Learning preferences

Make learning more comfortable. Changes apply immediately.

Enlarges page content, including diagrams and their labels. You can also use your browser’s zoom.

Choose the colours that are easiest for you to distinguish. Applies to lesson diagrams and lab plots. Labels, shapes, hatching and line patterns also distinguish meanings. Source photographs and raw image brightness stay unchanged; mask-only views are available for image overlays.

ExampleComparisonSample link

Saved in this browser on this device. Preferences are separate from progress backups.

Lesson 26 of 32

Identify exactly which functions are integrals of derivatives

Prove indefinite integrals are absolutely continuous.

Loading your saved responses…

Try the optional starting-point checks and targeted refreshers. You can continue directly into this lesson.

Try

The integral F(x)=integral from 0 to x of 2t dt equals x². Its derivative recovers 2x. This familiar calculation survives for arbitrary L1 integrands almost everywhere, but the converse requires more than continuity. A function can increase while its derivative is zero almost everywhere if its change is concentrated on a null set.

Predict

Predict whether a continuous increasing function with derivative zero almost everywhere must be constant. The Cantor distribution function is a counterexample. It is constant on every interval outside the Cantor set, yet its total increase is one. The property that rules out such singular accumulation is absolute continuity.

Experiment

Compare three functions on [0,1].

FunctionContinuousAbsolutely continuousRecovered from derivative integral
x²YesYesYes
Cantor distribution functionYesNoNo
Indicator of [1/2,1]NoNoNo

For x², partition the interval into disjoint short pieces and sum absolute increments. Compare this with the integral of 2x over their union. For the Cantor function, the omitted null support carries the entire increase.

Understand

A function F on [a, b] is absolutely continuous if for every ε>0 there is δ>0 such that any finite collection of disjoint intervals with total length below δ has sum of absolute F increments below ε. If F is an indefinite integral of f in L1, this follows because the sum of absolute increments is bounded by the integral of abs (f) over the union, and L1 integrals are uniformly small on sets of sufficiently small measure.

At a Lebesgue point x of f, the difference quotient of F is the average of f on the interval from x to x+h. Its difference from f(x) is bounded by twice the centered mean oscillation on radius abs (h), which tends to zero. Hence F prime=f almost everywhere.

For the converse, first note that absolute continuity implies bounded variation. Choose a coarse partition into intervals shorter than a suitable δ. Refine any proposed partition by these coarse endpoints. On each coarse interval, the sum of absolute refined increments is bounded by the absolute-continuity condition; summing finitely many coarse bounds gives a bound independent of the proposed partition. The variation function V(x) is increasing, and both V+F and V−F are increasing. Thus F is the difference of two increasing functions. The same small-interval bound makes V continuous, so these increasing functions are continuous.

An increasing continuous function induces a finite measure whose value on (u, v] is its increment. Finite additivity is telescoping; continuity of the function gives continuity of these interval increments under shrinking endpoint gaps, which yields the premeasure condition and permits the extension theorem. Applying this to the variation decomposition constructs a finite signed Stieltjes measure for F. Absolute continuity of F forces its variation measure to vanish on length-null sets: cover a null set by open intervals of total length below δ; on any finite selection and any finite subdivisions, the sum of absolute increments is below ε. Take suprema over subdivisions and then countable unions. Let ε decrease to zero.

Radon–Nikodym now represents the signed increment measure by an L1 density g. Therefore F(x)−F(a)=integral from a to x of g. The already-proved differentiation result identifies g with F prime almost everywhere. This proves the fundamental theorem for absolutely continuous functions.

Apply

The interval extension step uses continuity, while the density step uses absolute continuity. Explain the role of each rather than merging them into a single regularity claim. For a monotone function, a singular component of its Stieltjes measure is exactly the obstruction to reconstructing all increments from a length density.

Continue

An almost-everywhere derivative alone does not control global changes. Absolute continuity connects local derivatives to all interval increments. This distinction is essential in weak differential equations, distribution functions and any argument that integrates a derivative to recover an original function.

Continue to Express laws and independence through measures.

Apply · explain · revise

Practice and reasoning

Drafts save locally as you type. Reveal worked solutions when useful; the site remembers that exposure. Automatic matches check the requested answer, while written arguments require review against the rubric.

If F(x)=integral from 0 to x of 3t² dt on [0,1], compute F(1)−F(1/2).

Integers, fractions and finite decimals are accepted. Expressions such as sqrt(2) are not parsed by this checker.

For F(x)=2x on [0,3], what is its total variation?

Integers, fractions and finite decimals are accepted. Expressions such as sqrt(2) are not parsed by this checker.

Prove an indefinite integral of an L1 function is absolutely continuous.

Structure your argument and preserve revisions

These optional planning fields save locally. Recording your response saves an immutable copy of the argument and these fields. Older records may contain only first/latest responses; missing intermediate revisions are not reconstructed.

Each field allows 2,000 characters. Keep a specific claim, state where it applies, cite the facts you use, and explain what still needs checking. Blank fields are allowed and are not evidence of mastery.

Show F(x)=integral from a to x f has derivative f almost everywhere for f in L1.

Structure your argument and preserve revisions

These optional planning fields save locally. Recording your response saves an immutable copy of the argument and these fields. Older records may contain only first/latest responses; missing intermediate revisions are not reconstructed.

Each field allows 2,000 characters. Keep a specific claim, state where it applies, cite the facts you use, and explain what still needs checking. Blank fields are allowed and are not evidence of mastery.

Outline the measure-theoretic proof that an absolutely continuous F equals F(a)+integral from a to x of an L1 derivative.

Structure your argument and preserve revisions

These optional planning fields save locally. Recording your response saves an immutable copy of the argument and these fields. Older records may contain only first/latest responses; missing intermediate revisions are not reconstructed.

Each field allows 2,000 characters. Keep a specific claim, state where it applies, cite the facts you use, and explain what still needs checking. Blank fields are allowed and are not evidence of mastery.

Why does the Cantor function show that continuity and an almost-everywhere derivative are insufficient for the integral formula?

Structure your argument and preserve revisions

These optional planning fields save locally. Recording your response saves an immutable copy of the argument and these fields. Older records may contain only first/latest responses; missing intermediate revisions are not reconstructed.

Each field allows 2,000 characters. Keep a specific claim, state where it applies, cite the facts you use, and explain what still needs checking. Blank fields are allowed and are not evidence of mastery.

Reflect and continue

Before marking this lesson complete, explain one key idea without the worked solution and identify a condition that matters. Marking complete records participation, not independent mastery.