Source-to-practice auditHigh-school Algebra objective evidence
Registered program teaching and public task evidence, including plus standards. Direct means an explicit explanation/task match, not full completion, learner mastery or validated instructional effectiveness. Parent umbrella standards SSE.1, SSE.3 and REI.4 are represented by every lettered child below.
These are content-evidence judgments, not mastery badges. Direct task evidence does not establish a complete course, independent assessment or preparation for a particular examination. Row counts may group related sub-objectives and must not be read as a coverage percentage.
31 of 31 objective rows shown.
HSA-SSE.A.1.a · Direct task evidence
Interpret contextual components
Rental translation and revenue/cost construction connect coefficients, factors and quantities; retain unfamiliar transfer rather than counting substitution alone.
What this judgment means
The inspected explanation and learner tasks address the named action. This is not a full-course or mastery judgment.
Inspect the evidence
Link to HSA-SSE.A.1.a
HSA-SSE.A.1.b · Direct task evidence
Treat a compound part as one quantity
Reconciled 25 October 2026 after the school algebra reasoning addition. Learners name compound entities and their units, hold other inputs fixed, and distinguish factor scaling from changes in an exponent. Direct describes authored evidence, not completed standards or verified mastery.
What this judgment means
The inspected explanation and learner tasks address the named action. This is not a full-course or mastery judgment.
Inspect the evidence
Link to HSA-SSE.A.1.b
HSA-SSE.A.2 · Direct task evidence
Use structure to rewrite
Common-factor, zero-product and quartic factor-verification work provide actual structural manipulation. More unfamiliar examples would broaden sampling, not create the first evidence.
What this judgment means
The inspected explanation and learner tasks address the named action. This is not a full-course or mastery judgment.
Inspect the evidence
Link to HSA-SSE.A.2
HSA-SSE.B.3.a · Direct task evidence
Expose quadratic zeros
Factoring practice and contextual factored area forms address zeros and their meaning.
What this judgment means
The inspected explanation and learner tasks address the named action. This is not a full-course or mastery judgment.
Inspect the evidence
Link to HSA-SSE.B.3.a
HSA-SSE.B.3.b · Direct task evidence
Expose quadratic extrema
The combined-functions rubric explicitly requires completing both squares; garden forms connect vertex, domain and maximum.
What this judgment means
The inspected explanation and learner tasks address the named action. This is not a full-course or mastery judgment.
Inspect the evidence
Link to HSA-SSE.B.3.b
HSA-SSE.B.3.c · Direct task evidence
Rewrite exponential rates
Monthly/annual and arbitrary-interval factor tasks require equivalent exponent representations, including fractional powers.
What this judgment means
The inspected explanation and learner tasks address the named action. This is not a full-course or mastery judgment.
Inspect the evidence
Link to HSA-SSE.B.3.c
HSA-SSE.B.4 · Direct task evidence
Derive and use finite geometric sums
A written derivation and a contextual savings comparison exist. An amortization example would enrich applications but is not necessary to invent the first sum evidence.
What this judgment means
The inspected explanation and learner tasks address the named action. This is not a full-course or mastery judgment.
Inspect the evidence
Link to HSA-SSE.B.4
HSA-APR.A.1 · Direct task evidence
Polynomial operations and closure
Reconciled 25 October 2026 after the school algebra reasoning addition. Fresh addition, subtraction and multiplication are paired with a finite-term/nonnegative-exponent closure argument and a division counterexample. Direct describes authored evidence, not completed standards or verified mastery.
What this judgment means
The inspected explanation and learner tasks address the named action. This is not a full-course or mastery judgment.
Inspect the evidence
Link to HSA-APR.A.1
HSA-APR.B.2 · Direct task evidence
Remainders and factors
Both numerical use and a general written remainder/factor argument are explicit.
What this judgment means
The inspected explanation and learner tasks address the named action. This is not a full-course or mastery judgment.
Inspect the evidence
Link to HSA-APR.B.2
HSA-APR.B.3 · Direct task evidence
Zeros to polynomial sketches
The new supplied cubic, construction rubric and end-behavior task close the earlier gap between listing roots and drawing a labeled graph.
What this judgment means
The inspected explanation and learner tasks address the named action. This is not a full-course or mastery judgment.
Inspect the evidence
Link to HSA-APR.B.3
HSA-APR.C.4 · Direct task evidence
Identities with numerical applications
Reconciled 25 October 2026 after the school algebra reasoning addition. Learners prove general polynomial identities and apply each to explicit numerical relationships; the triple example does not assume a classification theorem. Direct describes authored evidence, not completed standards or verified mastery.
What this judgment means
The inspected explanation and learner tasks address the named action. This is not a full-course or mastery judgment.
Inspect the evidence
Link to HSA-APR.C.4
HSA-APR.C.5 · Direct task evidence
Binomial expansion (+)
The discrete lesson explains factor-choice coefficients, proves the general expansion and computes weighted coefficients. Its concrete counting entry is usable without advanced college theory.
What this judgment means
The inspected explanation and learner tasks address the named action. This is not a full-course or mastery judgment.
Inspect the evidence
Link to HSA-APR.C.5
HSA-APR.D.6 · Direct task evidence
Quotient plus proper remainder
Long division is verified by multiplication and the rational-function task explicitly uses quotient plus remainder to justify a slant asymptote.
What this judgment means
The inspected explanation and learner tasks address the named action. This is not a full-course or mastery judgment.
Inspect the evidence
Link to HSA-APR.D.6
HSA-APR.D.7 · Direct task evidence
Rational-expression operations (+)
Reconciled 25 October 2026 after the school algebra reasoning addition. All four operations are exercised with original denominator restrictions, nonzero-divisor checks and a closure argument distinguishing polynomial identity from pointwise values. Direct describes authored evidence, not completed standards or verified mastery.
What this judgment means
The inspected explanation and learner tasks address the named action. This is not a full-course or mastery judgment.
Inspect the evidence
Link to HSA-APR.D.7
HSA-CED.A.1 · Direct task evidence
Build one-variable models
Reconciled 25 October 2026 after the school algebra reasoning addition. New work/rate and travel tasks require constructing rational equations from contexts. Combined with existing linear, quadratic and exponential modeling evidence, the named family gap now has direct practice. Direct describes authored evidence, not completed standards or verified mastery.
What this judgment means
The inspected explanation and learner tasks address the named action. This is not a full-course or mastery judgment.
Inspect the evidence
Link to HSA-CED.A.1
HSA-CED.A.2 · Direct task evidence
Build and graph relationships
Production modeling and the garden construction require formulas, labeled graph descriptions, units and domain. A coordinate description with the stated rubric is accepted drawing evidence, not automatic graph grading.
What this judgment means
The inspected explanation and learner tasks address the named action. This is not a full-course or mastery judgment.
Inspect the evidence
Link to HSA-CED.A.2
HSA-CED.A.3 · Direct task evidence
Model constraints and viability
Reconciled 25 October 2026 after the school algebra reasoning addition. Learners build materials/time constraints, draw their intersection, and check viable integer decisions, including strict boundaries and empty/unbounded sets. Direct describes authored evidence, not completed standards or verified mastery.
What this judgment means
The inspected explanation and learner tasks address the named action. This is not a full-course or mastery judgment.
Inspect the evidence
Solve and interpret inequalities — Algebra foundations: expressions, equations and roots
Find intersections and classify systems — Algebra II and precalculus: functions and structure
Read a linear objective on a polyhedron — Optimization: models, certificates and algorithms
Build a feasible region from constraints — Algebra reasoning, constraints and solution evidence
- A school makes kits x and posters y, both whole numbers. A kit uses 2 sheets and 3 minutes; a poster uses 1 sheet and 2 minutes. There are 16 sheets and 27 minutes, and at least 3 kits are required. Form the feasible system and decide whether (5,6) and (6,4) are allowed.Written reasoning: review required
- Draw the region x≥0, y≥0, x+y≤5, y>x−1. Label each boundary solid or dashed, give an interior point and decide whether (3,2) belongs.Written reasoning: review required
- Compare x+y≤2 together with x+y>2, and x≥0 together with y≥1. Identify empty or unbounded feasible sets and prove each statement.Written reasoning: review required
Link to HSA-CED.A.3
HSA-CED.A.4 · Direct task evidence
Rearrange a formula
Symbolic isolation and the zero-coefficient case are explicit; numeric formula substitution alone is not the basis for this judgment.
What this judgment means
The inspected explanation and learner tasks address the named action. This is not a full-course or mastery judgment.
Inspect the evidence
Link to HSA-CED.A.4
HSA-REI.A.1 · Direct task evidence
Justify equation operations
The authored equation/reason table and reversible-operation explanation accompany a written lost-root diagnosis requiring justification. This is direct but a narrow public sample of full step-by-step arguments.
What this judgment means
The inspected explanation and learner tasks address the named action. This is not a full-course or mastery judgment.
Inspect the evidence
Link to HSA-REI.A.1
HSA-REI.A.2 · Direct task evidence
Rational and radical candidates
Tasks solve both families and explicitly repair excluded or extraneous candidates in the original equation.
What this judgment means
The inspected explanation and learner tasks address the named action. This is not a full-course or mastery judgment.
Inspect the evidence
Link to HSA-REI.A.2
HSA-REI.B.3 · Direct task evidence
Linear equations and inequalities
Reconciled 25 October 2026 after the school algebra reasoning addition. A letter coefficient is classified by positive, negative and zero cases; the right-side sign determines the degenerate inequality. Existing symbolic linear-equation work remains linked. Direct describes authored evidence, not completed standards or verified mastery.
What this judgment means
The inspected explanation and learner tasks address the named action. This is not a full-course or mastery judgment.
Inspect the evidence
Link to HSA-REI.B.3
HSA-REI.B.4.a · Direct task evidence
Derive the quadratic formula
Reconciled 25 October 2026 after the school algebra reasoning addition. A written task now requires the general square-completion derivation, its nonzero-leading-coefficient assumption and the absolute-value/sign-branch explanation; another requires a fresh numerical completion. Direct describes authored evidence, not completed standards or verified mastery.
What this judgment means
The inspected explanation and learner tasks address the named action. This is not a full-course or mastery judgment.
Inspect the evidence
Link to HSA-REI.B.4.a
HSA-REI.B.4.b · Direct task evidence
Choose quadratic solving methods
Reconciled 25 October 2026 after the school algebra reasoning addition. Method choice explicitly covers inspection/square roots, factored equations, completing a square and real/complex branches, complementing earlier formula applications. Direct describes authored evidence, not completed standards or verified mastery.
What this judgment means
The inspected explanation and learner tasks address the named action. This is not a full-course or mastery judgment.
Inspect the evidence
Link to HSA-REI.B.4.b
HSA-REI.C.5 · Direct task evidence
Prove elimination preserves solutions
The first linear-algebra lesson gives a reversible operation proof and asks the same mathematical action for a general row addition. Its entry requires only equations, not abstract vector spaces.
What this judgment means
The inspected explanation and learner tasks address the named action. This is not a full-course or mastery judgment.
Inspect the evidence
Link to HSA-REI.C.5
HSA-REI.C.6 · Direct task evidence
Solve linear systems exactly and approximately
Reconciled 25 October 2026 after the school algebra reasoning addition. Supplied scaled linear graphs and learner constructions are paired with exact checks; the mixed assessment adds a fresh noninteger intersection, an approximate drawing and a table bracket. Direct describes authored evidence, not completed standards or verified mastery.
What this judgment means
The inspected explanation and learner tasks address the named action. This is not a full-course or mastery judgment.
Inspect the evidence
Link to HSA-REI.C.6
HSA-REI.C.7 · Direct task evidence
Solve linear–quadratic intersections
Reconciled 25 October 2026 after the school algebra reasoning addition. Supplied parabola/line readings and a fresh circle/line construction require both coordinate pairs, approximate graph location and exact algebraic verification. Direct describes authored evidence, not completed standards or verified mastery.
What this judgment means
The inspected explanation and learner tasks address the named action. This is not a full-course or mastery judgment.
Inspect the evidence
Link to HSA-REI.C.7
HSA-REI.C.8 · Direct task evidence
Encode systems as Ax=b (+)
Reconciled 25 October 2026 after the school algebra reasoning addition. The lesson defines Ax=b from scalar rows and practices variable order; the mixed task explicitly requires encoding a fresh scalar three-equation system before solving. Direct describes authored evidence, not completed standards or verified mastery.
What this judgment means
The inspected explanation and learner tasks address the named action. This is not a full-course or mastery judgment.
Inspect the evidence
Solve systems without changing their solutions — Linear Algebra I: systems, spaces and linear maps
Multiply matrices in the order the maps act — Linear Algebra I: systems, spaces and linear maps
Encode and verify a matrix solution — Algebra reasoning, constraints and solution evidence
- Write the row for 2x−y+3z=4 using unknown order (z,x,y). What is the second coefficient?Automatically checked response; reasoning still matters
- Enter A=[[1,0,1],[1,1,0],[0,1,1]] and b=(3,1,2) into the inverse tool. Record A inverse and the solution, and independently check one full row of A times A inverse and all three original equations.Written reasoning: review required
Algebra reasoning: mixed independent evidence — Algebra reasoning, constraints and solution evidence
Link to HSA-REI.C.8
HSA-REI.C.9 · Direct task evidence
Inverse-based system solving (+)
Reconciled 25 October 2026 after the school algebra reasoning addition. An actual bounded exact-fraction 3×3 inverse calculator is embedded. A fresh task requires entering inputs, recording the inverse/solution and independently checking products and original equations; singular cases are distinguished. Direct describes authored evidence, not completed standards or verified mastery.
What this judgment means
The inspected explanation and learner tasks address the named action. This is not a full-course or mastery judgment.
Inspect the evidence
Undo a square linear system when possible — Linear Algebra I: systems, spaces and linear maps
- For A=[[2,1],[0,3]], enter the (1,2) entry of A⁻¹.Automatically checked response; reasoning still matters
- Find and verify the inverse of [[1,1],[1,2]].Written reasoning: review required
- A=[[1,2],[0,1]]. Solve Ax=(9,3). Enter x₁.Automatically checked response; reasoning still matters
- Which matrix is singular?Automatically checked response; reasoning still matters
Which number laws survive for matrices? — Real numbers, complex coordinates, vectors and matrices
Encode and verify a matrix solution — Algebra reasoning, constraints and solution evidence
- Enter A=[[1,0,1],[1,1,0],[0,1,1]] and b=(3,1,2) into the inverse tool. Record A inverse and the solution, and independently check one full row of A times A inverse and all three original equations.Written reasoning: review required
- Compare x+y+z=2, 2x+2y+2z=4, x−y=0 with the system obtained by replacing the second right side with 5. Explain the inverse status and describe all solutions or prove none exist.Written reasoning: review required
- For A=[[1,1,0],[0,1,1],[1,0,1]], a learner proposes B=(1/2)[[1,1,−1],[−1,1,1],[1,−1,1]]. Test the first row of AB. Explain why a plausible-looking array or a solution for one right side does not prove that B is A inverse.Written reasoning: review required
Link to HSA-REI.C.9
HSA-REI.D.10 · Direct task evidence
Graphs as equation solution sets
Reconciled 25 October 2026 after the school algebra reasoning addition. Two-direction set arguments, a complete circle, a punctured line and a union including a vertical line explicitly distinguish equation graphs from functions. Direct describes authored evidence, not completed standards or verified mastery.
What this judgment means
The inspected explanation and learner tasks address the named action. This is not a full-course or mastery judgment.
Inspect the evidence
Link to HSA-REI.D.10
HSA-REI.D.11 · Direct task evidence
Approximate intersections across families
Reconciled 25 October 2026 after the school algebra reasoning addition. Residuals, branch drawings and justified intervals cover polynomial, rational, absolute-value, exponential and logarithmic pairs; supplied linear graphs and the mixed line-bracket task complete the family set. Continuity, tangencies and pole exclusions are explicit. Direct describes authored evidence, not completed standards or verified mastery.
What this judgment means
The inspected explanation and learner tasks address the named action. This is not a full-course or mastery judgment.
Inspect the evidence
Link to HSA-REI.D.11
HSA-REI.D.12 · Direct task evidence
Half-planes and their intersections
Reconciled 25 October 2026 after the school algebra reasoning addition. School-entry diagrams and a live bounded half-plane construction now accompany tasks requiring solid/dashed boundaries, common-region shading and original-constraint membership checks. Direct describes authored evidence, not completed standards or verified mastery.
What this judgment means
The inspected explanation and learner tasks address the named action. This is not a full-course or mastery judgment.
Inspect the evidence
Read a linear objective on a polyhedron — Optimization: models, certificates and algorithms
Build a feasible region from constraints — Algebra reasoning, constraints and solution evidence
- Draw the region x≥0, y≥0, x+y≤5, y>x−1. Label each boundary solid or dashed, give an interior point and decide whether (3,2) belongs.Written reasoning: review required
- Compare x+y≤2 together with x+y>2, and x≥0 together with y≥1. Identify empty or unbounded feasible sets and prove each statement.Written reasoning: review required
- A school makes kits x and posters y, both whole numbers. A kit uses 2 sheets and 3 minutes; a poster uses 1 sheet and 2 minutes. There are 16 sheets and 27 minutes, and at least 3 kits are required. Form the feasible system and decide whether (5,6) and (6,4) are allowed.Written reasoning: review required
- A graphing window shows a shaded region stopping at x=6. The only constraints are x≥1 and y≥x. Explain why calling x=6 a maximum is invalid, and give a feasible point beyond the window.Written reasoning: review required
Link to HSA-REI.D.12