Separate the next decision from money already spent
Should an unrecoverable fee determine the next unit?
Your task: Write separate total-profit and incremental-decision tables for zero and five meals. Explain why the refundable location needs a different comparison.
Open the investigation · Read the explanation · Your saved evidence
Starting recap and vocabulary
Read counts with their units. A percentage divides a part by its named whole and multiplies by 100. A model assumption is not an observed fact.
- Sunk cost
- A past cost that the current choice cannot recover.
- Assumption
- A condition accepted for a model or argument; it needs justification before applying the result elsewhere.
Should an unrecoverable fee determine the next unit?
Write separate total-profit and incremental-decision tables for zero and five meals. Explain why the refundable location needs a different comparison.
Write separate total-profit and incremental-decision tables for zero and five meals. Explain why the refundable location needs a different comparison. Use the supplied records and show one intermediate step.
Make a provisional claim
Loading saved evidence…
Inspect evidence and test an explanation
The investigation controls appear when your local evidence is ready.
Connect evidence and mechanism
Worked example
Each meal adds 8 − 5 = 3 credits before the sunk fee. Selling five yields 15 contribution and total profit 15 − 30 = −15. Closing yields −30, so five meals improve the outcome despite a loss.
Check the reasoning, then transfer it
Loading response history…
Keep your evidence and choose a next step
Loading saved lesson status…