Did opinions change—or respondents?
Can a headline move while every group holds the same views?
Entering midway? Revisit Investigate apparent disagreement for the preceding worked example, or start here and use the explanation below.
Start with a concrete question
Fictional 100-person community: 75% of group A and 25% of group B support a proposal. You control group sizes and response rates, not opinions.
Try the initial inputs, then write a prediction before changing one setting. All calculations run locally on your CPU.
What do you expect?
Predict what happens when the higher-support group responds less often.
Change one thing. Inspect what happens.
- Compare population and respondent support at the initial settings.
- Make the two response rates equal; explain the result.
- Reduce both response rates to zero and interpret the missing estimate.
- Write a headline plus a question to ask the survey organizer about recruitment.
Your settingsMechanism
Calculation belowEvidence
Compare outcomes
Compare the current results
Every bar starts at zero and uses the same numeric scale in this chart. The upper bound automatically adjusts to the largest current value (at least 1), so compare the numbers when changing inputs. Units and quantities come from each label; different kinds of quantity are not interchangeable. Displayed values are rounded to at most six significant digits.Follow the calculation
- Fictional population: 100 people; group A 80, group B 20.
- Within-group support is fixed at 75% in A and 25% in B. Response is assumed unrelated to support within each group.
- Expected responses: A 20; B 20. Expected supporters: 20.
- Respondent support: 20/40 × 100 = 50.0%.
- Fixture population support: 80×0.75 + 20×0.25 = 65%.
Unequal response rates can shift the headline even when nobody changes their view. This fixture reveals population truth; real surveys generally do not.
Captures keep your inputs, prediction and observation. Results are recalculated from those inputs. Resetting inputs keeps your captures and challenge history.
Explain the mechanism
Did opinions change—or respondents?
Fictional 100-person community: 75% of group A and 25% of group B support a proposal. You control group sizes and response rates, not opinions.
Follow the mechanism
Initially A contributes 20 expected respondents and B also contributes 20. Expected supporters are 15 + 5 = 20, so the respondent headline is 50%.
Yet population support is 80 × 75% + 20 × 25% = 65%. Different response rates changed representation.
The example assumes responders and nonresponders have the same opinions within each group. Real nonresponse can violate that assumption too.
Worked example
Fictional population: 100 people; group A 80, group B 20.
Within-group support is fixed at 75% in A and 25% in B. Response is assumed unrelated to support within each group.
Expected responses: A 20; B 20. Expected supporters: 20.
Respondent support: 20/40 × 100 = 50.0%.
Fixture population support: 80×0.75 + 20×0.25 = 65%.
Calculation
Respondent support = (0.75 × A respondents + 0.25 × B respondents) ÷ all respondents × 100.
Try a controlled comparison
Compare population and respondent support at the initial settings.
Make the two response rates equal; explain the result.
Reduce both response rates to zero and interpret the missing estimate.
Write a headline plus a question to ask the survey organizer about recruitment.
What this does not establish
Group support is known only because this is a synthetic fixture; no real political opinion is represented.
Expected counts omit sampling randomness. Group adjustment alone cannot guarantee an unbiased real poll.
Try a fresh case
In a different poll, 30 group-A respondents have 80% support and 20 group-B respondents have 30% support. What is combined respondent support, as a percentage?
This is a public practice check. Retries support learning; matching a number does not certify independent proficiency.
Take the investigation further
Choose any extension. These are project prompts for you to carry out; they are not automatically assessed.
School investigation
Compare a voluntary classroom poll with a clearly defined invitation list.
College investigation
Simulate sampling variability separately from systematic nonresponse bias.
Workplace investigation
Audit a fictional stakeholder survey before using it to justify a policy.
Keep the evidence, choose your next step
Completion records your own decision that you have worked through this investigation. Practice checks and independent project evidence are separate.