Learn

Learning preferences

Make learning more comfortable. Changes apply immediately.

Enlarges page content, including diagrams and their labels. You can also use your browser’s zoom.

Choose the colours that are easiest for you to distinguish. Applies to lesson diagrams and lab plots. Labels, shapes, hatching and line patterns also distinguish meanings. Source photographs and raw image brightness stay unchanged; mask-only views are available for image overlays.

ExampleComparisonSample link

Saved in this browser on this device. Preferences are separate from progress backups.

SCIENCE · INVESTIGATE AND EXPLAIN

Challenge an unlimited-growth prediction

Compare density-limited and exponential models under changed resource assumptions.

Learning outcome: Interpret carrying capacity as a contextual model parameter and identify when a coarse update gives an implausible forecast.

Starting recap

Population abundance changes through births, deaths and movement. This model combines net demographic effects into a rate rule and excludes migration.

All lessons are open directly. Your saved experiments remain when you leave and return.

Try

At N=20 and K=80, the density-limited increment is 0.25×20×(1−20/80)=3.75; exponential growth adds 5.

Open the experiment

Predict

What happens below, at and above K? Is K a permanent property of a species?

Experiment

Compare N=20 with K=80 and K=40. Then set N=80,K=80 and N=100,K=20. Capture the equilibrium and extreme cases, and identify which results need model revision.

Compare density limitation with exponential growth

Worked teaching model · synthetic values · Ten steps compare N_next = N + 0.25N(1 − N/K) with N_next = 1.25N. Values are continuous expected abundance, not literal fractional organisms. K is fixed; no age structure, migration or random environmental change is modeled. Density-limited values are floored at zero if a coarse step overshoots.

Reset keeps your prediction, captures and practice history.

Compare abundance trajectories

02755508251100024681012Expected individualsUpdate step

Solid: density-limited model. Dashed: exponential model. Both use the same axes; the trace gives exact values when the larger curve compresses the smaller one.

Inspect both population forecasts
StepLimitedExponential
020.00020.000
123.75025.000
227.92531.250
332.46939.063
437.29248.828
542.26961.035
647.25376.294
752.08995.367
856.632119.209
960.767149.012
1064.420186.265
027555082511001234Row number · values in individuals
Calculated values on the same fixed scale
RowQuantityValue (individuals)
1Initial abundance20
2Fixed K parameter80
3Density-limited final abundance64.4197
4Exponential final abundance186.2645

After 10 steps: limited 64.42, exponential 186.26 expected individuals.

Below K the density term is positive; at K it is zero; above K it is negative. A chosen K is an assumption about these conditions, not a permanent species constant. The coarse discrete model can fail for extreme initial conditions.

Captures preserve recipes and replay their calculated results. They are synthetic model evidence, not physical measurements.

Understand

Start with two competing forecasts

The exponential rule adds 25% of the preceding abundance each step. From 20, it predicts 25 after one step. The density-limited rule adds 0.25N(1 − N/K). With N = 20 and K = 80, it adds 3.75, giving 23.75.

N denotes abundance and K a carrying-capacity parameter for the modeled conditions. Below K, the density term is positive; at K it is zero; above K it is negative. Resources, interactions and environmental conditions can alter carrying capacity, so it is not a permanent species constant. Background: OpenStax, environmental limits.

Inspect an extreme case

At N = 100 and K = 20, the coarse update predicts 100 + 25×(1 − 5) = 0 in one step. That does not establish that a real population would vanish instantly. A finite-step approximation and assumed rate can produce a poor forecast when the starting state is far outside the intended regime.

Fractional results represent continuous expected abundance, not pieces of organisms. The lab omits age structure, random births and deaths, migration and changing resources. The exponential comparison helps expose the consequence of removing density limitation, not identify a universally correct model.

Connect populations to communities

Competition can change access to resources; consumers and predators can alter survival; mutualists can affect reproduction. Those mechanisms should motivate a model or measurement, rather than be hidden inside an unexplained fitted K.

Compare fixed K = 80 and K = 40 as two scenarios. This does not simulate an event halfway through a run or recovery of a habitat. A disturbance study needs timing, before-and-after observations, comparison sites and evidence about mechanisms.

In your reflection, identify which forecast is supported by the available observations and what new data could reveal a failure. A smooth curve alone is not evidence that the model describes the population.

Apply

For N=40 and K=80, what is the next density-limited abundance under the displayed rule?

Public practice checks a specific claim. It does not establish independent mastery.

A habitat disturbance reduces resources. Explain why comparing two fixed K scenarios is not a complete simulation of the disturbance, interactions or recovery.

Continue

Completion requires a saved prediction, at least one capture and a reflection. Presence checks do not grade your reasoning.

Skipping retains experiments and awards no mastery.

Save a science backup or import one

Science work is stored locally in this browser, separately from mathematics and AI. It does not sync automatically. Use this science-only backup; this checkout's older all-subject export does not include science.

A legacy file is available only when the complete snapshot fits the 36 MB limit. For larger snapshots, prepare a complete file set below; never discard notebooks to make a smaller file.

Matching imported notebook drafts replace their current drafts. Omitted lessons and known first attempts remain. Export your current work first if you want to retain both drafts.

Complete file sets and course backups

A file set can hold more work than one science file. Keep its manifest and every part together. Each file is limited to 36 MB. This format needs this version of LearnAI or a compatible newer version; older versions can use only the legacy single-file backup above.

The set includes every saved science course and global continuation at this moment. Later edits need a new export. A conflicting tab exports its own visible work, which may differ from saved work in another tab.

0 file(s) selected. File order and filenames do not determine identity. Missing, changed or conflicting parts block the entire restore; no good part is applied by itself.

Science storage: loading. No account or remote computation is required.