Learn

Learning preferences

Make learning more comfortable. Changes apply immediately.

Enlarges page content, including diagrams and their labels. You can also use your browser’s zoom.

Choose the colours that are easiest for you to distinguish. Applies to lesson diagrams and lab plots. Labels, shapes, hatching and line patterns also distinguish meanings. Source photographs and raw image brightness stay unchanged; mask-only views are available for image overlays.

ExampleComparisonSample link

Saved in this browser on this device. Preferences are separate from progress backups.

SCIENCE · INVESTIGATE AND EXPLAIN

Convert charge to a product only after electron and efficiency accounting

Passed charge counts electron equivalents, not automatically the desired product.

Learning outcome: Vary current and duration, close desired plus competing charge, convert through F and the electron coefficient, and verify remaining initial metal inventory.

Starting recap

Refresh state-function boundaries, absolute temperature, dimensionless logarithms, written reaction/electron equivalents, conserved charge and formal orbital/identity bookkeeping.

All lessons are open directly. Your saved experiments remain when you leave and return.

Try

At2 A for300 s, Q600 C. With85% desired-current efficiency and two electrons per hypothetical64 g/mol metal, amount≈.002643 mol and mass≈.16915 g.

Open the experiment

Predict

Would a theoretical electrode potential alone establish85% product current efficiency?

Experiment

Vary current and duration, close desired plus competing charge, convert through F and the electron coefficient, and verify remaining initial metal inventory.

Separate electron charge from product current efficiency

Worked teaching model · synthetic values · Hypothetical reduction M²++2e−→M with molar mass64.0 g/mol, initial available M²+ .0200 mol.85% of total current produces this metal,15% goes to explicitly unspecified competing reactions. Constant current/efficiency are supplied; all allowed recipes retain enough inventory. No physical electrolysis or operating voltage/protocol.

Reset keeps your prediction, captures and practice history.

hypothetical product mass (g)virtual duration (s)05000.28190810
  • Desired product mass versus time: solid

Axes rescale. A multiplicity distribution, inverse-temperature relation and charge-budget graph have different meanings. Read each axis and do not treat a computed curve as additional measured evidence.

All calculated plot coordinates
Desired product mass versus time
virtual duration (s)hypothetical product mass (g)
00
8.3333330.004698469
16.666670.009396938
250.01409541
33.333330.01879388
41.666670.02349234
500.02819081
58.333330.03288928
66.666670.03758775
750.04228622
83.333330.04698469
91.666670.05168316
1000.05638163
108.33330.0610801
116.66670.06577856
1250.07047703
133.33330.0751755
141.66670.07987397
1500.08457244
158.33330.08927091
166.66670.09396938
1750.09866785
183.33330.1033663
191.66670.1080648
2000.1127633
208.33330.1174617
216.66670.1221602
2250.1268587
233.33330.1315571
241.66670.1362556
2500.1409541
258.33330.1456525
266.66670.150351
2750.1550495
283.33330.1597479
291.66670.1644464
3000.1691449
308.33330.1738433
316.66670.1785418
3250.1832403
333.33330.1879388
341.66670.1926372
3500.1973357
358.33330.2020342
366.66670.2067326
3750.2114311
383.33330.2161296
391.66670.220828
4000.2255265
408.33330.230225
416.66670.2349234
4250.2396219
433.33330.2443204
441.66670.2490189
4500.2537173
458.33330.2584158
466.66670.2631143
4750.2678127
483.33330.2725112
491.66670.2772097
5000.2819081
Calculated under the declared model
QuantityValueUnit
Total passed charge600C
Total electron amount0.006218562mol electrons
Charge assigned to desired reduction510C
Charge assigned to other reactions90C
Deposited hypothetical metal amount0.002642889mol
Deposited hypothetical metal mass0.1691449g
Remaining available metal-ion amount0.01735711mol

Charge counts electron equivalents; product amount also depends on reaction stoichiometry and current efficiency.

Q=It and electron amount Q/F are distinct from product amount: two electrons are required per deposited metal and only85% of the current follows that path. The model explicitly leaves sufficient starting inventory for every recipe. Current efficiency is supplied, not inferred from a cell voltage or a theoretical electrode potential; no real deposition or gas-producing procedure is instructed.

These calculated packets are not performed chemical measurements or separation procedures. Keep feasible inventories, activity conventions, fitting observations and independent checks distinct.

Charge counts electron equivalents; product amount also depends on reaction stoichiometry and current efficiency.

Q=It and electron amount Q/F are distinct from product amount: two electrons are required per deposited metal and only85% of the current follows that path. The model explicitly leaves sufficient starting inventory for every recipe. Current efficiency is supplied, not inferred from a cell voltage or a theoretical electrode potential; no real deposition or gas-producing procedure is instructed.

Captures preserve recipes and replay their calculated results. They are synthetic model evidence, not physical measurements.

Understand

Count electron amount from charge

Constant current I over time t supplies Q=It coulombs. Divide by the Faraday constant F to obtain electron moles. For the fictional reaction M²++2e−→M, two electron moles are needed for one mole of metal, so an ideal fully selective product would be Q/(2F).

The supplied current efficiency is .85, meaning only85% of passed charge drives this reduction. The rest belongs to competing reactions left unspecified. At2 A for300 s, total Q600 C, desired charge510 C and competing charge90 C. Desired product is510/(2F)≈.00264289 mol, or about.169145 g for the fictional64.0 g/mol metal.

Check the finite supply and what was assumed

The starting available metal-ion amount is .0200 mol, sufficient for every allowed control recipe. If an extrapolation exceeded that inventory, the constant-efficiency product law could not continue unchanged. A neat linear charge graph does not supply missing reactant.

Current efficiency is not the same as energy efficiency and cannot be read from an equilibrium potential. A real product assay, competing-reaction evidence and charge calibration would be needed to test it. No actual electrolysis, wiring or operating-voltage procedure is provided.

Transfer and check

For a separate three-electron reduction, Q900 C and current efficiency .80 give product720/(3F)≈.00248740 mol. Explain why using the two-electron divisor from the first packet would overstate product by50%, even if the current and timer were perfectly measured.

Source and evidence boundary

Conceptual reference checked 30 October 2026: OpenStax Chemistry 2e. All prose, cases, graphs and questions are original. These supplied thermodynamic, electrical, nuclear or orbital models are not actual measurements, apparatus instructions, synthesis protocols or practical certification. Retain conventions, independent constraints, changed-case reasoning and limits. No heating, wiring, electrolysis, source handling or chemical manipulation is requested.

Apply

For a two-electron reduction with current efficiency eta, product moles equal:

Public practice checks a specific claim. It does not establish independent mastery.

Which independent product measurement would test the supplied current-efficiency assumption?

Continue

Completion requires a saved prediction, at least one capture and a reflection. Presence checks do not grade your reasoning.

Skipping retains experiments and awards no mastery.

Save a science backup or import one

Science work is stored locally in this browser, separately from mathematics and AI. It does not sync automatically. Use this science-only backup; this checkout's older all-subject export does not include science.

A legacy file is available only when the complete snapshot fits the 36 MB limit. For larger snapshots, prepare a complete file set below; never discard notebooks to make a smaller file.

Matching imported notebook drafts replace their current drafts. Omitted lessons and known first attempts remain. Export your current work first if you want to retain both drafts.

Complete file sets and course backups

A file set can hold more work than one science file. Keep its manifest and every part together. Each file is limited to 36 MB. This format needs this version of LearnAI or a compatible newer version; older versions can use only the legacy single-file backup above.

The set includes every saved science course and global continuation at this moment. Later edits need a new export. A conflicting tab exports its own visible work, which may differ from saved work in another tab.

0 file(s) selected. File order and filenames do not determine identity. Missing, changed or conflicting parts block the entire restore; no good part is applied by itself.

Science storage: loading. No account or remote computation is required.