Learn

Learning preferences

Make learning more comfortable. Changes apply immediately.

Enlarges page content, including diagrams and their labels. You can also use your browser’s zoom.

Choose the colours that are easiest for you to distinguish. Applies to lesson diagrams and lab plots. Labels, shapes, hatching and line patterns also distinguish meanings. Source photographs and raw image brightness stay unchanged; mask-only views are available for image overlays.

ExampleComparisonSample link

Saved in this browser on this device. Preferences are separate from progress backups.

Microeconomics

Separate input substitution from a shift in labor supply

Can cheaper equipment change hiring without changing labor productivity?

Your task: Build a recipe-cost table and draw a separate labor-market supply shift. Explain why these changes belong to different comparisons.

Open the investigation · Read the explanation · Your saved evidence

Starting recap and vocabulary

Read counts with their units. A percentage divides a part by its named whole and multiplies by 100. A model assumption is not an observed fact.

Input substitution
Replacing one input with another within feasible production methods as relative costs change.
Assumption
A condition accepted for a model or argument; it needs justification before applying the result elsewhere.
01 · TRY

Can cheaper equipment change hiring without changing labor productivity?

Build a recipe-cost table and draw a separate labor-market supply shift. Explain why these changes belong to different comparisons.

Build a recipe-cost table and draw a separate labor-market supply shift. Explain why these changes belong to different comparisons. Use the supplied records and show one intermediate step.

Make a provisional claim

Loading saved evidence…

Inspect evidence and test an explanation

The investigation controls appear when your local evidence is ready.

04 · UNDERSTAND

Connect evidence and mechanism

Separate input substitution from a shift in labor supply

Question and evidence

Can cheaper equipment change hiring without changing labor productivity?

A fictional firm can produce one service batch with either 2 labor hours and 1 machine hour, or 1 labor hour and 2 machine hours. Labor costs 8 per hour and machines 4. Later machine cost rises to 10. Separately, a training program increases the number of qualified workers seeking jobs.

The numerical case is a teaching model, not a measured real-world effect.

Mechanism

Cost-minimizing input choice compares feasible combinations at current input prices. Substitution can change input demand, while product demand and marginal productivity can shift it. Labor supply reflects willingness and ability to work at different wages; migration, training and preferences can shift supply. A complete wage prediction also needs labor demand.

Worked calculation

Initially recipe 1 costs 2×8+4=20 and recipe 2 costs 8+2×4=16. At machine price 10, costs are 26 and 28, so the preferred recipe switches toward labor. The separate training scenario can shift labor supply right under stated conditions.

Challenge and revision

The two recipes are technically equivalent only for this batch and ignore transition costs. A shift in worker availability is not a movement along labor demand. Complementary inputs can behave differently from the substitutable recipes.

Build a recipe-cost table and draw a separate labor-market supply shift. Explain why these changes belong to different comparisons.

Revise your answer to “Can cheaper equipment change hiring without changing labor productivity?” using both source IDs. Separate the checked calculation from a judgment, and identify evidence that could reverse your judgment.

Vocabulary

Input substitution: Replacing one input with another within feasible production methods as relative costs change.

Assumption: A condition accepted for a model or argument; it needs justification before applying the result elsewhere.

Independent extension

Independently extend the investigation “Separate input substitution from a shift in labor supply” with a documented real dataset or scholarly source. Preserve definitions, recreate one calculation or evidence table, compare a rival explanation and report why the teaching example cannot establish the real-world conclusion.

Worked example

Initially recipe1 costs2×8+4=20 and recipe2 costs8+2×4=16. At machine price10, costs are26 and28, so the preferred recipe switches toward labor. The separate training scenario can shift labor supply right under stated conditions.

Check the reasoning, then transfer it

Loading response history…

Keep your evidence and choose a next step

Loading saved lesson status…