Learn

Learning preferences

Make learning more comfortable. Changes apply immediately.

Enlarges page content, including diagrams and their labels. You can also use your browser’s zoom.

Choose the colours that are easiest for you to distinguish. Applies to lesson diagrams and lab plots. Labels, shapes, hatching and line patterns also distinguish meanings. Source photographs and raw image brightness stay unchanged; mask-only views are available for image overlays.

ExampleComparisonSample link

Saved in this browser on this device. Preferences are separate from progress backups.

SCIENCE · INVESTIGATE AND EXPLAIN

Keep calibration ambiguity in an energy fit

A height-to-speed experiment can compare released gravitational energy with final kinetic energy, but only if both height and speed are calibrated. In this synthetic packet, an object starts at rest and descends heights1,2,3 m under g=10. The true fraction entering final kinetic energy is η, so true v²=2ηgh.

Learning outcome: Compare an η=0.8,s=1.1 packet with η=1,s=1 where available, then choose a state with apparent fraction above unity. Retain the product relationship and propose an independent measurement capable of separating its factors.

Starting recap

Choose the system, interval and reference frame before using a conservation statement. Keep vector momentum, scalar energy and transferred power distinct.

All lessons are open directly. Your saved experiments remain when you leave and return.

Try

At η=0.8,s=1.1 and h=2 m, true speed is√32≈5.65685 m/s and indicated speed≈6.22254 m/s. The indicated squared-speed slope is 19.36 m/s², compared with 20 for an ideal lossless calibrated packet.

Open the experiment

Predict

A speed-readout scale factor 1.2 changes an inferred kinetic energy by a factor:

Experiment

Compare an η=0.8,s=1.1 packet with η=1,s=1 where available, then choose a state with apparent fraction above unity. Retain the product relationship and propose an independent measurement capable of separating its factors.

Distinguish energy loss from speed-scale error

Worked teaching model · synthetic values · Synthetic point starts at rest and descends heights 1,2,3 m with g=10. True final v²=2 eta g h; indicated speed is s times true speed. Loss fraction and speed scale are disclosed generator parameters, not independently inferred from the same packet.

Reset keeps your prediction, captures and practice history.

Speed-squared packet and its calibration ambiguity

indicated speed squared (m²/s²)descent height (m)03600

Unlike graph quantities rescale independently; read units and values, not screen angles. 1: indicated packet (open markers).2: ideal lossless comparison (dashed). Joined curves show the supplied model, not additional observations.

Equivalent numerical coordinates for Speed-squared packet and its calibration ambiguity

indicated packet

descent height (m)indicated speed squared (m²/s²)
119.36
238.72
358.08

At most 82 representative computed coordinates including endpoints; the plotted curve can use a finer grid. A table of a revealed generator is not independent measurement evidence.

ideal lossless comparison

descent height (m)indicated speed squared (m²/s²)
00
360

At most 82 representative computed coordinates including endpoints; the plotted curve can use a finer grid. A table of a revealed generator is not independent measurement evidence.

Calculated quantities under the declared measurement model
QuantityValueUnit
True kinetic fraction0.8ratio
Inferred fraction from indicated speeds0.968ratio
Apparent fraction exceeds unity0flag
True speed at height 2 m5.65685m/s
Indicated speed at height 2 m6.22254m/s
Indicated speed-squared slope19.36m/s²

A linear energy-pattern fit can identify a product of parameters rather than loss and calibration separately.

The indicated v²/(2gh) is eta times speedScale². The same three height points cannot uniquely separate these two factors. An apparent fraction greater than one signals a failed calibration/model premise, not proof of energy creation. Independently calibrating speed or measuring another energy channel can distinguish hypotheses; a changed potential-energy zero cannot change a height difference.

Predict before inspecting the values. Save contrasting records with assumptions and one alternative explanation. This virtual display does not certify practical measurement technique.

A linear energy-pattern fit can identify a product of parameters rather than loss and calibration separately.

The indicated v²/(2gh) is eta times speedScale². The same three height points cannot uniquely separate these two factors. An apparent fraction greater than one signals a failed calibration/model premise, not proof of energy creation. Independently calibrating speed or measuring another energy channel can distinguish hypotheses; a changed potential-energy zero cannot change a height difference.

Captures preserve recipes and replay their calculated results. They are synthetic model evidence, not physical measurements.

Understand

Define the energy or momentum system

A height-to-speed experiment can compare released gravitational energy with final kinetic energy, but only if both height and speed are calibrated. In this synthetic packet, an object starts at rest and descends heights1,2,3 m under g=10. The true fraction entering final kinetic energy is η, so true v²=2ηgh.

Build the algebraic account

The instrument displays s times the true speed. Squaring the indicated value multiplies kinetic-energy inference by s², not s. The apparent fraction vindicated²/(2gh) therefore equals ηs². Even three exact points on a straight line identify that product rather than uniquely separating loss fraction and speed-scale error.

Check an original packet

At η=0.8 and s=1.1, the apparent fraction is 0.968. A nearly lossless-looking record can conceal genuine loss offset by an over-reading speed scale. At η=1 and s=1.2, the apparent fraction is 1.44. That is a failed premise of the measurement/model account, not evidence that gravity created extra energy beyond conservation.

Test the domain and evidence

An independent timing/length reference for speed or a separately measured thermal channel could distinguish these explanations. Repeating the same biased speed measurement more precisely does not resolve the ambiguity. Changing the zero of gravitational potential cannot alter a height difference or cure a scale fault. All parameters here are disclosed generator settings, not claims inferred uniquely from real observations.

Worked original packet

At η=0.8,s=1.1 and h=2 m, true speed is√32≈5.65685 m/s and indicated speed≈6.22254 m/s. The indicated squared-speed slope is 19.36 m/s², compared with 20 for an ideal lossless calibrated packet.

Bounded investigation

Compare an η=0.8,s=1.1 packet with η=1,s=1 where available, then choose a state with apparent fraction above unity. Retain the product relationship and propose an independent measurement capable of separating its factors.

Changed-case numerical practice

Try the changed case before feedback

A true kinetic fraction0.75 is observed with speed scale1.1. What apparent kinetic fraction is inferred?

This practice is public and unsaved. A matching number does not verify understanding. Retain your explanation, assumptions and changed-case evidence in the separate course workspace.

Sources and limits

Original content checked 30 October 2026 against OpenStax College Physics 2e. All packets and diagrams are synthetic teaching evidence. No physical launches, collisions, spring releases, explosive processes or equipment-safety judgments are requested. Retained self-reports and public numerical feedback do not certify supervised laboratory practice or independent mastery.

Apply

A speed-readout scale factor 1.2 changes an inferred kinetic energy by a factor:

Public practice checks a specific claim. It does not establish independent mastery.

Why does a small residual from a straight-line fit not establish an accurate speed scale?

Continue

Completion requires a saved prediction, at least one capture and a reflection. Presence checks do not grade your reasoning.

Skipping retains experiments and awards no mastery.

Save a science backup or import one

Science work is stored locally in this browser, separately from mathematics and AI. It does not sync automatically. Use this science-only backup; this checkout's older all-subject export does not include science.

A legacy file is available only when the complete snapshot fits the 36 MB limit. For larger snapshots, prepare a complete file set below; never discard notebooks to make a smaller file.

Matching imported notebook drafts replace their current drafts. Omitted lessons and known first attempts remain. Export your current work first if you want to retain both drafts.

Complete file sets and course backups

A file set can hold more work than one science file. Keep its manifest and every part together. Each file is limited to 36 MB. This format needs this version of LearnAI or a compatible newer version; older versions can use only the legacy single-file backup above.

The set includes every saved science course and global continuation at this moment. Later edits need a new export. A conflicting tab exports its own visible work, which may differ from saved work in another tab.

0 file(s) selected. File order and filenames do not determine identity. Missing, changed or conflicting parts block the entire restore; no good part is applied by itself.

Science storage: loading. No account or remote computation is required.