Learn

Learning preferences

Make learning more comfortable. Changes apply immediately.

Enlarges page content, including diagrams and their labels. You can also use your browser’s zoom.

Choose the colours that are easiest for you to distinguish. Applies to lesson diagrams and lab plots. Labels, shapes, hatching and line patterns also distinguish meanings. Source photographs and raw image brightness stay unchanged; mask-only views are available for image overlays.

ExampleComparisonSample link

Saved in this browser on this device. Preferences are separate from progress backups.

Build and defend your work

Audit a service dashboard and propose a fair trial

A fictional service claims it became faster because its dashboard mean fell. Build an evidence brief using a cleaned record audit, a distribution summary and a comparison design. Preserve the raw data and distinguish a changed record from a changed service.

Choose an audience, investigate alternatives, copy evidence from your experiments, and produce an artifact. You can open this project at any time. Reports, numerical transfer checks and human review are separate outcomes.

Your project workspace

Investigate an invented school-club queue. Create a before/after table, explain missing waits and propose a fair scheduling trial.

1. Collect and compare evidence

Required experiment sources:

Include every source above and at least one pair with different inputs from the same experiment. Explain confounding changes yourself; the presence check does not judge your interpretation.

Open an experiment and change an input or capture a trial to make evidence available here.

2. Write and revise your report

State who the dashboard describes, its unit of observation, desired decision and a metric that actually measures the outcome.

Record every rule, retained/excluded counts, missing values and why your rule is justified. Include two captures that change only one repair.

Compare mean and median with units. Describe tail behavior, chart baseline and how missingness could change the conclusion.

Specify allocation, primary outcome, comparison groups and stopping rule. Explain sampling assumptions separately from bias.

Give a supported recommendation and one counterexample or sensitivity result that could reverse it.

This field stores up to 12,000 characters of inert text. Code runs only through the explicit bounded editor in the relevant lessons; project attachments never execute.

Review your work against the rubric

  • Raw observations remain distinguishable from repairs; missing values are not silently converted to observed zeros.
  • Summaries and plots use named denominators and units; selective omission is discussed.
  • Comparison design holds relevant conditions constant or explains remaining confounding.
  • Uncertainty assumptions and limits are explicit; a numerical interval is not treated as protection against bias.
  • Recommendation cites experiment captures and states what further evidence is required.
11 evidence requirements remain
  • Capture evidence from clean an event log.
  • Capture evidence from averages and missingness.
  • Capture evidence from design a fair experiment.
  • Capture evidence from quantify sampling uncertainty.
  • Include two different input configurations from the same experiment to compare.
  • Write your decision and measurement contract.
  • Write your raw-to-clean audit.
  • Write your distribution and honest chart.
  • Write your fair experiment and uncertainty.
  • Write your recommendation and unresolved evidence.
  • Add your project artifact: code, analysis, prototype or decision brief.

Editing the report or evidence returns it to draft. Recording verifies field presence and input comparisons, not correctness of your reasoning or code.

3. Check transfer to unfamiliar cases

These authored cases use different numbers or conditions from the lesson practice. They are public local checks, not secure certification. Each case permits three submissions. Opening, first responses and attempt counts survive imports; no reset creates fresh evidence.

Case data-missing-independent

Case data-composition-independent

Case data-precision-independent

Return to the course · My Work and backups