Learn

Learning preferences

Make learning more comfortable. Changes apply immediately.

Enlarges page content, including diagrams and their labels. You can also use your browser’s zoom.

Choose the colours that are easiest for you to distinguish. Applies to lesson diagrams and lab plots. Labels, shapes, hatching and line patterns also distinguish meanings. Source photographs and raw image brightness stay unchanged; mask-only views are available for image overlays.

ExampleComparisonSample link

Saved in this browser on this device. Preferences are separate from progress backups.

Lesson 2 of 26

Finite affine and projective incidence

Prove incidence properties in small algebraic models.

Loading your saved responses…

Try the optional starting-point checks and targeted refreshers. You can continue directly into this lesson.

Try

The four binary coordinate pairs (0,0), (1,0), (0,1), (1,1) form an affine plane over the field F₂. Arithmetic is modulo two: 1+1=0. Its lines are not the entire strokes of a Euclidean drawing; they are specified sets of binary points. Each line contains exactly two points.

This example is useful because every pair and intersection can be checked exhaustively. It teaches incidence without pretending to reproduce length, angle or global order. A valid finite incidence plane is not automatically a model of every geometric axiom discussed later.

Predict

Predict how many lines are needed if each of the six unordered pairs of four points determines a different line. The answer is six. Predict whether the two diagonals of a drawn square must intersect in this model. Their Euclidean crossing is not one of the four binary points, so the model may call them parallel.

The picture’s extra ink is not part of the point set. This is an early warning against proving incidence by looking at a screen.

Experiment

List all lines and check each pair occurs once.

Equation in F₂Points
x=0(0,0), (0,1)
x=1(1,0), (1,1)
y=0(0,0), (1,0)
y=1(0,1), (1,1)
x+y=0(0,0), (1,1)
x+y=1(0,1), (1,0)

Choose one point and one line not containing it. Of the three lines through the point, exactly one is disjoint from the given line. Verify this directly, then repeat for a different point. The small model satisfies affine parallel uniqueness, even though it cannot satisfy the coming order extension axioms.

Understand

For any field F, define projective points as one-dimensional subspaces of F³ and projective lines as two-dimensional subspaces. Incidence means containment. Distinct projective points have independent representatives p and q. Their span is two-dimensional and is the unique plane containing both: any other such plane contains the span and has the same dimension.

Two distinct two-dimensional subspaces U,V meet in dimension one. Indeed dim(U∩V)=dim U+dim V−dim(U+V)≥1. An intersection of dimension two would imply U=V. Thus every two distinct projective lines meet in exactly one projective point.

Over a field with q elements there are q³−1 nonzero triples. Each one-dimensional subspace contains q−1 nonzero representatives, so the number of projective points is q²+q+1. Each line similarly contains (q²−1)/(q−1)=q+1 points. For q=2 this is the seven-point projective plane.

Apply

Explain why counting vectors without dividing by scalar multiples gives the wrong projective count. The coordinates (1,1,0) and (2,2,0) over F₃ describe the same one-dimensional subspace. They are two representatives of one geometric point.

For optional depth, count projective lines by nonzero linear functionals up to nonzero scaling. A functional’s kernel is a two-dimensional subspace, and two nonzero functionals with the same kernel differ by scale. This produces the same q²+q+1 count and anticipates point–line duality.

Do not add an arbitrary “between” relation and assume a finite plane becomes an ordered plane. Repeated extension along a strictly ordered line will force infinitely many points.

Continue

Write a model verification that states the point set, line set and incidence relation before proving any axiom. Include the dimension argument, not just the numerical count. Continue to order and Pasch to identify the additional assumptions responsible for segments, sides and crossings.

Apply · explain · revise

Practice and reasoning

Drafts save locally as you type. Reveal worked solutions when useful; the site remembers that exposure. Automatic matches check the requested answer, while written arguments require review against the rubric.

How many points does the projective plane over the field with three elements have?

Integers, fractions and finite decimals are accepted. Expressions such as sqrt(2) are not parsed by this checker.

Why can a finite affine plane fail to model ordered Euclidean geometry?

Your response

List the six lines of the affine plane F₂² and prove that each pair of points has a unique joining line.

Structure your argument and preserve revisions

These optional planning fields save locally. Recording your response saves an immutable copy of the argument and these fields. Older records may contain only first/latest responses; missing intermediate revisions are not reconstructed.

Each field allows 2,000 characters. Keep a specific claim, state where it applies, cite the facts you use, and explain what still needs checking. Blank fields are allowed and are not evidence of mastery.

For a field F, prove two distinct one-dimensional subspaces of F³ lie in a unique two-dimensional subspace.

Structure your argument and preserve revisions

These optional planning fields save locally. Recording your response saves an immutable copy of the argument and these fields. Older records may contain only first/latest responses; missing intermediate revisions are not reconstructed.

Each field allows 2,000 characters. Keep a specific claim, state where it applies, cite the facts you use, and explain what still needs checking. Blank fields are allowed and are not evidence of mastery.

Prove that distinct two-dimensional subspaces of F³ intersect in a one-dimensional subspace.

Structure your argument and preserve revisions

These optional planning fields save locally. Recording your response saves an immutable copy of the argument and these fields. Older records may contain only first/latest responses; missing intermediate revisions are not reconstructed.

Each field allows 2,000 characters. Keep a specific claim, state where it applies, cite the facts you use, and explain what still needs checking. Blank fields are allowed and are not evidence of mastery.

Derive q²+q+1 points in a projective plane over a field of q elements and q+1 points on each line.

Structure your argument and preserve revisions

These optional planning fields save locally. Recording your response saves an immutable copy of the argument and these fields. Older records may contain only first/latest responses; missing intermediate revisions are not reconstructed.

Each field allows 2,000 characters. Keep a specific claim, state where it applies, cite the facts you use, and explain what still needs checking. Blank fields are allowed and are not evidence of mastery.

Reflect and continue

Before marking this lesson complete, explain one key idea without the worked solution and identify a condition that matters. Marking complete records participation, not independent mastery.