CUMULATIVE PORTFOLIO An edited research feature with source dossier Produce a research feature for a named audience using the fictional repair-café packet or inspected real sources. Label packet practice and independent research distinctly. Include a source dossier, editorial decision trail, accessible presentation and correction plan. Downloading a private review copy completes the release activity; public posting, interviews and disclosure of personal information are not required.
Loading saved English work…
Portfolio workspace Choose your briefHigh-school scaffold College extension Write a 700–1,000-word feature using at least three packet documents or inspected sources. Include an accurate headline, synthesis, three source cards, a limitations box, an editorial log and a process reflection.
Build it in stages Finish the six investigation artifacts and first transfer responses. Declare your question, audience, scope and packet/independent route. Build a source plan and dossier. Verify quotations against their source and record dependencies rather than counting copies as corroboration. Draft the feature with attribution beside claims. Preserve a baseline and provide a text equivalent for any chart or image that carries essential information. Use simulated or actual editorial feedback, label its origin and record decisions. Complete the claim audit and revise unsupported wording. Assemble the private release: final feature, references, source notes, decision log, correction plan, reflection and unfamiliar transfer response. Download the readable portfolio for human review. Your lesson evidence These links open your original saved investigations. The portfolio download includes their passages, annotations, source cards, performance cues, drafts and first/latest transfer responses.
Draft and revise Portfolio draft 0 / 16,000 characters · length is a storage limit, not a quality score Preserve this draft before revision Revision commentary — explain one substantive change and one choice you retained 0 / 16,000 characters · length is a storage limit, not a quality score Companion artifact or manuscript continuation Use this space for the adaptation, second medium, exhibit captions or a continuation of a longer manuscript requested by your brief. Label the material clearly. It is saved and exported with the portfolio; this field has its own 16,000-character allowance. Keep an earlier companion version below before revising it.
Companion artifact / manuscript continuation 0 / 16,000 characters · length is a storage limit, not a quality score Preserve companion before revision Portfolio sources and references Keep new project sources here; your lesson source cards also remain in the downloadable portfolio. Record a source once where it belongs. Use the notes for a reference list, synthesis matrix and research-route declaration. A filled card does not verify a source or count as independent research.
Your source dossier Keep source wording, your paraphrase and your reasoning in separate fields. Locators are stored as plain text; the site does not fetch or verify them. Label fictional teaching sources as fictional.
Add source card (0/8) References, synthesis notes and research route 0 / 16,000 characters · length is a storage limit, not a quality score Review criteria Use these descriptions to seek feedback or conduct a labeled self-review. The site records your account; it cannot verify a reviewer’s identity or certify quality.
Research scope and source judgment Still developing: The question exceeds available evidence or copied claims are treated as independent confirmation.
Convincing evidence: The inquiry is bounded; source roles, dependencies and limitations shape the claims.
Attribution and synthesis Still developing: Quotations are distorted, paraphrases closely copy the source or evidence is merely listed.
Convincing evidence: Borrowed material is faithful and traceable; relationships among sources support a clear account.
Editorial process Still developing: Feedback is accepted mechanically or revision history is invented.
Convincing evidence: The log documents reasoned decisions, substantive changes and accurately labeled review.
Publication accountability Still developing: The headline overclaims, essential visual information lacks a text equivalent or errors would be silently removed.
Convincing evidence: The release preserves limits, supplies accessible evidence and includes a specific correction plan and honest process reflection.
Review record — self-review or reader feedback, evidence from your draft, and next steps 0 / 16,000 characters · length is a storage limit, not a quality score Unfamiliar transfer task A student magazine draft claims a workshop doubled participants’ confidence. Its packet contains 12 voluntary end-of-session comments, no initial measure and one organizer’s promotional statement repeated by two blogs. Prepare a corrected lead, a source-dependency account and a claim-audit row. Explain what new evidence would be needed for the original claim and write a correction notice for an already distributed private draft.
Your independent response 0 / 16,000 characters · length is a storage limit, not a quality score Save project transfer response Apply the same rubric to this new case. There is no automatic correctness verdict.
Assemble for review ○ Still needed — An artifact and saved transfer response for each of the 6 investigations ○ Still needed — At least 3 source cards with creator, locator, quotation, paraphrase, relevance and limitation across lessons and portfolio ○ Still needed — At least 2 lesson revisions with different baseline/current drafts and commentary ○ Still needed — A portfolio draft and preserved comparison draft ○ Still needed — A revision commentary and rubric-based review ○ Still needed — A saved response to the unfamiliar project passage These checks establish that evidence is present. They do not assess its accuracy, originality or quality. Skipping alone does not satisfy evidence requirements; saved artifacts and transfer responses are checked independently.
Mark portfolio submitted for review Download readable portfolio
Not submitted for review.
Return to the course · All saved English work
