independent mastery.

Why does an exact two-point fit not validate the model that made those two points sufficient?

Continue

Completion requires a saved prediction, at least one capture and a reflection. Presence checks do not grade your reasoning.

Skipping retains experiments and awards no mastery.

Save a science backup or import one

Science work is stored locally in this browser, separately from mathematics and AI. It does not sync automatically. Use this science-only backup; this checkout's older all-subject export does not include science.

A legacy file is available only when the complete snapshot fits the 36 MB limit. For larger snapshots, prepare a complete file set below; never discard notebooks to make a smaller file.

Matching imported notebook drafts replace their current drafts. Omitted lessons and known first attempts remain. Export your current work first if you want to retain both drafts.

Complete file sets and course backups

A file set can hold more work than one science file. Keep its manifest and every part together. Each file is limited to 36 MB. This format needs this version of LearnAI or a compatible newer version; older versions can use only the legacy single-file backup above.

The set includes every saved science course and global continuation at this moment. Later edits need a new export. A conflicting tab exports its own visible work, which may differ from saved work in another tab.

0 file(s) selected. File order and filenames do not determine identity. Missing, changed or conflicting parts block the entire restore; no good part is applied by itself.

Science storage: loading. No account or remote computation is required.