Learn

Learning preferences

Make learning more comfortable. Changes apply immediately.

Enlarges page content, including diagrams and their labels. You can also use your browser’s zoom.

Choose the colours that are easiest for you to distinguish. Applies to lesson diagrams and lab plots. Labels, shapes, hatching and line patterns also distinguish meanings. Source photographs and raw image brightness stay unchanged; mask-only views are available for image overlays.

ExampleComparisonSample link

Saved in this browser on this device. Preferences are separate from progress backups.

SCIENCE · INVESTIGATE AND EXPLAIN

Test the no-slip condition before partitioning rolling energy

For a rigid body rolling without slipping on a stationary surface, center speed and angular speed obey v=Rω, with consistent signs. That relation is a constraint supported by contact forces, not a universal description of every moving, spinning object. While slipping, translation and rotation must be analyzed separately.

Learning outcome: Compare β=0.5 and 1 at 30° and 40°. Derive required friction before evaluating the energy split. For one feasible state compare energy and constant-acceleration geometry, and explain why a failed state needs independent slip dynamics.

Starting recap

Declare the axis, angular units, recipient and valid contact or material branch. Distinguish supplied shape factors from independently measured inertia.

All lessons are open directly. Your saved experiments remain when you leave and return.

Try

For β=0.5 andθ=30°, acceleration is 10/3 m/s² and friction 10/3 N. The slope distance for a 0.6 m vertical drop is 1.2 m, so v²=2as=8, agreeing with the energy result.

Open the experiment

Predict

If available friction cannot enforce no slip, one should:

Experiment

Compare β=0.5 and 1 at 30° and 40°. Derive required friction before evaluating the energy split. For one feasible state compare energy and constant-acceleration geometry, and explain why a failed state needs independent slip dynamics.

Check friction before trusting a rolling-energy prediction

Worked teaching model · synthetic values · Ideal rigid body mass 2 kg, radius .5 m, g=10; available static coefficient .3. Released from rest through a declared vertical drop .6 m on a stationary slope. Conditional no-slip predictions are not asserted as actual motion when required friction exceeds its limit.

Reset keeps your prediction, captures and practice history.

Required coefficient across slope angles

minimum static coefficientslope angle (degrees)0400.27970

Unlike graph quantities rescale independently; read units and values, not screen angles. 1: constraint requirement (solid). Joined curves show the supplied model, not additional observations.

Equivalent numerical coordinates for Required coefficient across slope angles

constraint requirement

slope angle (degrees)minimum static coefficient
00
10.00581835
20.0116403
30.0174693
40.0233089
50.0291629
60.0350347
70.0409282
80.0468469
90.0527948
100.0587757
110.0647934
120.0708522
130.0769561
140.0831093
150.0893164
160.0955818
170.10191
180.108307
190.114776
200.121323
210.127955
220.134675
230.141492
240.14841
250.155436
260.162578
270.169842
280.177236
290.18477
300.19245
310.200287
320.20829
330.216469
340.224836
350.233403
360.242181
370.251185
380.260429
390.269928
400.2797

At most 82 representative computed coordinates including endpoints; the plotted curve can use a finer grid. A table of a revealed generator is not independent measurement evidence.

Calculated quantities under the declared measurement model
QuantityValueUnit
Required static coefficient0.19245ratio
No-slip branch feasible1flag
Conditional downhill acceleration3.33333m/s²
Required uphill friction3.33333N
Normal force17.3205N
Speed squared after declared drop8m²/s²
Translational kinetic energy after drop8J
Rotational kinetic energy after drop4J
Total gravitational energy released12J

Force and torque balances support the no-slip constraint and its energy prediction.

Combining mg sinθ−f=ma and fR=I alpha with a=R alpha gives a=g sinθ/(1+beta) and mu_required=beta tanθ/(1+beta). For an admissible drop, mgh=(1+beta)mv²/2. Static friction does no work at the stationary instantaneous contact point in this ideal model. Slipping requires independent translation/rotation equations and may dissipate energy; do not keep v=R omega after rejecting the constraint.

Predict before inspecting the values. Save contrasting records with assumptions and one alternative explanation. This virtual display does not certify practical measurement technique.

Force and torque balances support the no-slip constraint and its energy prediction.

Combining mg sinθ−f=ma and fR=I alpha with a=R alpha gives a=g sinθ/(1+beta) and mu_required=beta tanθ/(1+beta). For an admissible drop, mgh=(1+beta)mv²/2. Static friction does no work at the stationary instantaneous contact point in this ideal model. Slipping requires independent translation/rotation equations and may dissipate energy; do not keep v=R omega after rejecting the constraint.

Captures preserve recipes and replay their calculated results. They are synthetic model evidence, not physical measurements.

Understand

Choose the axis, reference or material model

For a rigid body rolling without slipping on a stationary surface, center speed and angular speed obey v=Rω, with consistent signs. That relation is a constraint supported by contact forces, not a universal description of every moving, spinning object. While slipping, translation and rotation must be analyzed separately.

Build the algebraic relationship

Write I=βMR² using a supplied shape factor β. On a slope, downhill force balance is Mg sinθ−f=Ma and the uphill friction torque about the center gives fR=Iα. Combining with a=Rα yields a=g sinθ/(1+β), f=βMg sinθ/(1+β). Required static coefficient is βtanθ/(1+β), because normal force is Mg cosθ.

Check the original numerical packet

The workbench allows coefficient 0.30. With β=0.5,θ=30°, required coefficient is 1/(3√3)≈0.19245, so the no-slip solution is supported. At β=1,θ=40°, requirement≈0.41955 exceeds the available value; the model omits a final rolling-speed prediction rather than passing a conditional result off as actual motion.

Test the boundary and independent evidence

For a feasible release through vertical drop0.6 m under g=10, gravitational energy 12 J becomes translation plus rotation: Mv²(1+β)/2. Thus v²=12/(1+β). At β=0.5, translational K is 8 J and rotational K4 J. Ideal static friction does no work at the instantaneously stationary contact point, although it affects both motions. Kinetic slip or real rolling resistance would require another energy account.

Worked original case

For β=0.5 andθ=30°, acceleration is 10/3 m/s² and friction 10/3 N. The slope distance for a 0.6 m vertical drop is 1.2 m, so v²=2as=8, agreeing with the energy result.

Bounded investigation

Compare β=0.5 and 1 at 30° and 40°. Derive required friction before evaluating the energy split. For one feasible state compare energy and constant-acceleration geometry, and explain why a failed state needs independent slip dynamics.

Changed-case numerical practice

Try the changed case before feedback

A body with suppliedβ=1 rolls without slipping from rest through height 0.4 m under g=10. Find final speed squared in m²/s².

This practice is public and unsaved. A matching number does not verify understanding. Retain your explanation, assumptions and changed-case evidence in the separate course workspace.

Sources and limits

Original content checked 30 October 2026 against OpenStax College Physics 2e. All records are supplied or generated teaching evidence. No rotating equipment, applied loads, material tests or physical assembly is requested. An admissible virtual model state does not certify real equipment safety, supervised practical skill or independent mastery.

Apply

If available friction cannot enforce no slip, one should:

Public practice checks a specific claim. It does not establish independent mastery.

Why can static friction affect angular acceleration without dissipating energy in this ideal rolling case?

Continue

Completion requires a saved prediction, at least one capture and a reflection. Presence checks do not grade your reasoning.

Skipping retains experiments and awards no mastery.

Save a science backup or import one

Science work is stored locally in this browser, separately from mathematics and AI. It does not sync automatically. Use this science-only backup; this checkout's older all-subject export does not include science.

A legacy file is available only when the complete snapshot fits the 36 MB limit. For larger snapshots, prepare a complete file set below; never discard notebooks to make a smaller file.

Matching imported notebook drafts replace their current drafts. Omitted lessons and known first attempts remain. Export your current work first if you want to retain both drafts.

Complete file sets and course backups

A file set can hold more work than one science file. Keep its manifest and every part together. Each file is limited to 36 MB. This format needs this version of LearnAI or a compatible newer version; older versions can use only the legacy single-file backup above.

The set includes every saved science course and global continuation at this moment. Later edits need a new export. A conflicting tab exports its own visible work, which may differ from saved work in another tab.

0 file(s) selected. File order and filenames do not determine identity. Missing, changed or conflicting parts block the entire restore; no good part is applied by itself.

Science storage: loading. No account or remote computation is required.