Learn

Learning preferences

Make learning more comfortable. Changes apply immediately.

Enlarges page content, including diagrams and their labels. You can also use your browser’s zoom.

Choose the colours that are easiest for you to distinguish. Applies to lesson diagrams and lab plots. Labels, shapes, hatching and line patterns also distinguish meanings. Source photographs and raw image brightness stay unchanged; mask-only views are available for image overlays.

ExampleComparisonSample link

Saved in this browser on this device. Preferences are separate from progress backups.

Lesson 5 of 30

Choose an admissible conservation-law continuation

Solve Burgers Riemann problems and check entropy.

Loading your saved responses…

Try the optional starting-point checks and targeted refreshers. You can continue directly into this lesson.

Try

A Riemann problem starts with one constant state to the left of zero and another to the right. For Burgers flux u²/2, compare left/right pairs (3,1) and (1,3). In the first, faster characteristics catch slower ones. In the second, characteristics spread apart. Draw both pictures before assigning a formula at the interface.

The self-similar variable ξ = x/t is useful for positive time because the initial jump has no preferred length scale. It is not defined at t = 0; the initial condition must be checked as a limit.

Predict

For the expanding pair (1,3), predict a continuous profile joining the states with characteristic speed equal to x/t. For the compressive pair (3,1), predict whether the jump speed lies between the two characteristic speeds.

Experiment

The expanding solution is 1 when x/t is at most 1, x/t between 1 and 3, and 3 when x/t is at least 3. At time 2:

Position xRatio x/tSolution
001
422
843

Inside the fan, uₜ = −x/t² and u uₓ = x/t², so the PDE holds. The pieces join continuously; their derivative jumps do not introduce a jump in u or F(u). For the compressive data, the shock speed is 2, between the incoming speeds 3 and 1.

Understand

An entropy pair consists of a convex function η and a flux q satisfying q′(u) = η′(u)F′(u). Smooth solutions satisfy η(u)ₜ + q(u)ₓ = 0. Admissible weak solutions instead satisfy this expression at most zero in distributions. Equivalently, its pairing with every nonnegative compactly supported test function is nonpositive, with the initial term handled consistently.

For Burgers, take η(u) = u²/2 and q(u) = u³/3. Across a shock, entropy production is [q] − s[η]. For the jump 3 to 1 at speed 2, it is (1 − 27)/3 − 2(1 − 9)/2 = −2/3, which is negative. Reversing the states makes it positive, excluding the expansion shock. Recompute both signs carefully; reversing the jump reverses the bracket terms but not this shock speed.

The inequality is motivated by positive viscosity. If uₜ + F(u)ₓ = εuₓₓ, the entropy equation becomes ηₜ + qₓ = ε(η′uₓ)ₓ − εη″uₓ². Convexity makes the last term nonpositive. Passing to a vanishing-viscosity limit requires compactness and convergence arguments; the formal calculation alone is not an existence proof.

For general scalar uniqueness theory, a suitable family of convex entropies, such as the Kruzhkov family, and an appropriate initial trace are required. Checking just this one quadratic entropy is not a complete general uniqueness theorem.

Apply

Solve a fresh Burgers Riemann problem by first comparing left and right states. For a shock, verify Rankine–Hugoniot and compression. For a fan, verify the interior equation, continuous joining and the initial limit away from zero. State which parts are direct calculations and which global existence or uniqueness results you are relying on.

Continue

Fourier methods next treat linear equations by decomposing data into modes. Nonlinear fluxes usually mix those modes, so the clean independent-mode evolution developed there must not be transferred unchanged to Burgers dynamics.

Apply · explain · revise

Practice and reasoning

Drafts save locally as you type. Reveal worked solutions when useful; the site remembers that exposure. Automatic matches check the requested answer, while written arguments require review against the rubric.

For Burgers left state 0,right state 3, find the entropy solution at x=2,t=1.

Integers, fractions and finite decimals are accepted. Expressions such as sqrt(2) are not parsed by this checker.

For Burgers left state 5,right state 1, find the entropy shock speed.

Integers, fractions and finite decimals are accepted. Expressions such as sqrt(2) are not parsed by this checker.

Verify the Burgers rarefaction for u_L<u_R: u_L outside left, x/t in the fan, u_R outside right.

Structure your argument and preserve revisions

These optional planning fields save locally. Recording your response saves an immutable copy of the argument and these fields. Older records may contain only first/latest responses; missing intermediate revisions are not reconstructed.

Each field allows 2,000 characters. Keep a specific claim, state where it applies, cite the facts you use, and explain what still needs checking. Blank fields are allowed and are not evidence of mastery.

For convex entropy η(u), define its flux q and state the entropy inequality.

Structure your argument and preserve revisions

These optional planning fields save locally. Recording your response saves an immutable copy of the argument and these fields. Older records may contain only first/latest responses; missing intermediate revisions are not reconstructed.

Each field allows 2,000 characters. Keep a specific claim, state where it applies, cite the facts you use, and explain what still needs checking. Blank fields are allowed and are not evidence of mastery.

Explain formally why uₜ+F(u)ₓ=εuₓₓ dissipates convex entropy.

Structure your argument and preserve revisions

These optional planning fields save locally. Recording your response saves an immutable copy of the argument and these fields. Older records may contain only first/latest responses; missing intermediate revisions are not reconstructed.

Each field allows 2,000 characters. Keep a specific claim, state where it applies, cite the facts you use, and explain what still needs checking. Blank fields are allowed and are not evidence of mastery.

What is and is not established by checking one quadratic entropy for a general scalar conservation law?

Structure your argument and preserve revisions

These optional planning fields save locally. Recording your response saves an immutable copy of the argument and these fields. Older records may contain only first/latest responses; missing intermediate revisions are not reconstructed.

Each field allows 2,000 characters. Keep a specific claim, state where it applies, cite the facts you use, and explain what still needs checking. Blank fields are allowed and are not evidence of mastery.

Reflect and continue

Before marking this lesson complete, explain one key idea without the worked solution and identify a condition that matters. Marking complete records participation, not independent mastery.