The map F(x,y)=(x+y,x−y) has invertible derivative everywhere and an explicit linear inverse. A nonlinear map with invertible derivative at one point resembles such a map sufficiently closely nearby. The inverse function theorem turns that resemblance into a local C¹ inverse. It does not say the map is globally injective or that a numerical Newton iteration works from every starting point.
Predict
Predict why the derivative must be invertible in equal dimensions. A singular linear approximation loses at least one direction, so it cannot be inverted as a linear map. The nonlinear function may still have a continuous inverse, as x³ does, but its inverse need not be differentiable. The theorem’s hypothesis is sufficient for a strong smooth inverse conclusion, not necessary for every weaker notion of invertibility.
Experiment
Normalize the local problem.
Step
Result
Translate a to zero
Base input is 0
Translate F(a) to zero
Base output is 0
Multiply output by DF(a)⁻¹
Derivative at zero becomes I
Seek F(x)=y
Fixed point of T_y(x)=y+x−F(x)
These invertible affine changes preserve the local question. In the normalized coordinates, the difference between F and the identity has a small derivative near zero, creating the contraction.
Understand
Choose a closed radius-r ball inside the domain on which ||I−DF||≤q<1; derivative continuity permits this. The segment estimate gives ||(x−F(x))−(z−F(z))||≤q||x−z||. Thus T_y is a contraction. If ||y||<(1−q)r, then ||T_y(x)||≤||y||+q||x||≤r, so it maps the complete closed ball into itself. Banach’s theorem supplies a unique solution x to F(x)=y, and the strict bound makes ||x||<r.
Also ||F(x)−F(z)||≥(1−q)||x−z|| on the ball, proving injectivity there and a Lipschitz bound for the inverse. Choose a small open output ball W and let V be its preimage inside the open input ball. Then V is open, contains zero, and F:V→W is bijective. This explicitly provides the neighborhoods in the theorem, rather than confusing the closed contraction ball with the final open domain.
Apply
To prove inverse differentiability at y=F(x), write an output increment k=F(x+h)−F(x)=Ah+r(h), with A=DF(x) invertible and r=o(||h||). The inverse Lipschitz estimate gives ||h||≤C||k||. Rearranging yields h=A⁻¹k−A⁻¹r(h), whose remainder is o(||k||). Thus the inverse derivative is A⁻¹. Its continuity follows from continuity of DF, continuity of the inverse map and continuity of matrix inversion on invertible matrices.
Repair a global conclusion using F(x,y)=(e^x cos y,e^x sin y). Its determinant is e^(2x)>0 everywhere, but adding 2π to y leaves the output unchanged. Each suitable neighborhood has an inverse branch; the whole plane does not admit one global inverse. Near the normalized base point, invertibility of each derivative follows from ||I−DF||<1: a zero image would imply ||v||≤q||v||, forcing v=0; a square injective matrix is invertible. Matrix inversion is continuous there through the adjugate-over-determinant formula.
Continue
Optional depth connects the fixed-point construction with Newton-like methods. The proof uses a fixed normalization matrix near the base point, not an unqualified guarantee for arbitrary Newton steps. Invariant neighborhoods and contraction constants remain essential.
State the theorem precisely: a C¹ map on an open subset of R^d with invertible derivative at a restricts to a C¹ bijection between neighborhoods of a and F(a), with the derivative formula above. Save the self-map estimate, injectivity estimate and inverse remainder argument as separate parts. Next, a block-coordinate construction will turn this local inversion result into an implicit function theorem for constraints.
Apply · explain · revise
Practice and reasoning
Drafts save locally as you type. Reveal worked solutions when useful; the site remembers that exposure. Automatic matches check the requested answer, while written arguments require review against the rubric.
For F(x,y)=(2x+y,x+3y), find the (1,1) entry of the derivative of its inverse.
Integers, fractions and finite decimals are accepted. Expressions such as sqrt(2) are not parsed by this checker.
An everywhere nonsingular derivative guarantees global injectivity:
State the finite-dimensional C¹ inverse function theorem precisely.
Structure your argument and preserve revisions
These optional planning fields save locally. Recording your response saves an immutable copy of the argument and these fields. Older records may contain only first/latest responses; missing intermediate revisions are not reconstructed.
Each field allows 2,000 characters. Keep a specific claim, state where it applies, cite the facts you use, and explain what still needs checking. Blank fields are allowed and are not evidence of mastery.
After translating a and F(a) to zero and normalizing DF(0)=I, explain how T_y(x)=y+x−F(x) yields local solutions.
Structure your argument and preserve revisions
These optional planning fields save locally. Recording your response saves an immutable copy of the argument and these fields. Older records may contain only first/latest responses; missing intermediate revisions are not reconstructed.
Each field allows 2,000 characters. Keep a specific claim, state where it applies, cite the facts you use, and explain what still needs checking. Blank fields are allowed and are not evidence of mastery.
Show F(x,y)=(e^x cos y,e^x sin y) has nonsingular derivative everywhere but is not globally one-to-one.
Structure your argument and preserve revisions
These optional planning fields save locally. Recording your response saves an immutable copy of the argument and these fields. Older records may contain only first/latest responses; missing intermediate revisions are not reconstructed.
Each field allows 2,000 characters. Keep a specific claim, state where it applies, cite the facts you use, and explain what still needs checking. Blank fields are allowed and are not evidence of mastery.
Show invertibility of the derivative is sufficient but not necessary for a continuous local inverse, using x↦x³.
Structure your argument and preserve revisions
These optional planning fields save locally. Recording your response saves an immutable copy of the argument and these fields. Older records may contain only first/latest responses; missing intermediate revisions are not reconstructed.
Each field allows 2,000 characters. Keep a specific claim, state where it applies, cite the facts you use, and explain what still needs checking. Blank fields are allowed and are not evidence of mastery.
Reflect and continue
Before marking this lesson complete, explain one key idea without the worked solution and identify a condition that matters. Marking complete records participation, not independent mastery.