Learn

Learning preferences

Make learning more comfortable. Changes apply immediately.

Enlarges page content, including diagrams and their labels. You can also use your browser’s zoom.

Choose the colours that are easiest for you to distinguish. Applies to lesson diagrams and lab plots. Labels, shapes, hatching and line patterns also distinguish meanings. Source photographs and raw image brightness stay unchanged; mask-only views are available for image overlays.

ExampleComparisonSample link

Saved in this browser on this device. Preferences are separate from progress backups.

SCIENCE · INVESTIGATE AND EXPLAIN

Move heat from cold to warm with work

Close the energy and entropy accounts of a proposed refrigerator.

Learning outcome: Distinguish work input from work output, calculate delivered heat and diagnose cooling proposals that require too little work.

Starting recap

The cyclic device returns to its initial state. Reservoir entropy changes use signed heat into each reservoir divided by its absolute temperature.

All lessons are open directly. Your saved experiments remain when you leave and return.

Try

A device removes 1000 J from a cold compartment while receiving 300 J of work. How much heat must reach the warm side?

Open the experiment

Predict

At 240 K on the cold side and 300 K on the warm side, predict the delivered heat for 300 J of work and whether 200 J would still pass the entropy screen.

Experiment

Compare 300 J and 200 J proposals at 240 K, checking energy closure and the entropy sum. Find the 250 J reversible boundary. Test zero work and explain why undefined COP is not unlimited cooling performance.

Account for cooling, work input and delivered heat

Worked teaching model · synthetic values · A proposed cyclic device removes 1000 J per cycle from a fixed-temperature cold reservoir and delivers heat only to a 300 K reservoir. Work input is a nonnegative magnitude from ideal mechanical storage. No mass exchange, auxiliary inputs, other heat contacts or state accumulation. Energy balance is imposed; an entropy check may reject the proposal. Coefficients of performance are undefined at zero work input. No refrigerant, compressor, electrical conversion efficiency, temperature evolution, operating rate or real-device rating is modeled.

Reset keeps your prediction, captures and practice history.

Passes entropy screen · The proposed transfers pass this necessary entropy check; this is not a performance rating.

Proposed transfers · first two inputs sum to the third output040080012001600From cold reservoirWork into deviceTo warm reservoirEnergy (J) · dashed marker: minimum work input
Proposed performance and reversible bounds
QuantityProposalBound for these reservoirs
Work input per cycle300 JAt least 250.000 J
Cooling COP = Qc / Win3.333At most 4.000
Heating COP = Qh / Win4.333At most 5.000
Entropy changes for the proposed cycle
PartHeat into part (J)Temperature (K)Entropy change (J/K)
Cold reservoir−1000240-4.166667
Warm reservoir13003004.333333
Cyclic deviceNet −300Not specified along cycle0 (returns to initial state)
Combined with ideal work storageNo external heatNo single temperature0.166667

Cold-side removal 1000 J + work input 300 J = warm-side delivery 1300 J. For this same device and boundary, heating COP equals cooling COP plus 1. COP greater than 1 measures heat moved per unit work; it is not an energy-conversion fraction.

Passes entropy screen. Proposed cooling 1000 J + work input 300 J = delivered heat 1300 J per cycle.

Minimum reversible work 250.000 J; combined entropy change 0.166667 J/K. Passing this screen does not demonstrate a finite-power device.

Captures preserve recipes and replay their calculated results. They are synthetic model evidence, not physical measurements.

Understand

Reverse the service, not just a sign

A refrigerator’s useful service is removing heat from a cold region. A heat pump’s heating service is delivering heat to a warmer region. Both require a full energy account. In this lab, a proposed cyclic device removes Qc = 1000 J from a cold reservoir and receives work Win. It delivers Qh to a reservoir fixed at 300 K.

Qc, Qh and Win are positive magnitudes. The retained working substance returns to its starting state, so its internal-energy change is zero. Energy conservation gives Qh = Qc + Win. This differs from a heat engine delivering net work: here work enters the device.

At the default Win = 300 J, the warm side must receive 1300 J. It receives both the 1000 J removed from the cold side and the 300 J work input. If you use the earlier convention that work by the device is positive, its work is −300 J and its net heat is 1000−1300 = −300 J; ΔU = Q−W is still zero.

Check entropy before accepting a proposal

The cold reservoir is initially set to Tc = 240 K and stays at that temperature by assumption. It loses 1000 J, so its entropy change is −1000/240 ≈ −4.166667 J/K. The 300 K warm reservoir gains 1300 J, giving +4.333333 J/K. The device returns to its original entropy, and ideal mechanical work storage has no entropy change. The total is +0.166667 J/K.

This passes a necessary thermodynamic check. It does not identify a refrigerant, compressor, electrical motor or practical operating speed. The selected cold temperature is a teaching scenario, not a suggested household thermostat setting.

Reduce work input to 200 J while holding 240 K. Energy still balances: 1000 + 200 = 1200 J delivered. But the warm reservoir gains only 1200/300 = 4 J/K, making the combined change −0.166667 J/K. The proposal is rejected. Displaying its calculated heat transfer does not mean the device can perform it.

Find the minimum work

The combined entropy condition is Qh/Th − Qc/Tc ≥ 0, where Th = 300 K. Substitute Qh = Qc + Win and rearrange:

Win ≥ Qc(Th − Tc)/Tc.

The temperatures are in kelvin; their ratio uses an absolute scale. For our default reservoirs, Win must be at least 1000 × (300−240)/240 = 250 J. Select 250 J and verify that the reservoir entropy changes cancel. This is an ideal reversible boundary. Ordinary irreversible operation needs more work for the same heat removal and reservoir temperatures.

Set work to zero. The proposed removal remains 1000 J, but the total entropy change becomes 1000/300−1000/240 ≈ −0.833333 J/K. The proposal is impossible under these assumptions. A performance ratio that divides by zero is undefined; it is not an infinitely effective refrigerator.

Connect the balance to a device concept

A vapor-compression refrigerator uses a circulating working fluid. In a simplified cycle, the fluid absorbs heat on the cold side, compression requires work, heat is released on the warm side, and a pressure-reduction stage prepares the fluid to absorb heat again. The OpenStax refrigerator reference provides background. Our lab accounts for net transfers; it does not model phase changes, refrigerant properties or component losses.

With a refrigerator door open inside a closed room and its heat exchanger in that same room, both heat flows act on the room. Their difference adds the work input as heat over complete cycles. An air conditioner must deliver heat outside the region it is intended to cool. Always draw the boundary before deciding whether a region is cooled.

Transfer to another cooling target

A proposed refrigerator removes 600 J per cycle from 250 K and delivers heat to 300 K. Find the minimum reversible work. Screen a 100 J work proposal and calculate its warm-side heat delivery.

Check the refrigeration transfer

Minimum work is 600(300−250)/250 = 120 J. At 100 J input, warm-side delivery would be 700 J. The total entropy change would be 700/300−600/250 ≈ −0.066667 J/K. The claim balances energy but fails the second-law screen.

Apply

A cyclic refrigerator removes 900 J from its cold reservoir and receives 300 J of work. Heat delivered to the warm reservoir is:

Public practice checks a specific claim. It does not establish independent mastery.

Explain why the warm side receives both the removed heat and the work input, and why energy balance alone cannot authorize cold-to-warm heat transfer.

Continue

Completion requires a saved prediction, at least one capture and a reflection. Presence checks do not grade your reasoning.

Skipping retains experiments and awards no mastery.

Save a science backup or import one

Science work is stored locally in this browser, separately from mathematics and AI. It does not sync automatically. Use this science-only backup; this checkout's older all-subject export does not include science.

A legacy file is available only when the complete snapshot fits the 36 MB limit. For larger snapshots, prepare a complete file set below; never discard notebooks to make a smaller file.

Matching imported notebook drafts replace their current drafts. Omitted lessons and known first attempts remain. Export your current work first if you want to retain both drafts.

Complete file sets and course backups

A file set can hold more work than one science file. Keep its manifest and every part together. Each file is limited to 36 MB. This format needs this version of LearnAI or a compatible newer version; older versions can use only the legacy single-file backup above.

The set includes every saved science course and global continuation at this moment. Later edits need a new export. A conflicting tab exports its own visible work, which may differ from saved work in another tab.

0 file(s) selected. File order and filenames do not determine identity. Missing, changed or conflicting parts block the entire restore; no good part is applied by itself.

Science storage: loading. No account or remote computation is required.