Learning preferences

Make learning more comfortable. Changes apply immediately.

Enlarges page content, including diagrams and their labels. You can also use your browser’s zoom.

Choose the colours that are easiest for you to distinguish. Applies to lesson diagrams and lab plots. Labels, shapes, hatching and line patterns also distinguish meanings. Source photographs and raw image brightness stay unchanged; mask-only views are available for image overlays.

ExampleComparisonSample link

Saved in this browser on this device. Preferences are separate from progress backups.

SCIENCE · INVESTIGATE AND EXPLAIN

Read lunar phases as changing viewing geometry

Use neighboring positions to distinguish waxing and waning while keeping angles separate from dates.

Learning outcome: Relate elongation to apparent illumination and explain why a single fraction does not identify the phase branch.

Starting recap

Waxing means increasing visible illumination; waning means decreasing visible illumination.

All lessons are open directly. Your saved experiments remain when you leave and return.

Try

Both 90° and 270° Moon angles at node direction 0° have 50% illumination, on different branches.

Open the experiment

Predict

Can a single 50%-illuminated image establish whether illumination is increasing or decreasing?

Experiment

Hold node direction at 0° and trace increasing Moon angles. Compare neighboring values around each half-lit position before naming the trend.

Investigate Moon phases and orbital nodes

Worked teaching model · synthetic values · Circular orbit of radius 384400 km, inclination 5.145°, Earth at the origin and distant Sun along +x. Parallel sunlight illuminates half the sphere. Apparent disk fraction is unshadowed geometric area, not brightness. Changing node direction rotates the orbital plane. No dates, orbital timing, finite-disk overlap, shadow cones, eclipse attenuation or eclipse visibility are calculated.

Reset keeps your prediction, captures and practice history.

View down onto the ecliptic plane · equal x and y scalesOrbit radius 384400 km · body symbols exaggerated · height is hiddenSun direction (+x)Incoming sunlightAscending nodeEarthMoonCircle: ascending node · square: descending node · dashed red: node lineProjected alignment alone is insufficient: check latitude and axis offset below.
Apparent disk from Earth · unshadowed geometryHalf illuminated: 50.00% lit areaElongation at Earth: 90.000°Phase angle at Moon: 90.000°Local trend: IncreasingSunward direction drawn right; not a sky compass or a waxing/waning orientation.
Three-dimensional geometry and apparent phase
QuantitySelected valueMeaning
Normalized position (x, y, z)(0.00000, 0.99597, 0.08968)Earth-to-Moon vector divided by orbit radius
Latitude above ecliptic5.145°Signed angle above Earth's orbital plane
Height above ecliptic34471.67 kmNegative means below
Offset from Sun–Earth axis384400.00 kmTransverse distance, including hidden height
Angle from nearer axis direction90.000°No exact centerline alignment
Physical sphere illuminated50%Parallel sunlight; eclipse shadows omitted
Apparent disk illuminated50.00%Projected area, not reflected brightness

Try angle 90° with node 0°, then angle 270°: both disks are half illuminated, but height and the direction of phase change differ. Next set node 90° and angle 90°: the nearly full Moon misses the Sun–Earth axis by about 34472 km. An orbital node is a crossing of the ecliptic; it need not point toward the Sun.

Ordinary phases come from viewing different parts of the sunlit hemisphere, not from Earth's shadow. Even at exact centerline alignment this display omits eclipse shading. Real eclipse type, contacts, dates and local visibility require finite body sizes, distances and time-dependent geometry. No control step represents a fixed number of days. A stationary trend means zero instantaneous change at the selected position, not an unchanged phase throughout the orbit.

With normalized Sunward coordinate x, elongation E = arccos(x), phase angle = 180° − E, and the unshadowed illuminated disk fraction = (1 − x)/2. The top view hides z; the axis offset uses both transverse coordinates, 384400 √(y² + z²) km.

Half illuminated: 50.00% of the apparent disk illuminated (unshadowed). Sun–Moon elongation 90.000°.

No exact centerline alignment. Moon latitude 5.145°; distance from the Sun–Earth axis 384400.00 km. Increasing illuminated fraction as Moon angle increases with node direction fixed. Exact alignment is a geometric condition, not an eclipse forecast.

Captures preserve recipes and replay their calculated results. They are synthetic model evidence, not physical measurements.

Understand

A phase is a view, not a shadow moving around the Moon

Draw Earth at the center of a page and parallel sunlight arriving from the right. Place four small Moon circles around Earth. Shade the half of each circle facing away from the Sun, keeping the illumination direction fixed. Now mark the side an Earth observer faces. The overlap between the visible hemisphere and illuminated hemisphere changes around the orbit.

This drawing explains why a full Moon lies approximately opposite the Sun in the sky and a new Moon lies approximately toward it. Earth’s shadow is involved in a lunar eclipse, not the ordinary sequence of phases. NASA’s phase explanation provides the physical interpretation; the lab supplies a simplified geometry for testing it.

Use position and change together

Set Ascending-node direction to 0° and start at Moon angle 0°. Move forward through 90°, 180° and 270°. The unshadowed fractions are 0%, 50%, 100% and 50%. Continue to 345° and compare it with 15°. Each is close to new phase, but one is approaching the new-phase position and the other is moving away from it in this increasing-angle sequence.

Waxing means the visible illuminated fraction is increasing; waning means it is decreasing. A half-lit disk does not uniquely identify first or last quarter without information about the branch. Similarly, a crescent fraction does not alone establish whether it is waxing or waning. Record a neighboring position on each side before assigning a trend.

The Moon angle control measures position from the ascending node, not days since new Moon. The node direction control rotates the inclined orbital plane. Its adjustment changes the arrangement relative to the Sun, so an angle that gave a particular phase before that adjustment need not give the same phase afterward. Do not label slider values as calendar dates or lunar ages.

Make the angular relationship quantitative

Elongation is the Earth-centered angle between the Sun and Moon directions. The unshadowed fraction is f = (1 − cos E)/2. At E = 60°, cos E = 0.5 and f = 0.25. At E = 120°, cos E = −0.5 and f = 0.75. Doubling elongation from 60° to 120° triples this fraction; fractions do not grow linearly with angle.

Use a paper table with elongations 0°, 60°, 90°, 120° and 180°. Include a sketch of the disk and a numerical fraction for each. Label the sketches schematic: the curved boundary, called the terminator, is the day–night boundary viewed in projection. A percent alone is not a recipe for drawing that curve as a straight dividing line.

Compare equal fractions with different evidence

Find two positions in the fixed-node sequence with the same apparent fraction. Explain what the shared measurement establishes and what it leaves unresolved. The disk area supports a statement about illumination geometry. It does not supply distance, local rising time, apparent orientation in a particular observer’s sky or whether clouds permit a view.

The model also does not represent an actual dated orbit. NASA lists a real lunar orbital eccentricity of about 0.055, while this lab keeps distance fixed at 384,400 km. That representative scale and the 5.145° inclination come from the NASA Moon fact sheet. The simplification lets you separate phase geometry from changing distance without treating the resulting positions as an ephemeris.

At an exactly aligned full-phase position, the disk remains unshadowed in this display. A bright modeled disk is therefore not evidence against a possible eclipse geometry. It is evidence that shadow attenuation is outside the calculation.

Transfer from a short observation sequence

Two hypothetical image sequences show illuminated fractions of 30%, 40%, 50% and 70%, 60%, 50%, respectively. Assume their measurements use the same apparent-area definition and are ordered forward in time. Identify the trend in each sequence and state one conclusion that the final images alone cannot establish.

Check the moon-phases transfer

The first sequence is waxing and the second is waning. Both final images are 50% illuminated, so the final fraction alone cannot distinguish those branches. These hypothetical fractions do not determine dates, local visibility or eclipse occurrence.

Apply

Two time-ordered sequences end at 50% illumination: 30%, 40%, 50% and 70%, 60%, 50%. They are:

Public practice checks a specific claim. It does not establish independent mastery.

Explain ordinary phases without Earth shadow and identify information needed beyond one apparent fraction.

Continue

Completion requires a saved prediction, at least one capture and a reflection. Presence checks do not grade your reasoning.

Skipping retains experiments and awards no mastery.

Save a science backup or import one

Science work is stored locally in this browser, separately from mathematics and AI. It does not sync automatically. Use this science-only backup; this checkout's older all-subject export does not include science.

A legacy file is available only when the complete snapshot fits the 36 MB limit. For larger snapshots, prepare a complete file set below; never discard notebooks to make a smaller file.

Matching imported notebook drafts replace their current drafts. Omitted lessons and known first attempts remain. Export your current work first if you want to retain both drafts.

Complete file sets and course backups

A file set can hold more work than one science file. Keep its manifest and every part together. Each file is limited to 36 MB. This format needs this version of LearnAI or a compatible newer version; older versions can use only the legacy single-file backup above.

The set includes every saved science course and global continuation at this moment. Later edits need a new export. A conflicting tab exports its own visible work, which may differ from saved work in another tab.

0 file(s) selected. File order and filenames do not determine identity. Missing, changed or conflicting parts block the entire restore; no good part is applied by itself.

Science storage: loading. No account or remote computation is required.