Check the three conditions for continuity and distinguish existence guarantees from locating or counting roots.
Loading your saved responses…
Try
Suppose a continuous temperature model starts at 18 degrees and ends at 24 degrees during one hour. Must it equal 21 at some time in between? Must it equal 21 exactly once? The first conclusion follows from continuity; the second needs additional information.
Predict
Predict which problems can be repaired by assigning one missing value: a hole where both branches approach height 4, or a jump with left height 4 and right height 7. Explain why assigning a value cannot change either one-sided limit.
Experiment
For x≠2 let f(x)=(x²−4)/(x−2), and choose f(2)=k. Nearby, f(x)=x+2, so its limit is 4. Compare the three tests below for k=0, k=4 and an unassigned value.
Continuity test at 2
k=0
k=4
Unassigned
Function value exists
yes
yes
no
Finite limit exists
yes
yes
yes
Value equals limit
no
yes
no
Sketch each graph using the same axes. Only the filled point changes. A continuous repair requires k=4, rather than any convenient number.
Understand
A function is continuous at a when f(a) exists, the limit at a exists, and that limit equals f(a). Continuity over a closed interval means continuity throughout its interior with the appropriate one-sided continuity at the endpoints. Polynomials are continuous everywhere; rational functions are continuous where their denominators are nonzero.
The intermediate value theorem, or IVT, states that a continuous function on a closed interval [a,b] takes every value between f(a) and f(b). If a target lies strictly between the endpoint values, it occurs at an interior input. This is an existence guarantee; it supplies neither a location formula nor a count of how often the target occurs.
For p(x)=x³+x−1 on [0,1], p(0)=−1 and p(1)=1. Polynomial continuity and the sign change guarantee a zero strictly between 0 and 1. Directly substituting 1/2 gives 1/8+1/2−1=−3/8, so the root is not simply the interval midpoint. A separate argument about increase could establish uniqueness, but IVT alone does not.
Now test q(x)=1/x on [−1,1]. Its endpoint values have opposite signs, yet q is undefined at zero and never equals zero. The missing continuity hypothesis invalidates the crossing argument. An apparent graph connection across a vertical asymptote is not a root.
For a piecewise formula, match the left limit to the right limit and actual value. If one branch is mx+1 to the left of 2 and the other is x²−1 at and to the right of 2, the equation 2m+1=3 yields m=1. You must check the branch that includes the endpoint, not merely compare arbitrary nearby samples.
Apply
Write IVT solutions in three sentences: identify the continuous function and interval; compute endpoint values and locate the target between them; state the existence conclusion with its limitations. Practice repairing continuity and identifying invalid theorem applications as well as obtaining numerical parameters.
Continue
The next lesson separates very large inputs from outputs that grow without bound near a finite input. Neither type of behavior makes infinity an ordinary function value.
Apply · explain · revise
Practice and reasoning
Drafts save locally as you type. Reveal worked solutions when useful; the site remembers that exposure. Automatic matches check the requested answer, while written arguments require review against the rubric.
For x≠2 let f(x)=(x²−4)/(x−2). Choose f(2)=k to make f continuous at 2.
Integers, fractions and finite decimals are accepted. Expressions such as sqrt(2) are not parsed by this checker.
Let f(x)=mx+1 for x<2 and f(x)=x²−1 for x≥2. Find m making f continuous at 2.
Integers, fractions and finite decimals are accepted. Expressions such as sqrt(2) are not parsed by this checker.
For f(x)=x³+x−1 on [0,1], what does IVT alone establish?
Why is applying IVT to f(x)=1/x on [−1,1] invalid, despite opposite endpoint signs?
Structure your argument and preserve revisions
These optional planning fields save locally. Recording your response saves an immutable copy of the argument and these fields. Older records may contain only first/latest responses; missing intermediate revisions are not reconstructed.
Each field allows 2,000 characters. Keep a specific claim, state where it applies, cite the facts you use, and explain what still needs checking. Blank fields are allowed and are not evidence of mastery.
Prove that x³+x=7 has a solution strictly between 1 and 2. Does your argument alone prove uniqueness?
Structure your argument and preserve revisions
These optional planning fields save locally. Recording your response saves an immutable copy of the argument and these fields. Older records may contain only first/latest responses; missing intermediate revisions are not reconstructed.
Each field allows 2,000 characters. Keep a specific claim, state where it applies, cite the facts you use, and explain what still needs checking. Blank fields are allowed and are not evidence of mastery.
Reflect and continue
Before marking this lesson complete, explain one key idea without the worked solution and identify a condition that matters. Marking complete records participation, not independent mastery.