Learn

Learning preferences

Make learning more comfortable. Changes apply immediately.

Enlarges page content, including diagrams and their labels. You can also use your browser’s zoom.

Choose the colours that are easiest for you to distinguish. Applies to lesson diagrams and lab plots. Labels, shapes, hatching and line patterns also distinguish meanings. Source photographs and raw image brightness stay unchanged; mask-only views are available for image overlays.

ExampleComparisonSample link

Saved in this browser on this device. Preferences are separate from progress backups.

SCIENCE · INVESTIGATE AND EXPLAIN

Test a constant-fraction reaction model

Use half-life and exponential decay to predict a fresh interval and distinguish an assigned law from measured evidence.

Learning outcome: Explain first-order decay using equal fractional changes and test what it predicts about concentration and rate.

Starting recap

One half of one half is one quarter. Equal fractional reductions do not remove equal amounts.

All lessons are open directly. Your saved experiments remain when you leave and return.

Try

If half the reactant remains after ten seconds, must all of it be gone after twenty seconds?

Open the experiment

Predict

Predict concentrations at 20, 30 and 40 s from the assigned ten-second half-life. State whether equal intervals remove equal amounts or equal fractions.

Experiment

Compare ten-second windows beginning at 0, 10, 20 and 30 s. Record the fraction remaining and average rate. Then predict a twenty-second window beginning at 20 s before selecting it.

Measure a reaction rate over a chosen interval

Worked teaching model · synthetic values · Assigned irreversible first-order A → B with 1:1 stoichiometry, constant volume and temperature, initial A = 1 mol/L and B = 0. Half-life is 10 s, so k = ln(2)/10 s⁻¹. Exact synthetic concentrations, no measurement noise, reverse reaction or competing pathway. The assigned rate law is not inferred from the equation alone.

Reset keeps your prediction, captures and practice history.

00.250.50.7510102030405060Concentration (mol/L)Elapsed reaction time (s)

Solid curve: reactant A. Dashed curve: product B. Shading and the two dots mark the selected interval; the dotted straight segment joins its endpoints. Its negative slope is the signed concentration change per second. The positive disappearance rate is the opposite sign. Curves join exact five-second samples; they are not a measured trace.

Exact model evaluated every 5 seconds; displayed values rounded to 6 decimals
Time (s)A (mol/L)B (mol/L)
01.0000000.000000
50.7071070.292893
100.5000000.500000
150.3535530.646447
200.2500000.750000
250.1767770.823223
300.1250000.875000
350.0883880.911612
400.0625000.937500
450.0441940.955806
500.0312500.968750
550.0220970.977903
600.0156250.984375

Interval consumption: 0.500000 mol/L. Total product at 10 s: 0.500000 mol/L. A + B = 1 mol/L throughout this stipulated 1:1, constant-volume model. A different stoichiometry would require a different concentration ledger.

00.020.040.060.08123Row number · values in mol/(L s)
Calculated values on the same fixed scale
RowQuantityValue (mol/(L s))
1Instantaneous disappearance rate at start0.0693
2Average disappearance rate over interval0.05
3Instantaneous disappearance rate at end0.0347

Average disappearance rate: 0.050000 mol/(L s) from 0 to 10 s.

[A] changes from 1.000000 to 0.500000 mol/L; signed concentration change is -0.500000 mol/L. Positive disappearance rate = (1.000000 − 0.500000) / 10 s. Total B at the endpoint is 0.500000 mol/L; it includes product made before this observation window.

Captures preserve recipes and replay their calculated results. They are synthetic model evidence, not physical measurements.

Understand

Repeated halving predicts a curve

The fictional reaction’s ten-second half-life means that each successive ten seconds leaves half of the A that was present at the beginning of that interval. Starting from 1 mol/L, the sequence is 1, 0.5, 0.25, 0.125 and 0.0625 mol/L at 0, 10, 20, 30 and 40 s. It does not reach zero at 20 s: the second interval removes half of the remaining amount, not another half of the original amount.

Try ten-second windows at several starting times. The ratio of ending to starting A stays at 0.5. The amount consumed and the average disappearance rate both decline. This constant fractional change is the key prediction being tested inside the model.

Connect the numerical pattern to an equation

[A]t = [A]0 × 2^(−t/10) expresses repeated halving for a half-life of 10 s. Here [A]0 is the initial concentration and t is elapsed seconds. The exponent is dimensionless because t is divided by a time. At 20 s, the exponent is −2 and the remaining fraction is 1/4. At 5 s, the fraction is 1/√2, approximately 0.707107; a half interval does not remove exactly a quarter of the original amount.

The more general first-order expression is [A]t = [A]0 exp(−kt). The exponential function exp uses the number e as its base. The rate constant k has units s⁻¹, and this model assigns k = ln(2)/10 = approximately 0.069315 s⁻¹. The natural logarithm ln is the inverse of exp. You can use the repeated-halving version for the guided investigation without deriving the exponential equation.

The instantaneous disappearance rate is k[A]. At time zero it is about 0.069315 mol/(L s). At 10 s it is about 0.034657 mol/(L s). The ten-second average between them is 0.05 mol/(L s), which lies between those endpoint rates. This relationship follows from a smoothly declining rate here; it is not a rule for every possible time course.

Distinguish assumed law from evidence

The reaction equation A → B supplies a stoichiometric relationship, not experimental proof of first-order kinetics. The model explicitly assigns the rate law. A real investigation would measure concentrations at multiple times, control relevant conditions, quantify uncertainty and compare competing predictions. A straight-looking trend over a narrow range is weak evidence for a universal law.

For example, a constant-amount-loss model that removes 0.05 mol/L each second agrees with this model at 0 and 10 s. It predicts zero A at 20 s, while the first-order model predicts 0.25 mol/L. A sufficiently precise measurement near 20 s can distinguish those predictions. Merely matching the first two observations cannot.

The ideal equation remains positive at every finite time. A plotted curve may look flat or a rounded reading may show zero while a small concentration remains. Actual detection limits, finite molecule counts, reverse reactions and side reactions can make the ideal continuous model inappropriate. This widget does not represent those effects, and its flattening is not evidence of dynamic equilibrium.

Rate and final amount are different outcomes

Changing a first-order rate constant changes how quickly conversion occurs. In the stipulated irreversible model, the limiting product concentration is still the initial A concentration when time grows without bound. That statement does not imply catalysts improve equilibrium yield in real reversible systems, nor that a slow experiment will actually reach its theoretical endpoint before other processes intervene. This widget keeps k fixed; it lets you change the observation window, not chemical conditions.

Transfer: a different sample starts at 0.8 mol/L with the same ten-second half-life. Predict A at 30 s and its average disappearance rate from 20 to 30 s. This initial concentration is a written extension, not a widget setting.

Check the half-life transfer

At 20 s, A = 0.2 mol/L. At 30 s, A = 0.1 mol/L. The average disappearance rate is (0.2 − 0.1)/10 = 0.01 mol/(L s). The fraction remaining is unchanged by initial concentration under the stipulated first-order law; the absolute amount and rate scale with it.

OpenStax integrated rate laws gives the general first-order equation and half-life relationships.

Apply

A first-order sample starts at 0.8 mol/L and has a 10 s half-life. After 30 s, the model predicts:

Public practice checks a specific claim. It does not establish independent mastery.

Explain why the equation alone does not prove a first-order rate law, why a finite display can look flat, and what measurements would test the prediction.

Continue

Completion requires a saved prediction, at least one capture and a reflection. Presence checks do not grade your reasoning.

Skipping retains experiments and awards no mastery.

Save a science backup or import one

Science work is stored locally in this browser, separately from mathematics and AI. It does not sync automatically. Use this science-only backup; this checkout's older all-subject export does not include science.

A legacy file is available only when the complete snapshot fits the 36 MB limit. For larger snapshots, prepare a complete file set below; never discard notebooks to make a smaller file.

Matching imported notebook drafts replace their current drafts. Omitted lessons and known first attempts remain. Export your current work first if you want to retain both drafts.

Complete file sets and course backups

A file set can hold more work than one science file. Keep its manifest and every part together. Each file is limited to 36 MB. This format needs this version of LearnAI or a compatible newer version; older versions can use only the legacy single-file backup above.

The set includes every saved science course and global continuation at this moment. Later edits need a new export. A conflicting tab exports its own visible work, which may differ from saved work in another tab.

0 file(s) selected. File order and filenames do not determine identity. Missing, changed or conflicting parts block the entire restore; no good part is applied by itself.

Science storage: loading. No account or remote computation is required.